Ladies and gentlemen! A terrible event occurred in the crypto community, which led to a violation of the rights of investors and owners of BitcoinHD coins. Due to the illegal actions of the MEXC exchange and the DePC team (old name BHD1), a rebranding was carried out in violation of the rights of investors and owners of BitcoinHD coins, which led to the zero of their coins in the new DePC network, although DePC team early promised to exchange all BHD coins for new DePC coins, but didn't do this. In particular, you can read here to familiarize yourself with the situation: https://github.com/DePINC/depinc/issues/6Today, the BitcoinHD network is working, the explorer is also working: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bhd/We need to find like-minded people who will make a simple website and continue to support the BitcoinHD project and help make the coin popular, so that various exchanges will list this BitcoinHD coin. Here are some videos that were popular when the BHD network started. http://youtube.com/watch?v=FHh5lAx5o3Qhttp://youtube.com/watch?v=d916SBET-nEhttp://youtube.com/watch?v=V0yrmSQAaWQhttp://youtube.com/watch?v=n2Mtf8C9784http://youtube.com/watch?v=qCLouoX2-tIhttp://youtube.com/watch?v=Yvm2nmCD6Wghttp://youtube.com/watch?v=x-FmgH1UqCMhttp://youtube.com/watch?v=YuieWJhA_yIhttp://youtube.com/watch?v=DYyKRoQ1gNAIt is possible that the CHIA Network team will pay attention to its younger brothers and help or absorb the BitcoinHD project, but will not leave investors and coin owners unattended. If the CHIA team can help make BitcoinHD mining possible make a dual mining with CHIA coin, it would be very good for all investors and owners of BitcoinHD coins. Everyone who can be useful for the development of the project will be paid a reward in BitcoinHD coins, I can invest some of the coins I have in this event to save BitcoinHD. |
|
|
|
Listreceivedbyaddress
I thought that in the folder with the program there is some kind of dirty file that can be deleted so as not to see this garbage. |
|
|
|
О, нет. Наверное стоит спросить в первую очередь в их сообществах? У них есть дискорд или телеграм?
Есть, но в далекие времена меня там забанили из-за хейта, потому что они писали про этот объединенный майнинг еще 2 года назад и только сейчас начали что-то делать. Говнюки. |
|
|
|
Вопрос: что в нём не так, почему программа майнера выдает ошибку и ругается на конфигурационный файл?
Как ругается то?  Разработчики подонки, не отвечают. Уже 25 майнеров тестируют и монетки получают, а у меня с 20 февраля ничего не получается :-(  |
|
|
|
У меня не получается (линукса нет, а под виндой не получается, программа майнер выдает ошибку, что конфиг ей не нравится).Делал по инструкции BHD Mining Tutorial（win） https://medium.com/@bitcoinhd.community/bhd-mining-tutorial-win-98a4b1f86335BHD Mining Tutorial（Linux ） https://medium.com/@bitcoinhd.community/bhd-mining-tutorial-linux-a6622bb66e3chttps://bhd.one https://github.com/bhdone/btchd/releases У кого получится настроить, делимся скриншотами и инструкцией.Мой конфигурационный файл (тут в теме, слова в своей seed фразе я намеренно изменил, чтобы форумчане ненароком не пользовались моим кошельком).{ "reward": "2NFVe8ercqZhUNip95dSngKfk2hfu49NfRH", "seed": "draft deer machine worry way trigger spice exotic abstract place clip orchard you orbit milk aisle biology light human virus can federal vocal genuine", "testnet": true, "noproxy": true, "plotPath": [“D:/chia”], "rpc": { “host”: “http://127.0.0.1:18732", "user": "", "password": "" } } Вопрос: что в нём не так, почему программа майнера выдает ошибку и ругается на конфигурационный файл?
|
|
|
|
|
$9d4164a034dfdb82 // cry_salt - salt from wallet.dat
$307949 // cry_rounds - number of rounds, nDerivationIterations from wallet.dat
_________
Thanks for your reply. You are a real HERO and I hope that soon you will have such a status on this forum.
I researched the "cry_rounds - number of rounds" parameter and realized that the smaller this number, the faster the password guessing speed.
I don’t know anything about the “cry_salt” parameter, maybe it also somehow helps to understand or find out at least some information that will help to guess the password.
|
|
|
|
|
No, nothing wrong with my head. But I can read and you stated, “ Ask Me to guess what Puzzle will be solved next? My answer: Puzzle #120 :-)” and I am saying you were wrong. #120 was not solved next…#64 was solved next.
[/quote]
What does it matter? You're an idiot? Can't you see the pattern I wrote about in my post? Here everyone is idiots like you or there are smart people and they understand that solving the puzzle after #64 is the work of the creators of this puzzle. You have to be an idiot not to get it. Those creators could read my post and solve puzzle #64 and then solve puzzle #120 so the idiots on this forum would waste their energy and try to crack the private key. No need to go on about the creators of the puzzle, they just scoff at you. We need to demand a simple task, for example, for miners who have 100 video cards, so that in 1 or 2 weeks they can open the next task and solve the puzzle, but what has been happening here for the last 5 years is not a show, but idiocy and cretinism and a waste time
|
|
|
|
|
- longer than usual but the essentials -- because I use old soft
where is "encrypted master key"
where is "padding bytes"
where is "salt"
where is "iteration"
and what does this mean and how can it help?
I noticed that some parameter affects the degree of encryption and different wallets have a different password search speed when I using the same power.
|
|
|
|
March 14, 2022, 08:41:20 AMAsk Me to guess what Puzzle will be solved next? My answer: Puzzle #120 :-) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5389596Reserved for other sponsors. Special BTC address provided: 1BTCHomezHpFezxGEsXEkKp2iEv6bVRBfZ Write an answer so that my topic is relevant and people can talk about my theory. Thanks! The problem is…you were WRONG! #64 was solved before #120 Soooo do you want to try again and guess the next challenge to be solved? ______________________ I did not say nothing about #64!
I only talked about #120, that it will be opened by the developers themselves ...
Do you have problems with your head? Does anyone else think that I was mistaken? |
|
|
|
March 14, 2022, 08:41:20 AMAsk Me to guess what Puzzle will be solved next? My answer: Puzzle #120 :-) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5389596Reserved for other sponsors. Special BTC address provided: 1BTCHomezHpFezxGEsXEkKp2iEv6bVRBfZ Write an answer so that my topic is relevant and people can talk about my theory. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
I spent many days searching for information and gave up, I decided to put a question here:
Here is a HASH of a real password-protected wallet with a zero balance, created for this experiment.
Bitcoin Core version 22 was used for encryption.
For convenience, let's arrange it vertically (by fragments):
$bitcoin
$64
$9baaabed8bde61f4da580ff22905fd2dab69b6193bb365f0fdfbc540ff9f20fc
$16
$9d4164a034dfdb82
$307949
$96
$0497430f102ff66a1556910eb9b9f3277cc38f437fb79f1d78345c770ac918cba04e48e785e29cc169a4e3c0b88b39f5
$66
$03fff614df1bd468aa061bec32eff7b14c42a0a3d0df7d984a7b74a30a99f0ec87
Here is the HASH of the same wallet, encrypted with the same password, but a few minutes later!
For convenience, let's arrange it vertically (by fragments):
$bitcoin
$64
$da208ddba0272b9fd6f3d144b01ffd9ac862909547a8f40909f6053cb82377af
$16
$1e3edd4b096fe67d
$309436
$96
$7f41727bbe91875979a7cd8422c758bec849c28f4c2399d31583b9756df5bd5ab13ba4bdb30e21f9b7fdba5f210820a3
$66
$03ffed46dcde1175aa57a2a27a38923a8bf97666d1959d80cee2487b8395d25acb
Question: what exactly is encrypted in these HASH fragments (except private keys),
I used to do the same experiments on old versions of Bitcoin Core (2014-2015-2016-2017)
and only 1 fragment changed in the HASH string, not all, as you see in this example.
_____________________________________________________________________________
Here is a HASH of a real password-protected wallet with a zero balance, created for this experiment.
Bitcoin Core version 14 was used for encryption.
$bitcoin$64$c4ab02b223aab0a41558ab4ac04dec75768bf940bb35b664264bc4ff4e4b8e92$16$6d50f442918a5c9d$178099$96$e52515510f4ea8c8f4990f9cff3617353d277f43f83c998124accfb00ccb9808481f1520625bf79f68eb90914843213d$66$03ff307c1a0444dc016f6cef217cc5f1b6b4a6e244b088a1ab2939205eb8e974dc
For convenience, let's arrange it vertically (by fragments):
$bitcoin
$64
$c4ab02b223aab0a41558ab4ac04dec75768bf940bb35b664264bc4ff4e4b8e92
$16
$6d50f442918a5c9d
$178099
$96
$e52515510f4ea8c8f4990f9cff3617353d277f43f83c998124accfb00ccb9808481f1520625bf79f68eb90914843213d
$66
$03ff307c1a0444dc016f6cef217cc5f1b6b4a6e244b088a1ab2939205eb8e974dc
Here is the HASH of the same wallet, encrypted with the same password, but a few minutes later!
$bitcoin$64$c4ab02b223aab0a41558ab4ac04dec75768bf940bb35b664264bc4ff4e4b8e92$16$6d50f442918a5c9d$178099$96$e52515510f4ea8c8f4990f9cff3617353d277f43f83c998124accfb00ccb9808481f1520625bf79f68eb90914843213d$66$03ff307c1a0444dc016f6cef217cc5f1b6b4a6e244b088a1ab2939205eb8e974dc
For convenience, let's arrange it vertically (by fragments):
$bitcoin
$64
$c4ab02b223aab0a41558ab4ac04dec75768bf940bb35b664264bc4ff4e4b8e92
$16
$6d50f442918a5c9d
$178099
$96
$e52515510f4ea8c8f4990f9cff3617353d277f43f83c998124accfb00ccb9808481f1520625bf79f68eb90914843213d
$66
$03ff307c1a0444dc016f6cef217cc5f1b6b4a6e244b088a1ab2939205eb8e974dc
Here is the HASH of the same wallet, encrypted with other password (I change 1 symbol only), but a few minutes later!
$bitcoin$64$7d7ef3e7aa475bfda10b2e7b25dadb58999cecf02f843695f55e218c27beda77$16$9f6c6111015576da$343914$96$3b2a1a52eb7d74a6cdf9368fa3d13cd89e2131645c44c86d51d0bcb5a7a296349108dd7cd5a90ff7e6b0156754af5d58$66$03f812147b50b630f391b3fba520fce93fe1bf52546f59c52aaa637cb2386f0f46
For convenience, let's arrange it vertically (by fragments):
$bitcoin
$64
$7d7ef3e7aa475bfda10b2e7b25dadb58999cecf02f843695f55e218c27beda77
$16
$9f6c6111015576da
$343914
$96
$3b2a1a52eb7d74a6cdf9368fa3d13cd89e2131645c44c86d51d0bcb5a7a296349108dd7cd5a90ff7e6b0156754af5d58
$66
$03f812147b50b630f391b3fba520fce93fe1bf52546f59c52aaa637cb2386f0f46
_____________________________________________________________________________
Here is a HASH of a real password-protected wallet with a zero balance, created for this experiment.
Bitcoin Core version 12 was used for encryption.
$bitcoin$64$2ae7cab98ca52e4fb21634ff5f5a6f572d9ded651f446fba9a822a8a9a2cbd84$16$e5567d452f87bddd$312500$96$d832ab6eb273815fd8c4e52f040b038896ec857f28669dbdda8e6c328d1f1595b5771228ed1e53f4bf6ac3e8d6566fc1$66$03fe3552acd85983c028f03080bb3501698353fc19c636e0ebee063d15ed49df88
For convenience, let's arrange it vertically (by fragments):
$bitcoin
$64
$2ae7cab98ca52e4fb21634ff5f5a6f572d9ded651f446fba9a822a8a9a2cbd84
$16
$e5567d452f87bddd
$312500
$96
$d832ab6eb273815fd8c4e52f040b038896ec857f28669dbdda8e6c328d1f1595b5771228ed1e53f4bf6ac3e8d6566fc1
$66
$03fe3552acd85983c028f03080bb3501698353fc19c636e0ebee063d15ed49df88
Here is the HASH of the same wallet, encrypted with the same password, but a few minutes later!
$bitcoin$64$1716a3b4db5ee42fe7acfd929de2ef7b199bb5b256486d1403a4c359f5cf343f$16$2b8d4e771fd6c519$351940$96$37ae511cae81882406a6cebe28f51207336652e1b79c621cd1b7a1c5d542db3cc55f059ab3795520f711f9343efb65c4$66$03fe3552acd85983c028f03080bb3501698353fc19c636e0ebee063d15ed49df88
For convenience, let's arrange it vertically (by fragments):
$bitcoin
$64
$1716a3b4db5ee42fe7acfd929de2ef7b199bb5b256486d1403a4c359f5cf343f
$16
$2b8d4e771fd6c519
$351940
$96
$37ae511cae81882406a6cebe28f51207336652e1b79c621cd1b7a1c5d542db3cc55f059ab3795520f711f9343efb65c4
$66
$03fe3552acd85983c028f03080bb3501698353fc19c636e0ebee063d15ed49df88
Here is the HASH of the same wallet, encrypted with other password (I change 1 symbol only), but a few minutes later!
$bitcoin$64$41e8fb39b7b2cd8b3560ef1556b0f0208db7d84fd2162ed6aa47285d5faaa5e8$16$6a5816f31e14df19$302578$96$f07a793234669ad4be9a2a1b7f4e5fe346b8bcc6f22d5db03313580f75fec7e2104ca384cfe506cdf04cd2b458411fe6$66$03fe3552acd85983c028f03080bb3501698353fc19c636e0ebee063d15ed49df88
For convenience, let's arrange it vertically (by fragments):
$bitcoin
$64
$41e8fb39b7b2cd8b3560ef1556b0f0208db7d84fd2162ed6aa47285d5faaa5e8
$16
$6a5816f31e14df19
$302578
$96
$f07a793234669ad4be9a2a1b7f4e5fe346b8bcc6f22d5db03313580f75fec7e2104ca384cfe506cdf04cd2b458411fe6
$66
$03fe3552acd85983c028f03080bb3501698353fc19c636e0ebee063d15ed49df88
|
|
|
|
|
Здравствуйте уважаемые форумчане!
Много суток потратил на поиск информации и сдался, решил написать вопрос сюда:
Перед вами HASH реального запароленного кошелька с нулевым балансом, созданного для эксперимента.
$bitcoin$64$9baaabed8bde61f4da580ff22905fd2dab69b6193bb365f0fdfbc540ff9f20fc$16$9d4164a034dfdb82$307949$96$0497430f102ff66a1556910eb9b9f3277cc38f437fb79f1d78345c770ac918cba04e48e785e29cc169a4e3c0b88b39f5$66$03fff614df1bd468aa061bec32eff7b14c42a0a3d0df7d984a7b74a30a99f0ec87
Для удобства, расположим его вертикально (по фрагментам):
$bitcoin
$64
$9baaabed8bde61f4da580ff22905fd2dab69b6193bb365f0fdfbc540ff9f20fc
$16
$9d4164a034dfdb82
$307949
$96
$0497430f102ff66a1556910eb9b9f3277cc38f437fb79f1d78345c770ac918cba04e48e785e29cc169a4e3c0b88b39f5
$66
$03fff614df1bd468aa061bec32eff7b14c42a0a3d0df7d984a7b74a30a99f0ec87
Вот HASH этого же самого кошелька, зашифрованного тем же паролем, но несколько минут спустя!
$bitcoin$64$da208ddba0272b9fd6f3d144b01ffd9ac862909547a8f40909f6053cb82377af$16$1e3edd4b096fe67d$309436$96$7f41727bbe91875979a7cd8422c758bec849c28f4c2399d31583b9756df5bd5ab13ba4bdb30e21f9b7fdba5f210820a3$66$03ffed46dcde1175aa57a2a27a38923a8bf97666d1959d80cee2487b8395d25acb
Для удобства, расположим его вертикально (по фрагментам):
$bitcoin
$64
$da208ddba0272b9fd6f3d144b01ffd9ac862909547a8f40909f6053cb82377af
$16
$1e3edd4b096fe67d
$309436
$96
$7f41727bbe91875979a7cd8422c758bec849c28f4c2399d31583b9756df5bd5ab13ba4bdb30e21f9b7fdba5f210820a3
$66
$03ffed46dcde1175aa57a2a27a38923a8bf97666d1959d80cee2487b8395d25acb
Для шифрования использовался Bitcoin Core версия 22.
Вопрос: что именно шифруется в этих фрагментах HASH (кроме приватных ключей),
раньше я делал такие же эксперименты на старых версиях Bitcoin Core (2014-2015-2016-2017 годов)
и в строке HASH менялся только 1 фрагмент, а не все, как вы видите в этом примере.
Если интересно, могу провести эксперимент заново (со старыми программами), но для этого мне
понадобится время для синхронизации (папка с блокчейном от новой версии Bitcoin Core) почему-то не подходит для старых версий
и при попытке её подложить (в свойствах ярлыка "-datadir="), портится и тогда уже приходится везде синхронизироваться заново.
|
|
|
|
Delisting from Binance seems like the end of the road from here,
a 700btc marketcap project that is traded on binance with low volume simply means there is no interest for the tech.
You were probably born yesterday and don't remember anything, or you have amnesia. Even before listing on Binance, BEAM coins were sold on other exchanges for more than $1. I think the delisting is due to big players who want to take coins away from weak hamster players. For a long time, big players couldn't force small players to sold their coins and the only thing that came to their mind was to delist them. Personally, I am very pleased that I bought these coins for less than 5 cents. Not so long ago I could only dream about it and now my dreams have come true. You have to be a fool not to understand how cool this project is and that the price of this coin can easily reach $100 in the next altcoin season. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
