Hey everyone,

I quite like this question.

I would invest in stock market with online brokers. There is a good article about a current test of the best online brokers in 2020. I think this is still a very special topic which needs more attention. A lot of people still don't have a clue how to invest their money right. It may be crypto, it may be in real life or in bank investments.

If you want to just have a look at this article: https://www.fitformoney.de/online-broker-test/
It's a swiss website so the article is in german, but you can easily translate it with Google or DeepL for example.

There is no exact answer.
Scientists are trying to build physical models of space, just like a child who made a paper boat with a sail blows on it and understands how a large sailing ship generally moves. Scientists compare these models with what they see in space. Since light from distant objects has traveled to us for billions of years, this means that we can see the distant past of the cosmos and check if the “models” fit what we see.
All theories of the origin of the cosmos describe what we see in the past of the cosmos and in its present. For example, we see that the entire sky is evenly lit in the "radio channel". That is, radio waves are pouring on us from everywhere. The radio brightness of the sky is about the same in all directions. And the properties of this radiation are explained (besides many other phenomena) by the so-called theory of inflation. She tells us about the extremely rapid expansion of space in the first fraction of a second of its existence. And this expansion continues to this day! Galaxies scatter, and at large distances - with anomalously high acceleration.
We can say that it all started from emptiness: space appeared from a vacuum. For physicists only, emptiness is not exactly emptiness. Particles constantly appear and disappear in it, providing a zero sum of energy in each “piece” of vacuum. But under certain conditions that arise by chance, just such a process is possible - the birth of the cosmos. This is how the most successful scenario for the birth of space looks like. But it does not mean at all that this is exactly how it was. We still have so much to study to get closer to real understanding.

There is no exact answer.
Scientists are trying to build physical models of space, just like a child who made a paper boat with a sail blows on it and understands how a large sailing ship generally moves. Scientists compare these models with what they see in space. Since light from distant objects has traveled to us for billions of years, this means that we can see the distant past of the cosmos and check if the “models” fit what we see.
All theories of the origin of the cosmos describe what we see in the past of the cosmos and in its present. For example, we see that the entire sky is evenly lit in the "radio channel". That is, radio waves are pouring on us from everywhere. The radio brightness of the sky is about the same in all directions. And the properties of this radiation are explained (besides many other phenomena) by the so-called theory of inflation. She tells us about the extremely rapid expansion of space in the first fraction of a second of its existence. And this expansion continues to this day! Galaxies scatter, and at large distances - with anomalously high acceleration.
We can say that it all started from emptiness: space appeared from a vacuum. For physicists only, emptiness is not exactly emptiness. Particles constantly appear and disappear in it, providing a zero sum of energy in each “piece” of vacuum. But under certain conditions that arise by chance, just such a process is possible - the birth of the cosmos. This is how the most successful scenario for the birth of space looks like. But it does not mean at all that this is exactly how it was. We still have so much to study to get closer to real understanding.

According to scientific data, the effectiveness of influenza vaccination is 70-90%, which means that the vaccinated get sick 7-9 times less often than the unvaccinated. I would compare the vaccine to a seat belt in a car. If you are wearing a seat belt, this does not mean that you are not vulnerable. However, it is foolish to argue that it is safer this way. It is your personal decision to "buckle up" against year or not, but we strongly recommend you, because it is no secret to anyone that prevention is easier than cure.

In the fight against coronavirus, all means are used - not least modern technology. For example, robots help doctors in infectious diseases wards of hospitals in China. In South Korea, China, Taiwan, and Singapore, mobile apps that track the social contacts of those infected have been instrumental in successfully overcoming the peak of the epidemic.

But what will happen to our personal data, which these robots or applications for smartphones are collecting about us now? Is a balance possible between the effective use of modern technologies in the fight against the virus and at the same time maintaining our right to privacy?
Contact tracing has been used in epidemiology for a long time. In particular, this was also true during the outbreak of SARS in the early 2000s, also caused by the coronavirus. But before this was done "manually": doctors asked patients about their contacts, made lists and monitored the condition of each. Now this is done thanks to signals from mobile phones or from mobile operators, using data via Bluetooth or geolocation.

In any case, it is better to wear masks for everyone.
First of all, it is important to know how the new coronavirus infection spreads. It is now known that there are two main transmission routes. Firstly, these are drops that fly out of a person when he coughs, sneezes and, for example, speaks. They go down rather quickly and if they end up on the mucous membranes of another person, he can get sick. Secondly, it is contact with contaminated surfaces. If a sick person coughed into his palm, then touched the doorknob, and then you grabbed it and rubbed your nose, then this can also lead to infection.

Another possible route for the spread of the virus is through smaller droplets that remain in the air for a long time. However, there is currently no evidence that under normal conditions, when you do not perform complex manipulations in the intensive care unit, such particles can be in the air.

Masks can protect you if a person coughs at you at a distance of less than two meters. That is why they are necessary for medical professionals who often find themselves in this situation. But they will not protect from infection through contact with a contaminated surface - as well as from smaller drops (if an ordinary person can meet them at all).

According to scientific data, the effectiveness of influenza vaccination is 70-90%, which means that the vaccinated get sick 7-9 times less often than the unvaccinated. I would compare the vaccine to a seat belt in a car. If you are wearing a seat belt, this does not mean that you are not vulnerable. However, it is foolish to argue that it is safer this way. It is your personal decision to "buckle up" against year or not, but we strongly recommend you, because it is no secret to anyone that prevention is easier than cure.

Confronting war is not the last problem of peacekeeping, it is much more important to eradicate violence in society in any of its manifestations: social, religious, political, national, racial. In this regard, pacifism puts forward the concept of radical anti-militarism, which includes renunciation of military service and its replacement with alternative, general disarmament. Almost every war has its own outburst of the pacifist movement, because people realize the irreversibility of the consequences in the form of millions of deaths and a destroyed environment.

Yes, COVID-19 has done its job. We have become different. Good or bad is hard to say. On the one hand, after several months of forced self-isolation, we learned to enjoy the little things and everyday moments, but at the same time, the observance of social distance has already gone beyond the norms.

Here recently with a colleague decided to have a snack. Already out of habit, having flown into one of the catering establishments, we planned to quickly place an order to take away in order to hide from prying eyes in our small office. And then suddenly I realized that because of our eternal workload at work, because of the fear of becoming a carrier of coronavirus infection, we completely stopped seeing people. The decision was made right there: we are not in a hurry, and we remain in the cafe. To be honest, at first it was somehow unusual, and then we were overwhelmed with joy. Great joy from things that seemed banal before: for example, from the opportunity to discuss new projects with like-minded people over a cup of coffee or swallow a huge burger in a diner. Life goes on!

I agree that for girls the financial stability of their partner is important as well as i mens are also concerned about extra burden.
But a sense of humor and the ability to see funny things are also important for me. What could be more terrifying than the prospect of living to your golden wedding, laughing at jokes for 50 years that don't really seem funny to you? My partner should also respect other people's judgments and ways of thinking.