 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 »
|
SCAM
With so many arguments I almost agreed ! lol ! |
|
|
|
Where is the blockchain innovation in this project? It's just an advisory platform the potential for growth is extremely limited compared to real cryptoproject like EOS, LISK, IOTA or ETH. But I assume everyone understands that...
The ICO hard caps are rediculous. Get real man and get some decent graphic designer. This OP looks like it's made in MS paint.
Not having the same potential like EOS, ETH etc. doesn't mean they don't have a niche and a place in cryptoworld. Actually the market needs a project like that. Not everybody is expert in crypto, and the next months that will be more apparent when mass adoption is realized... I bet project like that will save many new (and old) investors from scams that are everywhere around us lately and admittedly very difficult for newbies to get identified. |
|
|
|
good concept but in your whitepaper, there is a section called seal of approval:
"The ICO HeadStart Seal of Approval shows that the criteria we think
are necessary to find the most promising ICOs, have been met.
Once a project gets approved by our community and is listed on
the platform, the members of the community have access to the
Scorecard Analysis."
how are we going to know you are not promoting an ICO just because they are paying to rise onto the top of list?
We have created a unique fundraising platform where backers and creators pay 0% fees without any additional costs. The backend of our Seal of Approval is made from an independent compliance company who provide services for our platform and 2 advisory Blockchain software companies. Also, till the time when our platform starts with its operation, we will include up to 3 more international companies that rate blockchain projects and their ICOs. Our platform has no benefits to host a pre-ICO and ICO of some project, which does not have a value in the future, as our whole concept depends of the success of projects funded through our platform and their tokens/coins on the market from which we can realize a profit with our trading department. In total, 80% of our profits will be used to buy back MOAT from token holders and 20% will be used to give a head start to newly listed projects which are deemed promising. Thank you that you answer all these questions here. That makes much clear all your concept. Agree with you that the very idea of you project is that you are interested in successful ICOs, moreover you will make a voice to common users. But how can we be sure in competence of your team that credit Seal of Approval? Will they always be the same people or will they change? When we started this project, we understood that one major aspect will contribute positively to the success of the platform. We had to connect the old with the new economy to be able to establish the safest ICO fundraising platform. In order to create the best of both, we brought financial experts and technical youth together. We have employed a Compliance Department with corporate banking experience that screened up to 10.000 business plans and projects per week. Our Compliance team will, according to our vision and mission, only expand, also on a local level country by country. An average backing in ICOs till today was $275 per person. About 90% of those people for this amount was not ready to spend an x amount of time to do a due-diligence on one projects before investments. We curate the most promising ICOs which are thoroughly screened, selected and certified with our Seal of Approval. We have basically provided a tool for traders and investors, obviating the need to do time-consuming due diligence because of our unparalleled ecosystem that allows us to provide our community with 100% profit sharing. And the seal of approval is only the first step of the "ICO's filtering", after that it is the community that will decide which ICO's will make it to the "final's" giving their vote depending of the MOAT each "curator"/member has aka. VOTING POWER reference from the whitepaper page 14: "Our community is the vital part of our platform. Once
the compliance department has finalized the screening
process of the ICOs in question, the approval falls in
the hands of our community members. The community
has decisive power to determine whether an ICO will be
selected. The platform creates the capital and the execution
structure and it democratizes that access to everyone."https://www.icoheadstart.com/public/docs/icoheadstart_whitepaper.pdf?18609 |
|
|
|
|
Hope that's a lesson for the majority, to use the centralized exchanges only for a couple of hours max. and then sent the coins back to their private wallets,
or even better just use **decentralized exchanges** like the very well known bitshares,openledger,nxt,counterparty,nxt,nvo(soon),bitsquare,akasha(soon),0x(soon),exscudo(soon),openANX(soon),waves, and so many more in the works!
They still have not enormous volumes but if we switch to them, "problem" is solved.
Begin to use them guys, it's the only way to win the battle against the governments and keep our hard earnings somewhere safe.
|
|
|
|
|
The Viva project already exceeded my expectation. I never thought development would be so fast.Really good job for everyone involved!
|
|
|
|
witness liondani and seed-node 212.117.213.163:2016 located in Switzerland updated to the latest 0.3.0 ! vote_for_witness youraccountname liondani true true |
|
|
|
There was a small oversight in witness vote calculations after the VESTS share split that took effect 2 hours ago. We have made a new release that fixes those issues and recalculates all witness votes tomorrow at 2:00 PM EST. We have tagged a release here that all miners / witnesses will have to update to. https://github.com/steemit/steem/releases/tag/v0.2.0There are several other witness scheduling / voting issues that were addressed in this fork. The good news is that most of the witnesses that were in top are still in the top and the network is still running smoothly through this transition. Behold the power of DPOS for rapid updates and bug fixes  . Updated to the latest release v0.2.0 Waiting for your votes guys!!!! vote_for_witness youraccountname liondani true true |
|
|
|
Witness: liondani and seed node (based in Switzerland & Germany) are updated to the latest STEEM release. I am running the following witness node: - Witness Name: liondani
- Witness Node IP: CONFIDENTIAL
- Seed Node IP & Port:212.117.213.186:2016 (Switzerland)
I can scale up all seed node and witness resources on demand in real time very quick. witness node located in Germany: CPU: six cores, 30 GB RAM, 2000 GB disk space, SSD boost, UNLIMITED traffic seed node located in Switzerland: CPU: four cores, 8 GB RAM, 2000 GB disk space, SSD, UNLIMITED traffic About me:Member of the bitshares community from the early days Delegate on bts1 Seed nodes running for bts1,bts2 Worker delegate and support for bts Developer James Calfee and so it begun... https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,6406.0.htmlPlease votefor my witness: vote_for_witness youraccountname liondani true truewill update with more details the next days. Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
When will the pre-sale-DigixGlobal assets be available ? I read somewhere that OPENLEDGER will be the first exchange trading them!
I am very interested since I don't made it to the crowd-sale that ended after about 14 hours!!!! I don't want to miss again a great opportunity.
|
|
|
|
3000+ BTC for 10 hours? Can't believe untill I see the escrow address.
Yep I want to see that too! Where are the evidences guys? |
|
|
|
Most of this will flow to VESTS which means that most of the "inflation" is more of a stock-split than true inflation. This means that 90% of all inflation does not reallocate wealth. Which leaves us with a mere 10% of inflation resulting in redistribution of ownership.
Is this guaranteed?  |
|
|
|
Why is the price being hit so hard People are running away from Sia like it's a toxic investment, I just don't get it. maybe miners that sell as soon as they get the coins (not really supporters) |
|
|
|
Sia only recently popped back on my radar after being mentioned on another site I visit frequently.
Which was?... (just curious ) |
|
|
|
We did not use the toolkit BitShares provide and our system (which we coded from 0) is ultimately very different. I think this week I will find the time to make a comparison chart. But it is still the basic idea behind it (isn't it?) Would it be possible to make such a big progress without the initial original DPOS invention? Why do you named it then DPOS anyway when it is so different? Using only the name(DPOS) should give you enough intensives to give credit to the initial creator and supporters... Not? Or at least you should not give a misleading(?) name that "help"(?) to bring you traffic from other community's that appreciate the DPOS technology. I suggest you strongly to think about it twice. It really doesn't seem to me a fair approach from your part and definitely it will hurt your project at some degree... (for example I would personally invest heavily on the project if I had not currently negative feelings regarding this issue...) |
|
|
|
|
Since you are using DPOS technology that is Daniel Larimer's invention (via Bitshares), have you share-dropped some XCR to Bitshares holders or at least to AGS investors that made DPOS tecnology possible?
|
|
|
|
|
