 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
It works now: https://blockchain.info/de/tx/64d45ef207f6b283540db006bf6ddd43a1c312ca826e08336053fe7f6bab0b8a (my first transaction signed with my own library  ) The txs produced now look like this: 0100000001883971b9025799b61040fdd0bc516a4c631f8753f689962fc72980de4f2aabc8000000006b483045022100f24f95da3b0df769a79af676c6d0cbd781fa7c0d04be1712c3b148b53472fad702200dc0b3635bba2a0af15104d86ef86ccc74811287184956aa4b612e041e5a5ace01210340af8583e795691debf6331605a444a1bd2ae3e3978b38ff1d2c7f69443b6c01ffffffff01905f0100000000001976a914b7675e0b90a09cb97674702be07b119c989b835088ac00000000 01000000 version
01 number of inputs
883971b9025799b61040fdd0bc516a4c631f8753f689962fc72980de4f2aabc8 reverse hash
00000000 prev. output number
6b size of scriptSig
48 push data 72
3045022100f24f95da3b0df769a79af676c6d0cbd781fa7c0d04be1712c3b148b53472fad702200dc0b3635bba2a0af15104d86ef86ccc74811287184956aa4b612e041e5a5ace01 sig + hash all
21 push data 33
0340af8583e795691debf6331605a444a1bd2ae3e3978b38ff1d2c7f69443b6c01 pubKey
ffffffff sequence
01 number of outputs
905f010000000000 value
19 scriptPubKey size
76a914b7675e0b90a09cb97674702be07b119c989b835088ac scriptPubKey
00000000 locktime So it seems to work now. I don't know what went wrong with the pubKey (I'm using openssl for all the crypto. Thx to all |
|
|
|
Hi, I'm writing a c++ library to sign Bitcoin transactions (you can find it here: https://github.com/sgeisler/EasyBitcoin). I tryed to send a transaction from 1HikVCL5PsR75toN23yEifLqmg8uXAepoz to some other address. At the moment only the code to sign the input is implemented, so I first created a raw transaction with coinbin and then replaced the unsigned input with the signed input generated by my script. 0100000001883971b9025799b61040fdd0bc516a4c631f8753f689962fc72980de4f2aabc8000000006a47304402207a57c1db269e2ab4706279309a4d1d91112478d92132c2580d4b6f21670dce0502200590c8be6be1616c41db4663800c3b3d9d36ffa0e4d1c7b08082b0b00f679f9a01210440af8583e795691debf6331605a444a1bd2ae3e3978b38ff1d2c7f69443b6c01ffffffff01905f0100000000001976a914ed25801aa39644aaa7fcef2944ba200e05e615be88ac00000000 Coinbin shows it as signed when I try to verify it: verify at coinb.inBut when I try to broadcast it it shows: 64: non-canonical I don't know what I'm doing wrong. I mainly followed this tutorial. Do you know if a bitcoin transaction debugger exists? It would be great if you could help me EDIT: I think I've found my error, I'm only hashing the input and not the whole tx (silly me), will try to hash the whole tx. But why did coinb.in accept the signature if it wasn't correct? |
|
|
|
|
'I want to link my Bitcointalk name with BTCJam's. Verification code: 59f575b2-085c-4fdb-992e-5880e6b04513'
|
|
|
|
I got my miner today and it is mining very well.
But one thing isn't ok: I can't access the web interface, I ran nmap and it said that no port is open. My workaround is simple and not really comfortable: I take the SD card and alter the SQLite databese with the configuration (Note: the database design is very very poor, has anybody else looked into it and saw how the cgminer configuration is saved?).
Did you determine where the cgminer configuration was saved? ~nh It is saved in a SQLite database /mineros/mineros.db if this File doesn't exists it is created using the .sql File in the same folder. Look into the boot.py into the start_cgminer function to see how the data from the database is used. If you want to use your own configuration for cgminer you can simply alter the startup function in the boot.py . |
|
|
|
Oh dear.....so i'm not alone it seems  I did wonder about open the case up to see if anything obvious is wrong with it. In terms of what's on the SD (sorry noob), can I simply copy from working 400 to the card of the 800? or swap them, to see if it helps. Thx. Phil. Try to swap them, if it works copy the entire working card to the other. Using windows you normally only see the bootloader partition, but you have to copy the OS partition too. Ask Google how to do that. |
|
|
|
Figuring i'd try out the 800 first and get it setup, I plugged it in, it booted but upon trying to get in via the IP, it refused to connect and looking at it with the Win7 troubleshooter, it tell me - The remote device or resource won't accept the connection. Tried the 400 and it works fine, and is happily mining as i'm typing (altough it's giving me a headache....it's REALLY loud).
Anyway, has anyone come across this issue?
Maybe I have the same problem: I got my miner today and it is mining very well.
But one thing isn't ok: I can't access the web interface, I ran nmap and it said that no port is open. My workaround is simple and not really comfortable: I take the SD card and alter the SQLite databese with the configuration (Note: the database design is very very poor, has anybody else looked into it and saw how the cgminer configuration is saved?).
@Giorgio: I really hope that Bitmine will give us a full image of the OS and not only a tar-ball with the files to replace.
|
|
|
|
I got my miner today and it is mining very well. But one thing isn't ok: I can't access the web interface, I ran nmap and it said that no port is open. My workaround is simple and not really comfortable: I take the SD card and alter the SQLite databese with the configuration (Note: the database design is very very poor, has anybody else looked into it and saw how the cgminer configuration is saved?). @Giorgio: I really hope that Bitmine will give us a full image of the OS and not only a tar-ball with the files to replace.  |
|
|
|
Bitmine: update the news section  Ok, this is really brazenly. They posted this some weeks ago, deleted it and now they are publishing it again. I don't know what to think about this, were they only too optimistic? It's a bit weird. |
|
|
|
|
Today I got my shipping confirmation for the order #319*.
400GH upgraded to 600GH
|
|
|
|
|
Hi xray, did you read the TOS you agreed to? They write clearly that you can't get refund till the order is 61 days late. They even interpretate their TOS in a way that you have to wait 71 days before you can get refund (we discussed this some time ago).
We all invested in a very young company and in their TOS they pointed out how late they might be, so we knew the risks.
Please don't spam. You won't get refunded because of spamming. I'm waiting too for my order, but it doesn't changes anything if we freak out about that.
regards
comp006
|
|
|
|
|
Today I called them, because on last friday I got a mail saying that my miner would be shipped till tuesday. But what happened? Nothing!
Today they told me that at the moment hashing boards are missing. Maybe they will continue producing tomorrow, but it would be more likely that I will get the confirmation mail on monday.
My Order:
#31**
placed on November 26, 2013
400 Gh/s with cpp 600 Gh/s
I have to say that the support staff was very polite and I hadn't to wait long in the waiting loop.
regards
comp006
|
|
|
|
|
I think the main problem is that the more people use this chart the more it will be wrong because it can't take its own influence to the market into calculation. This is the main problem with EVERY public prediction.
|
|
|
|
some news ? shipping dates or did somebody get the miner ?
I have the order number #31** (1st week of February Batch). I called them on monday and they told me that I would recieve my miner in last Week of March or if I'm lucky even faster. Hey all...
So i am back from weekend...
please stay away a bit longer (forever?) only useless posts, better you stay away... We have freedom of speech, so you can post this, but in my oppinion this isn't really usefull. Nobody of us knows the absolute truth. We only can guess whats going on inside Bitmine. So you can't claim that Bitmine is a scam, did you asked a lawyer? We all accepted that there may be delays. Maybe a lawyer can find a vulnerability in the ToS, without a break of the ToS you can't call them scammers. The law only rarely corresponds to the general sense of justice. I think if they really would be scammers they wouldn't deliver even the first device, they would sit on their small and beautifull island. In my oppinion it would be the best to only gather information in this thread and don't repeat things we can't proof 100% (scam or not scam, from my point of view it's a bit like religious war, everyone thinks he owns the truth, but nobody can proof  ). I'm no fan of Bitmine and their practices, but I'm not driven by rage, so let's all calm down and watch this objectively. I hope the best and expect the worst. Sincerely comp006 |
|
|
|
you cant do such things, close your company and mean this have no consequences
When did they closed their company? |
|
|
|
|
Suing them now is not the most intelligent action. It would be simply revenge. You would not get your device nor your money faster. I am not a lawyer, but I think you can sue them later with the same chances of winning.
Why I'm writing this? Yea, I don't want money back, I want to get my miner and I think that suing them will slow this whole thing down or they may go bankrupt.
For your information, I'm waiting for my february week 1 miner and they said me that it will be shipped in mid of April. I'm not happy with the situation too, but please don't make it worse.
|
|
|
|
Hi, I'm reading here now for a while. First it's good that the miners are shipped at all, even if the production capacity is very low. But when I called Bitmine I was really disappointed about the statement that my device will be shipped on 16th of April, because I called them 8 days before and they said that it will be shipped in 10 days. In the face of German energy prices I hope that it will be usefull for more than as a door stopper when it arrives.
My order
(February week 1)
Queue Position : 515
Order number : #319*
Date of payment November 26, 2013
Method of Payment : Bank/Wire Transfer
Product : desk
Hashing Power: 400
Destination: Standard Shipping
shipping 16th of April (I hope so, if they have not lied to me again)
comp006 - how do you know the delivery date is 16 April - is it maybe 16 March?? I'm really sure the guy (I do not remember who it was) at the phone said my device would be shipped on 16th of April. Hopefully he said it wrong or I've got it wrong (I was in a loud enviroment, because of the small timeframe to call them, I'm not at home at these times). I was really shocked, so I forgot to ask for validation. I will write, when I'll get my shipping confirmation. |
|
|
|
|
Hi, I'm reading here now for a while. First it's good that the miners are shipped at all, even if the production capacity is very low. But when I called Bitmine I was really disappointed about the statement that my device will be shipped on 16th of April, because I called them 8 days before and they said that it will be shipped in 10 days. In the face of German energy prices I hope that it will be usefull for more than as a door stopper when it arrives.
My order
(February week 1)
Queue Position : 515
Order number : #319*
Date of payment November 26, 2013
Method of Payment : Bank/Wire Transfer
Product : desk
Hashing Power: 400
Destination: Standard Shipping
shipping 16th of April (I hope so, if they have not lied to me again)
|
|
|
|
|
