Spamming every page of this forum with the same childish post is pretty pathetic. No matter how great your case is, that type of activity weakens your argument. Just my personal opinion.
Thanks for your non-contribution.
You may have noticed that this is a blog, not a Wiki, and therefore, any low content post such as yours and the message before my recent one would force visitors to scroll back many pages to get to real information if core conclusions were not kept somewhere prominent such as on the last page of the blog. Therefore, as a major contributor of research and plain facts, I have decided to build a page that suits the purpose.
Too bad for those who take offense - my measure is just a reaction to the technical realities and the behavior of the real spammers like you who extend this thread even while there is almost nothing to be said that hasn't already been said about the fraud
Martin Armstrong.
Meanwhile, our themes of the day are still
"The Martin Armstrong Scam - Where and how to complain",
"Gumbi IS Martin Armstrong",
"Which Government has asked Martin Armstrong for Advice?",
"Socrates Technical Analysis Prediction Magic" and
"Economic Advice by Martin Armstrong".
Good comeback, genius. This isn't a 'blog', it's a public message board. Calling me a spammer (with my two posts in a year) shows that you need a new logic co-proceesor. Maybe a new motherboard and some more RAM as well. The content you regurgitate isn't cutting edge research. It is presented like an adolescent's grade school project.
It's like you lost money following someone else's opinion, and are nursing a personal grudge.
Have I threatened you by invading your safe space? Sorry if my low information post is stealing the spotlight from your masterpiece in investigate research.
Show Posts
