 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 »
|
Of course I tried so, but still does not work |
|
|
|
|
Links from the first post did not work. Does anyone have these files?
|
|
|
|
|
в очередной раз совершил обмен с ТС, всё точно и быстро
|
|
|
|
|
меняю не в первый раз - все отлично, но резервы лучше сначала уточнить
|
|
|
|
thank you Noise23!!Mandatory update hardfork incoming use version 2.4.0.0 super!!! Any details? |
|
|
|
|
minimum coin age for stake?
|
|
|
|
|
Спасибо ТС, все оперативно и точно
|
|
|
|
Diff is up again. I guess certain users think they can get an advantage by forcing it up on purpose. A user named Bitmaster1(cryptsy) or Chantha(google hangouts) is been reported to me as trying to game the Tek system in this way. Force diff up all month until he wants to stake his large wallets. He did this same thing with Hyperstake and many users could no longer stake in a reasonable amount of time, overall costing hyperstake many users in the long run.
HyperStake's difficulty is so large, that one single wallet does not have much impact on the total. Even such, HYP's rewards are not bound to difficulty, so even if he thought he was manipulating its difficulty (which he probably was not able to do) it would have worked against him anyways by making it harder for him to stake as well. HyperStake's has always been on an upward trend, and always will be. I don't think this has caused any loss of users from what I see on the richlist, most of our usual stakers are still there staking away  TEK on the other hand is extremely sensitive to difficulty fluctuations, and since its difficulty is fairly low, creating a wallet full of small outputs does not cost too much and could be gamed a bit easier. Since TEK's reward system is bound to difficulty, there is incentive to manipulate. The only way I can think of to combat this is to either collectively decide to use more outputs, or to have some type of protocol change that doesnt bind the reward to the diff. +100500 protocol must be changed like HYP, but in contrast to HYP should be unlimited stake |
|
|
|
|
спасибо, отлично работаете!
|
|
|
|
Please help me, balance in my wallet ≠ in blockexplorer. I tried
chek&repair, -salvagewallet, delete blockchain and download again, restored old wallet from 1,5 ears old backup, export -> new wallet -> import, but balance in my wallet ≠ in blockexplorer... What's wrong?
What is the number of the block in your client? Which explorer are you using? What is the balance difference? 1. 2441813 2. http://hbn.cryptocoinexplorer.com/rich3. in wallet less ~6000 hbn |
|
|
|
|
Please help me, balance in my wallet ≠ in blockexplorer. I tried
chek&repair, -salvagewallet, delete blockchain and download again, restored old wallet from 1,5 ears old backup, export -> new wallet -> import, but balance in my wallet ≠ in blockexplorer... What's wrong?
|
|
|
|
Strange... TEK has crashed 25% or so in the last couple of days, and looking at the depth charts, it's seriously weighted on the Buy side... I can't think of any particular reason it should have dropped to that extent... At the moment, with a market cap of over $300,000, I'm also curious as to why you can buy all the available coins on Cryptsy for less than 0.8 BTC!!!
If you own TEK, is this a good thing - I'm trying to see the positive side of it, thinking that not many people are wanting to sell their coins, which will only serve to push the price up... Won't it?
I am holding on to my coins real tight, as the difficulty not getting any lower stake it getting less and less and price is moving up and steady. We will see price fluctuation from time to time, people sell coins to pay bills or buy another coins. After all TEK is a great investment. 100% agree  this is really strange |
|
|
|
|
выводил BTC-E рубли на VISA, деньги пришли в течении 5 минут
|
|
|
|
Anyone want to help support a crowdfunded effort to build an updated client for BCX?
yes. i will give 50000 bcx |
|
|
|
|
