 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
|
DIGARAN
Your messages don't bother me.
|
|
|
|
|
Such as DIGARAN increases interest in hacking bitcoin. There is an illusion that anyone can solve the puzzle .
DIGARAN useful idiot, for the creator of the puzzle, because the interest in hacking began to fade.
|
|
|
|
|
james5000
How to run it in Ubuntu?
Write a command.
|
|
|
|
|
Digaran @
You can't offer anything useful. An endless stream of insanity.!
|
|
|
|
|
"If it is a Deterministic Wallet the creator must have done a huge code implementation just to create the transactions of this Puzzle"
Keys 1 to 160 are not one deterministic wallet. Perhaps (and indeed) the puzzle contains several deterministic wallets.
|
|
|
|
|
WanderingPhilospher
0x3b0812107ccf0168c:0x3b081212053d7cf17
0x3b0e4766c8585fd90:0x3b0e476850c6db61b
0x3b0fdd3a714e99cec:0x3b0fdd3bf9bd15577
0x3b01f9676c1298284:0x3b01f968f48113b0f
0x2f64750bb309d2b80:0x2f64750d3b784e40b
0x2f76405b2bc314700:0x2f76405cb4318ff8b
I tried
|
|
|
|
|
digaran
I want to help you if you tell me what to do. Do you have telegram? Where can you chat?
|
|
|
|
|
"I've been looking in this mirror for three years in a row!!))) I can reveal a secret - there are all the patterns - which are in any cyclic set - in which the number of members is a prime number! ))) there are patterns!!! That's just not possible to find the difference between the first half and the mirror second))) and so yes - it's very interesting to frustrate))"
Buddy, Doctor 1975. Show your guesses with an example!
|
|
|
|
|
The author of puzzle 32 has not logged into "bitcointalk" since 2019. And why, suddenly it's a "puzzle"?
Rebus))). Guys! A problem that has no solution is a fiction.!
|
|
|
|
|
"Imagine for puzzle 66, for a single computer that i have, I need about 2,500 years to be able to get one of his lowest easiest puzzles which are 6.6BTC"
Well, yes, the author of Puzzle suggests searching for the key 2 ^ 158. No pub key! As I understand it, we must brute force. ))) Guys, well, you're not idiots! Why did you buy into this crap.?
|
|
|
|
|
1)876742496012344784179985348367087362
*57896044618658097711785492504343953926418782139537452191302581570759080747168=50759922668204382934134837660716306466228361205929188691171789049422319851611495761608191356750899783486890090816
2)5075992266820438293413483766071630646622836120592918869117178904942231985161149 5761608191356750899783486890090816:115792089237316195423570985008687907852837564279074904382605163141518161494336=438371248006172392089992674183543681
3)438371248006172392089992674183543681
pub key 04811cfaa321171426ac4fc20a3a43f8ab4e9579923fafab4630039d7bb4daa2637f7e8c86ecb69 05e449804b7a85731343618f5a92582e3a7713e038a980d1544
|
|
|
|
|
Your calculator is not counting correctly! Check x = f196d3200d66872e9573cab8117b3943f482fc2d4ac53be85b34ffad9e8d640c
y = 6bd66e5ca7201d9d22717b1b70719955ca94e864bcedaba2c28d3d0083b5c167
I multiply by scalar 7fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff5d576e7357a4501ddfe92f46681b20a0
And I cry x = 811cfaa321171426ac4fc20a3a43f8ab4e9579923fafab4630039d7bb4daa263
y = 8081737913496fa1bb67fb4857a8cecbc9e70a56da7d1c588ec1fc7467f2e6eb
This is the wrong result. Should be x = 811cfaa321171426ac4fc20a3a43f8ab4e9579923fafab4630039d7bb4daa263
y = 7f7e8c86ecb6905e449804b7a85731343618f5a92582e3a7713e038a980d1544
|
|
|
|
|
"Can you provide an example"
I join the request!
|
|
|
|
|
Friends! Why are you all doing hopeless brute-force? Does anyone know other algorithms? Maybe -lenstra_elliptic_curve_method, quadratic_sieve?
|
|
|
|
I mean which program generates the prefix 16jY7qLJ  In the range 64 hex. |
|
|
|
|
zahid888 What program generated the addresses?
16jY7qLJ7nCjNCw3vnHjsNZbswAWbjgJRE D451B2D7C5C1F338
16jY7qLJ3Dvbu1wTLpuTqpNpmeoyZu6edt D4532C684B1A0377...etc
|
|
|
|
|
