That's right, only the last player loses.

Maybe while there are not many players, I should increase the search time for a successor from 24 hours to several days?


The idea is to motivate a person to become the "King of the hill", because the price that will be transferred to him from the next player will be at least 30% of the first player's deposit.

Good evening! Let me give you an example. Let's say I paid 0.001 ETH to become the "King of the Hill". Now, the minimum amount for the next person will be 0.001 + 30% = 0.0013 ETH. But he can pay even more, if, for example, the current gas price makes the game at such a rate unprofitable. This entire amount will be transferred to the current King of the Hill (minus my commission of 5%). Thus, with each new "King of the Hill", the rate increases by at least 30%, which provides income to the players. If the player has not found a successor within 24 hours, he lost and the next player will be able to enter the game with a starting price of 0.001 ETH. 

👑 King Of The Hill - a game based on the principle of mutual lending.

I present to you a new Ethereum game with simple rules.

The bottom line is mutual lending.

The rules are as follows:
A player can become the "King of the Hill" if they pay a certain price in ETH tokens.

How is the price formed?
The price of becoming the "King of the Hill" starts at 0.001 ETH and is increased by 30% with every new ruler.
Thus, the new player must pay an amount equal to the deposit of the previous "King of the Hill" + 30%. But you can pay even more, thereby increasing the cost of entering the game for the next player and increasing your potential income.

Tokens paid will automatically go to the previous "King of the Hill", minus service fee of 5%.

Thus, the possible income is at least your deposit + 30%, but it can be even higher.

But be careful: if you don't find a successor in 24 hours, the price will be reset to the starting value (0.001 ETH), which can be interpreted as a player's loss.

Waiting for you