please do not compare clearnet with onion domains, dude you are a legendary member! i am stunned to see how your research results are incomplete..have a look at [banned mixer] isn't it a reputable mixer? well, if you don't know that  its jambler partnered. you seem to be looking for some benefit$$ by giving out your obvious perspectives. come back when you'll prove blender v2.0 is a ponzi or a scam. keep the letter of guarantee when you'd plan to, i hope you'd know that at least.

what's the probability of you or any other person believing in the service if you think the mixer should have been launched with a different brand name?
If you say the probability is high and name should me changed..i'd do that for users sake of course. But if the probability is low there's no point in keeping a different branding. Perception's wont change.

ideally the prime sources for newly minted coins are mostly exchanges, specially when mixing involves large sums of coins, coming back to your question, no we do not keep funds on exchanges, there are algorithms which needs to vanish your coin history in the crowd before you get new one's instead of the one's you sent, which is why we get coins from major exchanges which of course have no history and is closed to the fresh mined one.

hello, thank you for welcoming me, i find only ready aim fire users here.
currently we are based on tor only, as claiming safety and anonymity would not be possible on clearnet for users of the service.

this should answer your questions https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5263247.msg54833297#msg54833297
for any actions, if not words and conclusions you make, you need to use the service or talk to people who have tested it.
before you post any conclusion about the service, it'll be very clever, if you'd do that

Thanks for the heads up and its a great article, though its really sad when a service tells its customers that it will be available 24x7,365 days, but cannot reply to an article for its own good. but its to the point article anyway, great job.

Mixing a fee equal or lower to 0.001 is anyway free of charge.
Why btc for testing? since if it has been tested thousands of times already by devs !?
we are not here to buy followers or reviews, Blender is capable of proving authenticity with a minimum of 0.001btc.
We don't force people to believe we are legit, especially by giving out free btc to testers.
But since a Hero member insisted with such an unbelievable idea, we'll give out 10% return on transaction's equal to and not less than 0.001 btc, it wont be for any amount larger than 0.001. This stays for first 5 transactions only, if reported here or on email within a week.

Why Trust?
As a legit mixer we have Letter of Guarantee with a reputable api integration.
Lots of subs and sites to post the review and awareness if Blender v2.0 does not meet safety standards.
A test drive with Blender v2.0 with no mixing fee.

Why Anonymous?
No Logs, No Registrations
No manual time based mixing
Algorithm based automatic trigger for Pay outs, Not Admin controlled. (mixes for 1-8 hours)
Highest Time Based Mixers are Not cheap, adding on with fees per address.
We charge fixed percent and lowest for high time based mixes, regardless of number of address's.
Clean Untraceable coins.

Which country?
Telling you which countries servers are hosted would be a downer on keeping things anonymous, but since you dont care asking.
Blender 2.0 have 4 powerful parallel servers, 1 somewhere in russia and another somewhere in iceland.
we will improve infrastructure once we have good traffic.

Without to explain how you are giving no assurances about your credibility as a legit mixer, and without the need to need to mention all the scam btc tumblers used the same words to present themselves.
Hello,
As a legit mixer we have Letter of Guarantee with a reputable api integration.
Lots of subs and sites to post the review and awareness if Blender v2.0 does not meet safety standards.
A test drive with Blender v2.0 with no mixing fee.



I want to ask you op (as official representer) of blender, did you notice that you are using the name "blender" which is already used by another well known mixer called blender.io? This is his official ANN thread here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5052876
Indeed, i can't believe that it's a coincidence. Can you explain this strange similarity?

Yes i noticed the name blender, since we came to know that there was another bitcoin mixer with the same brand name, which is why we have v2.0 prefix with our mixer, also strangely the site allowed me to choose the same user name, if it was already taken by someone else, i would not have got the username from bitcoin.org if this was the case!? moreover we do not use any of the code, html, or logo from the blender.io.
Blender v2.0 is based on a completely different algorithm from blender.io and its visible on Blender v2.0 mirror.
but nonetheless, we are not affiliated with the former brand and do not intend to impersonate it in any manner, we simply would have named it blender without a v2.0 prefix, same page/algorithm/weblinks etc etc, if stealing coins or business would have been the agenda.