 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
The staking interest increase has attracted a lot of new members, but I prefer LP Staking as it is more profitable than just Staking. It's the same in all DeFi projects and that's okay.
If I'm not mistaken LP Staking now brings 100% in NBU tokens. This is not bad considering the fact that the price of NBU tokens is gradually strengthening according to statistics on Uniswap. I am sure that after switching to BSC, interest in the project will be higher |
|
|
|
I have not seen similar projects in the industry of decentralized games, so there is no way to learn from experience and mistakes. Perhaps there were attempts to implement something like that, but it did not come to the implementation of the finished product. The STONE developer will have to independently test the platform and fix bugs that he will encounter.
There are special people for testing, or they can release the beta version and give everyone the opportunity to test it, as other developers do. I hope that in addition to Ethereum, the EOS, NEO, Stellar and Tron protocols will be integrated into this platform. |
|
|
|
|
I used the numbers of this service and was satisfied. For a small price, I purchased numbers for registration on those sites in which I needed. Very convenient and helpful service
|
|
|
|
There are already many decentralized games in which the function of exchanging for example TRX for internal game tokens is implemented, but this is not enough. Therefore, I think that the STONE platform will solve a number of issues related to the exchange of tokens and increase their liquidity.
I prefer Ethereum over TRX as it suits me better. If the STONE platform is implemented, it will greatly facilitate the use of cryptocurrencies in decentralized games. |
|
|
|
I do agree, we have nothing to discuss if there will be no demo version at least of what he is talking about. Because if only idea, then the chance that it will not ever materialize is always there. So until he can offer a much well founded concept along with the actual app, then that's the time that we can discuss about this idea of him.
You are right, the idea is interesting, but we need a test version of the platform or at least a development plan for this platform. Without this, it is difficult to assess its potential and understand whether there is a chance to realize it. I also saw many interesting ideas, but not many of them were able to implement. |
|
|
|
I agree with you, such projects are really very interesting and I also support the development of this project as I want to see a finished workable product.
I think first you need to get more information about the plans of the developer of this framework in order to assess the perspective. I would also like to hear the opinion of game developers about this framework. I agree with you, the decentralized games industry will get an additional impetus for development thanks to such solutions. Cryptocurrencies will also receive more interest from gamers and investors due to increased liquidity. |
|
|
|
I think that this development will be of interest to some game developers, as it will attract more interest in their games from the cryptocurrency community. For a long time I thought that it would be better for game developers to use cryptocurrencies that already exist on the market instead of internal currency or game points. This would increase the liquidity of most of the coins and tokens involved in games.
Projects like these can really have a positive impact on the gaming and cryptocurrency industries. Therefore, I support this idea and want to see its implementation. In addition to the gaming industry, it will have a positive effect on the cryptocurrency industry and, in the long term, on the price of ETH and other coins, the blockchains of which will be used. Cryptocurrencies need such tools as they need more new users and more adoption. |
|
|
|
I read about this "x*y=k market maker" idea in one of the posts Buterin wrote, but then it looked like just an idea that a small number of people could understand. With the advent of Uniswap, this idea has received a real shell and has shown itself in action.
At that time, many projects did not seem as promising as they are now, so it takes time to implement this idea in a finished product in order to assess its perspective. But I have no doubt that this is a useful tool to help cryptocurrencies and the gaming industry grow. |
|
|
|
Talking about your project on bitcointalk is not really a great idea, if it was for people here they would have said satoshi was an idiot for working on bitcoin before he released it if he ended up asking their advice here and they would have laughed at his face and few years later try to get as much bitcoin as they can.
However you have to actually work on something a bit further than just half a page of explanation before you can get a good review as well, even if what you are working on is bad or great it needs to be a bit further developed in, otherwise it is just an idea and we all know ideas worth absolutely zero and all ideas are horrible until execution shows how it is not bad. So I would say work on this a bit more, have some design and some details and share it again, that might get different results.
The forum was created to discuss cryptocurrencies and projects associated with them. Therefore, it seems to me that if this project is related to cryptocurrencies, then it should be on bitcointalk. I'm interested in reading about ideas like the one suggested by the author of this topic. |
|
|
|
|
I have always liked projects that are trying to combine cryptocurrencies with the gaming industry, as cryptocurrencies need liquidity and wider application, and the in-game industry is one of the fastest growing industries in the world.
|
|
|
|
|
