Know a project looking for a listing at a top quality exchange? 🔦👀

Look no further than BQTX.com! We will give your project the effort it deserves, with tailored packages to suit your needs 💪

Spread the word and tell them to email us now!

Our exchange has been successfully upgraded! 🌐

Check it out today and let us know what you think!

BQTX.com

It's looking pretty darn good if you ask us.. 🔥🔥🔥
Not only is it smoother and easier to navigate, it now features an upgraded security system to better protect our users

Locking up this thread again because people are apparently not reading that the deadline has long since elapsed and dispute addressed. If there's a need to contact us, our PM is open

Sorry, the tokens has been sent. You should have cross-checked your entry all this while.

Plagarism/Rephrasing of the WP

Rephrasing of the WP, word for word copy/structure of: https://jeaniferr.blogspot.com/2019/02/bqt-social-p2p-crypto-exchange-and.html

Unintelligible. Using the voice changer makes it impossible to understand a single original sentence. The intelligible ones came from reading the WP.

Plagiarized content from official documentation

Will look into it

Asked for link, not screenshot. Turns out it's just a translation of official documentation


Will look into it

Will look into it

Incomplete report submission

Will look into it.

Sorry, no links to verify participation. No telegram activity either

Submitting the same content as four different entries was what led to your disqualification because it was taken to mean you wanted to game the system by presenting the same thing as 4 different things

Rephrasing of the WP, word for word copy/structure of: https://jeaniferr.blogspot.com/2019/02/bqt-social-p2p-crypto-exchange-and.html

Will look into it

Sorry, the tokens have been sent. You should have cross-checked your entry all this while.

You also submitted as numbers 1835, 1836, 1837, 1889, 1948, 1950. Same content and all of them a plagiarism of official documentation.

Sorry, the tokens have been sent. You should have cross-checked your entry all this while.

Your twitter account is not accessible, but your facebook activities are still live and will be looked into

Your dispute submission has no link to report for verification

Personal twitter and facebook content are inaccessible/unavailable respectively.

Twitter is inaccessible, but your facebook activities are still live and will be looked into

Summary
22 claims were filed. Only 6 appear to have valid grounds for review. These are the claims that got the "Will look into it" response. Their claims have been submitted to the team for further action. Will update this post with further directives/update

The one week for dispute claims have now elapsed. Will be locking this thread for a week to investigate reports. Thank you

Reserved

For all bounty claims and dispute, we have created a thread here for the community. Please post all claims and dispute there

For all bounty claims and dispute, we have created a thread here for the community. Please post all claims and dispute there

For all bounty claims and dispute, we have created a thread here for the community. Please post all claims and dispute there

Following the successful resolution of the audit and distribution of BQTX/IOU bounty and the successfully distribution of the 50% bonuses according to the terms of agreement, we've now created this thread for those who may have erroneously failed the audit and have proof to back it up.

The audited spreadsheet can be found here:

BQT: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PSQxHv6EnQaaSVWdYg4YzbiEKWbkwfBM/view?usp=sharing

IOU: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1alAtz60Fbmw9NYGFeOAjkj0oOTX1yg1Y/view?usp=sharing

if you are certain that the disqualification was an error or wrong, please visit this thread and submit the following:

- Spreadsheet number
- Links to the report (Please note that all links must be live and verifiable for any of the tasks in dispute - twitter, facebook, medium, golos, steemit and others)
- ETH address

Claimants have ONE WEEK to submit their dispute on the thread.

We also want to categorically state that tokens recovered from cheaters, scammers, and unclaimed will eventually make it way back to the community through several community-based incentives including brand new campaign. And yes, we've learnt a lot from this to avoid any misstep from future event.

Thank you all for your continued support.

First off, we'd like to apologize for how our last communication to the community came across - frayed nerves and wits end. We've now come to understand that when dealing with decentralized entities to resolve conflicts, there's a lot of giving and taking involved. It was wrong of us to assume a finality to our stance rather than continuing to dialogue with the pillars of the community. To this end, we wish to tender our unreserved apology to Talkstar who never really gave up on us and continued to admonish us to do right by the community rather than focusing on grievances without. All the more remarkable when you consider the fact that he has no stakes in the bounty. His concern was for the community and doing right by the community first.

Our thanks also goes to Coolcryptovator for stepping in to listen to our side of the story and helping us come to an agreement on what is fair to both parties despite several hurdles. We also own xtraelv a mention for his previous guidance and mediation.

Hopefully, this is the beginning of a brand, new chapter with the community where our focus is now more hands-on rather than mediated/via proxy.

Thank you all for your various contributions, criticism, and feedback

Here is official position of the company:

1. We paid a lot in SIG during campaign
2. We had issues with bounty spreadsheets left by Zapo
3. We hired an auditor and identified spam/bot traffic/etc and fixed the amounts per posts (paying 2000+ per post was clear mistake on rough spreadsheet Zapo managed as example and he did specify that before leaving)
4. And we actually paid the bounties to those that delivered while striked the others based on the spreadsheet which was consisted of LOTS of SCAM
5. If anyone has specific issue they can click on their link and dispute directly on telegram channel and we will act accordingly.
6. Stake budgets were advertised as total available but not as for distribution with multipliers and we stated it many times on telegram support channel to participants when inquired... a while ago.  It would be unfair for the company to have a bounty campaign full of scam so that later we would move scam stakes to others.  Company would never agree to that and would never start such a bounty.
7. We would be willing to pay 20% premium to those that undisputed in good faith in order to close this threat.  Otherwise let it be... we have done our best and done it in crypto winter while everyone was cheering and hungry... your choice if you would like to give legitimacy to BTT as a marketing tool or would like to prove once again that "no good deed goes unpunished".
8. Either way we are appreciative to those that honestly participated and delivered and wish those participants best of success.

Getting this addressed by the auditors. They initially claimed Zapo miscalculated... however, will get clarifications rather than vague recollections.

Will also like to thank you guys for actively investigating this too. If we'd known just how active the community here was, we probably would have gone through the community rather than the long-winded route we took

Here are the links to the audited spreadsheets, color coded by the auditors

BQT: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PSQxHv6EnQaaSVWdYg4YzbiEKWbkwfBM/view?usp=sharing

IOU: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1alAtz60Fbmw9NYGFeOAjkj0oOTX1yg1Y/view?usp=sharing

Putting up the sheets and getting the distribution info shortly

No intention to split hair, but apparently, startups are never the victim it seems. We relied on Zapo to interface with BTT community since he claimed it was his thing (and we've now realized that the faux air of mysticism his types tend to exude regarding BTT activities is basically bait and switch). Should anybody be held responsible? Zapo, of course. But then, who's going to hold him responsible?

Might as well argue that he's a product of this community and the activities of his kinds have greatly sullied the reputation (at least the outsider's perception) of what this place stands for. We've been made to understand that the community polices its own, but being a public forum, the policing can only go that far.
However, it kind of stings being told: "That's not our business how much you have paid Zapo...".

OK, we got dumped.
OK, we have nothing to show for it.
OK, we are trying to maintain our integrity by resolving the mess and paying the tokens allocated to those who upheld their end of the bargain too.
What is not OK, is we paying to accounts that have been flagged as scams or cheat.

We draw the line there.

The spreadsheet by Zapo is still accessible for anybody that feels they are capable of auditing it better.

If the community insist on making the audited sheet available, we will do so and explain the parameters involved. However, we do not have the bandwidth to answer why this person or that didn't make the list. Would have been easier for us to just jump ship, but it's best to be the change you want to see and there's no bigger change we want to see now more than crypto community going back to its roots of integrity.

Following up our conversation with Talkstar, we've decided to come set the record straight summarily.

About 20 BTC was paid to Zapo for the signature campaign and we got zero KPI off that. Similar results with the token bounty, and while we can still blame Zapo for not completing the data collection, the fact that the event was rife with scams and cheats.
We could have stuck to our guns - if we're playing by some hard set rules - about the bounty manager not delivering and let it die a natural death, after all, who's getting negged? It's the BM. The incomplete data was there alongside the numerous messages we sent that was never responded to.

But we didn't.

The management decided to rescue the situation and uphold its end of the bargain by taking on the extra financial responsibility of hiring auditors to complete and audit the sheet after months of waiting on Zapo to no avail. However, completing and auditing a bounty that ended almost six months prior proved to be a daunting task especially with bounty hunters shifting allegiance and the hard-nosed attitude of social media platform resulting in dead links and missing data. We also created a new telegram group to directly address participants, only to find out that out of the roughly 900+ members in the original group, only 100+ were actually "human".

With no measurable KPI and less than 10% of the deliverables promised, we had to critically evaluate the situation. Yes, hard work should be rewarded and goodwill fostered with the community. However, when community participation is rife with scams, cheats, and zero engagement, something has to give.

Yes, crypto has its own fair share of scams and cheats and the good work/goodwill of the community being exploited by nefarious actors. However, it seems most are overlooking the fact that we are also the victim here, sinking manpower and operational costs into doing right by the community.

And therein lies the problem. Doing right.

It will be unfair to not reward those who diligently took their time to support the project. However, we will not be empowering scammers and cheaters by giving them what they never sowed. Accountability works both ends and so does the responsibility. We took on the responsibility of accepting the fact that someone took us for a ride and we still have an obligation to fulfil to the community. However, the community too has to accept the fact that is was "one of their own too". Hence, the "meet-me-half-way" approach we've taken to resolving the situation.

We are now distributing tokens to those who passed the audit (and we're already getting "which exchange list" and "how much price" queries in. Awesome support). For the sake of sanity, we wouldn't be making the spreadsheet public (Talkstar and xtraelv have seen it though) because not everyone is going to make the cut and translating that into several languages 24/7 is beyond our abilities. However, if someone feels they can audit the original sheet, they are welcome to try. It's still in the bounty thread created by Zapo.
We recognize the fact that there's no marketing strategy that can trump community goodwill, hence the reason why we've implemented a 5-tier referral reward system that is based on the number of BQTX tokens held. We will also be rolling out other bonuses and engagements for those who have grown to become a part of our ecosystem.

Our purpose on this thread is to set the record straight. Yes, some blockchain startups have been less than honourable to bounty hunters and a few bad eggs have spoilt the basket. Is it possible that not everyone will be happy with this outcome? Yes, it's true. Sadly, this is the best we can do without committing seppuku.

We'd like to acknowledge the effort of Talkstar to stand up for the community and xtraelv for his mediation and willingness to hear us out. The community can certain do with more folks like you