Bitcoin Forum
September 22, 2025, 06:34:58 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 29.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CACH] CACHeCoin released based on scrypt-jane on: March 07, 2014, 08:02:27 AM
So, I literally just started mining CACHeCoins about an hour ago. My R9 270s, on normal Scrypt, get a nice stable 480 or so, but I'm no where near that when I'm mining Cache.

I've been playing with settings in CGMiner, and I can't break 160 Kh/s per card. And weirdly, it doesn't seem to matter what I do, it's always 160. Intensity can be anywhere from 13 to 19, TC can be 8192 up to 12736, GPU Engine from 950 to 1070, I can even set the Mem clock between 800 and 1500 with no apparent hash rate changes.

Am I missing something? Shouldn't I be getting higher hash rates? I'm running SMOS with rmDavidson's version of CGminer. I didn't update the Catalyst drivers when I compiled, could that be it?

I'm starting off the command line like this: /opt/miners/cgminer/cgminer --scrypt-jane -I 15 --temp-target 70 --temp-overheat 80 --temp-cutoff 85 -g 2 -w 256 --thread-concurrency 8192 --gpu-engine 1000 --gpu-memclock 800 --gpu-powertune 0 --gpu-threads 2 --expiry 1 --queue 0 --lookup-gap 2 --gpu-fan 75 --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388949883 -o stratum+tcp://east1.us.stratum.dedicatedpool.com:3364 -u ********** -p ***********

Or is this just the expected hash rate after the nFactor change? 160 is pretty sad...
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!