 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »
|
may be you are correct, but by curiosity i just checked his profile some time, and explore the wallet address to find out any connection with other accounts but I got his online wallet is pretty good and heavy. Not sure if it's bought or original OG, hope he could give a better explanation. |
|
|
|
Julien_Olynpic means just to move me down in airdrop's list, but not exclude. I don't want to participate in his scam airdrop. Why doesn't he remove me from the lists?
maybe his approach was incorrect but i could not see his airdrope is scam. he paid everyone i could see. mate, he did something wrong and he already got punishment . now could you let him alone? you are trolling the forum and spaming.. |
|
|
|
I don't know how I never saw this user before, guess its because they don't post too much: ₿itcoin - registered Feb 2013 The original owner abandoned it in Feb 2018, with their last post being in 2016. It's a cool name but it was changed from "zeroday" to "₿itcoin" sometime between 2023 and 2024. This is possible because its a Donator account. BPIP shows the password was reset in July 2023, but the new owner didn't start making use of it until May of this year. They have 91 posts so far. At first they went to the WO thread to suck up for merits, which worked quite well given their name, then after joining the Stake campaign they quickly became a full-time gambling board shitposter. I changed my tag left on this account from neutral to negative. People shouldn't be allowed to enroll hacked Donator accounts into signature campaigns, and campaigns should know better than to hire them. Its a slap in the face to everyone who participates in the forum honestly with their own account they had from the beginning. There's at least 6 other bought accounts in the Stake campaign which I will get to later. Its quite obvious the manager doesn't care or engage in the slightest bit of quality control. For the longest time I had a policy of not tagging bought accounts but I am going to make an exception for the case of a bought Donator account. It seems too personal and hrash to me. Nutral was ok in my openion if you have any personal issue with him. Otherwaise without any clear scam evidance giving red is bad practice of power in my openion. hope i could see your kind heart for all member of the forum, cause bitcointalk is open place and everyone should welcome except scammer. sorry for my bad english. |
|
|
|
People are definitely embarrassed when they're caught, but you're a little different. Beware of mental illness.
CryptopreneurBrainboss should kick your ass.
At least his contribution is better than yours. lol.. CryptopreneurBrainboss is well aware of this post, cause someone already mentioned him previously.. This thread is created to correct people's behaviour, not ruin their reputation and contribution.. so CryptopreneurBrainboss is wise enough what he should do and what he should not. You don't need to spam on forum by making unnecessary posts everywhere. I could see you already posted this matter in another place where you should not be posting. I used the detector mentioned previously, but nutildah if I'm not mistaken. Is it accurate? That's something I'm not familiar with, and I'm taking this findings with a grain of salt. However, there's definitely a discrepancy between your newer and your older posts. Is it 100% AI? That's something no one can say with 100% confidence, but are you using some kind of software/platform you name it, certainly yes. I'm not straight-up accusing you, but it's no secret that your posts do look suspicious, and with your recent ones not being detected by AI, it looks like a red-flag.
Yeah, i also read his recent posts, those are cool and very good,, i didnt find any AI detection on his recent posts... if he corrected himself, then it is the main goal of this thread.. I really appreciate his contribution on the forum and hope he will never use Ai, transalator or Grammarly from now on.. Good Luck Alex077, hope brainboss will consider your case closely and give you another chance.. |
|
|
|
I have a query for @Ultegra134, @nutildah, @lovesmayfamilis, @Dark.Look, + any other member who deals with AI detection.
I checked the post history of one account (can't disclose, don't want to make the AI spammers smarter + I can't prove anything right now). Out of his last 50 posts, 32 are showing 100% detection by Sapling AI. No other detector like Copyleaks and GPTzero is showing AI. Posts are long and detailed (IMO, AI). What do you make of it?
IMO, this is a case of humanizing AI content. I mean, is it normal to have such a high amount of false positives by Sapling AI? Have you encountered this before?
I can pm the details to @Ultegra134, @nutildah, @lovesmayfamilis with the condition of confidentiality.
I am not accusing anyone right now. It is a part of my brainstorming to detect AI spammers who are using humanizers.
I'm not good at English, so I have to communicate with my client by using Google Translate. Even though I write by myself without using any AI agent, but I have noticed that most of the time, AI detector tools give false positive results when I check my writings. Example:I wrote it by myself without using any AI agent; it is totally my experience-based writing: আমি bitcointalk ফোরামের একজন মেম্বার। আমি এই ফোরামকে অনেক ভালোবাসি। আমি এই ফোরামে অনেকদিন হলো যুক্ত হয়েছি এবং এর লেখাগুলো পড়তে আমার অনেক ভালো লাগে। আমি সর্বপ্রথম আমার একজন বন্ধুর কাছে এই ফোরাম সম্পর্কে জানতে পারি, সে আমাকে শিখিয়েছে কিভাবে বিটকয়েন কিনে সঠিকভাবে হোল্ড করতে হয়। সে আমাকে কিছু বিটকয়েন কিনেদিয়েছে এবং একটি সফটওয়্যার ওয়ালেট ইনস্টল করে প্রাইভেট কীয় সংরক্ষণ করা শিখিয়েছে। পাশাপাশি আমাকে ফোরাম এ যুক্ত করে দিয়েছে যাতে করে আমি এই কমিউনিটি থেকে উপকার পেতে পারি। আমি আমার বন্ধুর প্রতি অনেক কৃতজ্ঞ। ধন্যবাদ। Translator output: I am a member of the bitcointalk forum. I love this forum. I have been a member of this forum for a long time and I really enjoy reading its posts. I first came to know about this forum from a friend of mine, he taught me how to buy and hold bitcoins properly. He bought me some bitcoins and taught me how to install a software wallet and store my private keys. He also added me to the forum so that I can benefit from this community. I am very grateful to my friend. Thank you.  AI detector Result:Copyleaks: 0% AI-generatedSapling: 100% AI-generated
By using sapling i just give an example. Not only Sapling but also other AI detector like Copyleaks/gpt zero/undetectable...... gives false positive results if you use translator tools. |
|
|
|
BTW, it is incredible the price of owl is growing every day  , I think I should have to trade this token in these bearish season of BTC. Which exchange support OWL token? I cant find any exchange that offers OWL token treading. |
|
|
|
|
