 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
Any type of investment in cryptocurrency is a high risk investment. Even project with already collected hard cup after years close their projects. I don’t think they are scammers or bumpers. If somebody has to say something, go on.
Quite true. About this even in this topic wrote repeatedly. While we see a team that is in no hurry to clarify the situation and a liar who accuses her and everyone  Their "no hurry" speaks for itself, and it's very loud. They've surely seen their trust status and aware of the flag raised on them as they've got a chance to post update on this thread after Nutildah made the announcement, and they choose to didn't raise any defense. It's strongly suggest that their silence is because they know they didn't have any defense, which leads to the only conclusion that the accusations is true, thus scam... Oh right,.I forgot that they've admit themselves that they're an exit-scam project, a ponzi if you like, as they said themselves they didn't have a working products, only creating hype to pump the price. An even more implicit fact here is how you "investors" continue discussing plain And worthless topic on this topic without really questioning dev and demanding answers despite the issue. Normal investor would already worried and at least would start firmly demanding clarification. You did the opposite, which would only be logical if you're: (a) part of the team and know what's really going on, but that'll made you coming here and discussing topic to fake interest as a wrong marketing. (b) someone that didn't really care about the issue, as you don't have anything to hold against the project, despite the "interest", thus your presence here is really subjected to be questioned for what purpose, which clearly to bump thread and fake interest, thus bumping service. Everything is much easier, who bought immediately after entering the stock exchange, a long time ago in the profit, many have no coins at all or remained at least just in case, so they are in principle satisfied with any development. The same NRG caused considerable doubt, I sold the last $ 2.5, and the other day the price was 10. nutildah is a liar who clearly follows his interests and although he did find plagiarism of white paper, you can not trust him, as you can see by reading the topics in which he is active. Your opinion is right, I agree with it. Masternodes mining is high risk investment instrument , but if you have some experience, you have to come first in a new project and get profit. Because of this warning on almost every page of the topic. Similar warnings have many shared services that mastered you can make good money, but you can lose it all. |
|
|
|
Any type of investment in cryptocurrency is a high risk investment. Even project with already collected hard cup after years close their projects. I don’t think they are scammers or bumpers. If somebody has to say something, go on.
Quite true. About this even in this topic wrote repeatedly. While we see a team that is in no hurry to clarify the situation and a liar who accuses her and everyone Their "no hurry" speaks for itself, and it's very loud. They've surely seen their trust status and aware of the flag raised on them as they've got a chance to post update on this thread after Nutildah made the announcement, and they choose to didn't raise any defense. It's strongly suggest that their silence is because they know they didn't have any defense, which leads to the only conclusion that the accusations is true, thus scam... Oh right,.I forgot that they've admit themselves that they're an exit-scam project, a ponzi if you like, as they said themselves they didn't have a working products, only creating hype to pump the price. An even more implicit fact here is how you "investors" continue discussing plain And worthless topic on this topic without really questioning dev and demanding answers despite the issue. Normal investor would already worried and at least would start firmly demanding clarification. You did the opposite, which would only be logical if you're: (a) part of the team and know what's really going on, but that'll made you coming here and discussing topic to fake interest as a wrong marketing. (b) someone that didn't really care about the issue, as you don't have anything to hold against the project, despite the "interest", thus your presence here is really subjected to be questioned for what purpose, which clearly to bump thread and fake interest, thus bumping service. Everything is much easier, who bought immediately after entering the stock exchange, a long time ago in the profit, many have no coins at all or remained at least just in case, so they are in principle satisfied with any development. The same NRG caused considerable doubt, I sold the last $ 2.5, and the other day the price was 10. nutildah is a liar who clearly follows his interests and although he did find plagiarism of white paper, you can not trust him, as you can see by reading the topics in which he is active. |
|
|
|
Apparently just have not done parsing prices from the exchange. |
|
|
|
Any type of investment in cryptocurrency is a high risk investment. Even project with already collected hard cup after years close their projects. I don’t think they are scammers or bumpers. If somebody has to say something, go on.
Quite true. About this even in this topic wrote repeatedly. While we see a team that is in no hurry to clarify the situation and a liar who accuses her and everyone |
|
|
|
That’s sad. But I think we need to wait comments about this from team.
As part of the bumping service hired to promote this scam, you are complicit in helping it. You know that this project has been outed as a likely scam yet you are still here promoting it. What does that say about you? Liar, unworthy to be in DT, accuses users of fraud, without proof |
|
|
|
What a shitstorm! *gets some popcorn and beer & takes the best seat
That's why I love such small projects topics. No post without a scandal inside))))))))))))))
nutildah boring and can not hear anyone but themselves, so the debate is conducted not very fun, it in case of any objections, once all records in scamers  |
|
|
|
Maybe somebody afraid other success? Pi know people who every day sitting and typing in forums about nothing...
Talking about yourself again? That's literally all you do -- type about nothing. You just talk to yourself all day long, churning out hundreds of spam comments for a few dollars. Pretty lame. There is no doubt in my mind this project is a scam -- investors be warned. If you believe that this project is scam you should open scam accusation. You have to understand that as long as people making profit from this project they will fight with you no matter if project is scam or not. If you are really much longer here than me you should have know that. I believe that while there are no sufficient arguments for any reasonable decisions. |
|
|
|
Maybe somebody afraid other success? Pi know people who every day sitting and typing in forums about nothing...
Talking about yourself again? That's literally all you do -- type about nothing. You just talk to yourself all day long, churning out hundreds of spam comments for a few dollars. Pretty lame. There is no doubt in my mind this project is a scam -- investors be warned. Just because You're sure doesn't mean it is. There are specific questions that developers would like to answer. While waiting, you should never jump to conclusions. |
|
|
|
Waiting for a response from the team. Some controversial moments I so understand they decided, but still something that remained  Contraversional moments? Is there something to be cautious about? As the above has been fairly emotional person, so far no changes have been made in the white paper. His accusations look... well, disturbing to say the least. But there is something strange about them. AFAIK bitcointalk is very quick about pinning scam warnings on suspicious messages. Sometimes there is no need in solid proofs. Right here there is no warnings pinned and OPs trust isn't red, so there's these accusations probably are not so solid as they look. Did developers answer something on these accusations? We hope that they will rewrite the white paper and announce the team. LOL, even they rewrite their white paper or make another one this coin is a scam! Remember Paycore coin that they also plagiarized their white paper? they released a new white paper after 1 week because of the accusation then abandoned the project after 2 weeks. Paycore: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5087964.0Paycore remember, still managed to get a plus, but quite a bit, but it was all clear after they began the second draft did nothing on the road map. |
|
|
|
Do you guys have a chance to go to the project coin explorer? It doesn't work for me...
In Diskord wrote that no one not works, must fix. |
|
|
|
Truly, there are slot of projects with fake team but they are still working.
Name one. And just because a scam makes you money doesn't mean its "working." Not that it ever will, you're only here to spam on behalf of scams. You get paid upfront by some desperate idiot to bump their boring projects for them. This project hired you because they know they would never make it on their own merits. They've probably spent more money on you than they've raised. There have been repeated accusations of falsifying the development team, but nevertheless the project has long been on the market. Personally, I don't think WAB is a good project and sold the coins I had a long time ago, but nevertheless similar precentors exist. |
|
|
|
How does that team increase popularity in nowadays?
Listings on masternode services occur regularly, in the same place and paid for banner advertising. Soon the promise of the second exchange. |
|
|
|
I think that if you made some money from that project - that is not a scam for you.
You are confusing the concept of fraud and failure of the project. Fraud can be very, very successful, but unsuccessful project is not always a fraud... |
|
|
|
Waiting for a response from the team. Some controversial moments I so understand they decided, but still something that remained Contraversional moments? Is there something to be cautious about? As the above has been fairly emotional person, so far no changes have been made in the white paper. His accusations look... well, disturbing to say the least. But there is something strange about them. AFAIK bitcointalk is very quick about pinning scam warnings on suspicious messages. Sometimes there is no need in solid proofs. Right here there is no warnings pinned and OPs trust isn't red, so there's these accusations probably are not so solid as they look. Did developers answer something on these accusations? It’s too easy to say “scam” and leave the thread after it. Investors and community need proofs to this words. Unfortunately lately called scam everything, even without sufficient arguments. |
|
|
|
Waiting for a response from the team. Some controversial moments I so understand they decided, but still something that remained Contraversional moments? Is there something to be cautious about? As the above has been fairly emotional person, so far no changes have been made in the white paper. His accusations look... well, disturbing to say the least. But there is something strange about them. AFAIK bitcointalk is very quick about pinning scam warnings on suspicious messages. Sometimes there is no need in solid proofs. Right here there is no warnings pinned and OPs trust isn't red, so there's these accusations probably are not so solid as they look. Did developers answer something on these accusations? We hope that they will rewrite the white paper and announce the team. |
|
|
|
Waiting for a response from the team. Some controversial moments I so understand they decided, but still something that remained Contraversional moments? Is there something to be cautious about? As the above has been fairly emotional person, so far no changes have been made in the white paper. |
|
|
|
New announcements every day. Apparently, the team has done its job well. Adding a coin to the new platform is very good
Promise a second exchange in the near future, crypto bridge unfortunately does not always work stably. |
|
|
|
Dear team, do you have a test version of the product or do you have a Youtube channel where you can show every detail how your product will work in the future?
If I'm not mistaken, promised to present the development team in July. We have two weeks to July and I hope these guys will do everything according their roadmap. Let's see. While apparently the developers are trusted, the price is relatively stable and very high. For such a new project the price is very high , you are right. But it’s better to buy more coins now, becouse nobody knows what price will be in future. You should never recommend to buy or dissuade from buying, everyone should make a decision on their own. Of course, it's up to you to decide for yourself whether to buy or sell a coin. I keep track of this coin's trade, the price has gone up again, demand is rising. The price is flat, but at a high level, so I think that the situation on the stock exchange is quite interesting. |
|
|
|
Dear team, do you have a test version of the product or do you have a Youtube channel where you can show every detail how your product will work in the future?
If I'm not mistaken, promised to present the development team in July. We have two weeks to July and I hope these guys will do everything according their roadmap. Let's see. While apparently the developers are trusted, the price is relatively stable and very high. For such a new project the price is very high , you are right. But it’s better to buy more coins now, becouse nobody knows what price will be in future. You should never recommend to buy or dissuade from buying, everyone should make a decision on their own. The person who is going to engage in investing should take into account the views of all users, and then analyze them and draw conclusions. I would bet on the contrary, to first analyze, and then seek the views of others. |
|
|
|
Dear team, do you have a test version of the product or do you have a Youtube channel where you can show every detail how your product will work in the future?
If I'm not mistaken, promised to present the development team in July. We have two weeks to July and I hope these guys will do everything according their roadmap. Let's see. While apparently the developers are trusted, the price is relatively stable and very high. For such a new project the price is very high , you are right. But it’s better to buy more coins now, becouse nobody knows what price will be in future. You should never recommend to buy or dissuade from buying, everyone should make a decision on their own. Of course, it's up to you to decide for yourself whether to buy or sell a coin. I keep track of this coin's trade, the price has gone up again, demand is rising. In the evening do the bidding came to life, and is now very active. |
|
|
|
|
