I suggest that large amounts of coins must be mixed slowly, ranging from 10 to 100 BTC every day. Hackers are unprofessional about Bitcoin mixing, and the details are not done well. Hackers think that mixing through chipmixer.com will be anonymous, and the blockchain is public. The data exists forever and anyone can access it at any time. "Total anonymity" is a university question. You can’t make mistakes. Chipmixer.com can only cut off the tracking of input and output, and adds a lot of anonymous features. Chips, each chip has tens of thousands of times the address for you to hide, merge, split, spend at any time, or temporarily spend, and there are many more) This is great. If you use it correctly, the security agency cannot track the source. If you want to be "completely anonymous", follow-up work depends on you. The hacker’s mistakes are merged together. This is a fatal error. Even a lot of private key bitcoins are sent to the same address. This is a failure, so it is easy to trace. After all, few people mix more than one hundred in this time period. Bitcoin, it is easy to think of what hackers do. The correct approach is to send each private key to an address and must not be merged together. Only by doing the details can you successfully mix the currency.

I have some research on hybrid technology. Neither coinjoin mixing technology nor traditional mixer can resist chain analysis (many mixers belong to the second generation mixing technology). The only innovative currency mixer is chipmixer.com At the moment, I can't break its anonymity.

To continue this list, let's see how many addresses hold such amounts:
1000 mBTC: 88063 addresses
1024 mBTC: 338 addresses
2000 mBTC: 17472 addresses
2048 mBTC: 114 addresses
4000 mBTC: 4332 addresses
4096 mBTC: 145 addresses
8000 mBTC: 1318 addresses
8192 mBTC: 57 addresses
16000 mBTC: 317 addresses
16384 mBTC: 2 addresses
32000 mBTC: 112 addresses
32768 mBTC: 0 addresses
My guess is not many people would use the option to convert 8192 mBTC into 8000 mBTC, while it requires a large amount of Bitcoin to be held in those chips.

It is best to compare it with other mixing services.

If you mix with common mixer - you deposit 1 BTC at one address and receive sum of 1 BTC at two-three addresses around 24 hours later. Those transactions may be matched and solved like sudoku puzzle.

If you mix with Coin Join - you deposit 1 BTC and nine other people deposit 1 BTC. Then all of you receive 1 BTC with same transaction and your identity is "you are one of the ten" (which is why you do many rounds of mixing).

If you mix with us - you deposit 1 BTC and receive 1000 mBTC worth of chips created up to month before your deposit. You pick chip sizes to withdraw, you pick when to spend them and at what combination - which mean that every existing chip (both before and after your deposit) increases your privacy.

The rationale behind this is actually explained in the FAQ:



And in case you really, really want "round" BTC chips:


A fee of 2% is well within the range that is customary for mixing services.

I found that there are many bitcoin addresses for integers, such as 1btc, 0.5btc, 1M, 2m, 4m, 8m. Each integer bitcoin address has tens of thousands of addresses. If you hide yourself in tens of thousands of addresses. It is really impossible to trace the major breakthrough factors in the analysis of the combined confrontation chain,,,