X11 isnt profitable at all right now so thats probly why we havent heard anything from genesis about it. I really wish they would just let us mine at our own pools with our hash. I would buy more and not even bitch about the payouts if they would do that, the first cloud company to make that happen will make alot of money.

C'est drôle guigui371 que tu prennes l'exemple d'une définition dans un dictionnaire car le hack spécifique pour ce genre de mot de passe s’appelle Dictionary Attack.

En gros tu prends une liste d'expressions existantes comme les définitions de tous les mots commençant par A et tu les essayes toutes une par une.

C'est donc un mauvais choix de mot de passe

I am not a dev, I know how to write semantically significant HTML, this is all. I am a team member, different. What I cannot bring with code, I bring it with communication, suggestion, writing, webhosting... Like Ludom does for NXT, by the way.
For the technical specifications, read the cryptonote whitepaper, our OP. There are post where we sum up our additions to the orignal Bytecoin code and so far, I believe fluffypony's Tenebrix/blockchain post is the best summary at hand (the post you are linking is a great one, we agree on that)
For the Panama part, I had several email exchanges with the said "joke" even on Sunday morning, when a DDoS happened and he was with his family. Of course, you don' have to believe me.
(your English is good, really, stop underestimating yourself, most French do underestimate their level in English)

Oh please... When trying to play the private investigator game, at least do it seriously.

mintcointeam is the dev of Mintcoin
The Alty created the third (and now official) mintcoin site, mintcoin.cc. There was a bounty attached to it, by the way. Alty subcontracted a person in Panama for the actual creation of the website. Alty has since left mintcoin entirely and since I was involved in Mintcoin quite a bit (task manager), I took over. The Alty gave me access to the domain name. I also hosted the site until very recently, now someone else (rockingaltcoins) is hosting it because there was some load issues I could not handle with my hosting plan.

As for Monero.cc, I bought it after a voting session (votebot-sanctioned) on IRC, in April. Shortly after monero was on Poloniex, we decided to move monero.cc out of my hosting plan, to avoid DDoS and the like. It worked wonder.

Since you are playing PI, you should Google my name and read my English crypto-related and non-crypto-related entries (and French ones, since you seem French, according to your nick). You would a get a better idea of my personality and would have probably conclude I am either very good at faking an identity for years of else I am just not a deceiver.

A PI should never limit himself to a couple of sources and a lot of extrapolations - and confirmation biases. Even in bitcointalk, you did not search much. Read this post, for instance, this would give you a better insight of my personnality
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=406112.msg6584975#msg6584975

So if after that, you still want to dump, please do so. More monero for the others.
Et comme tu m'a l'air français, demande à superesistant, perl ou djinou94 ce qu'ils pensent de moi.

Your missing the point. The purpose of the fork was not to make technical changes. It was:

1. To cleanly launch the coin without an 80% hidden premine and an insanely fast reward curve that will release 96% of the coins in 4 years. (By comparison bitcoin released 50% in 4 years, and people complain about early adopters.) After that, what?  

2. To create a coin with active, engaged, community based leadership as opposed to some secret cabal hidden away doing nobody-knows-what with 80% of the coins.

The developers of Monero (and Bitmonero before it) did not have any special premine or any special access ability mine a huge amount of coins. The difficulty adjustment algorithm on this coin does not allow for any ridiculous instamine after release either -- the difficulty adjusts every single block. In fact to this day, only about 5% of the coins have been mined, and it is FAR from the case that developers or very early adopters have been the only ones mining. In fact I doubt we account for 10% of it at this point.

That said, if you really prefer BCN, it is over here. No harm no foul.

In the strange, strange world we live in, the fork has 2.2 million H/s while the non-fork has 180k H/s.

Maybe there's more to it.

Either way, enjoy your profit.

Actually I control the domain name, David merely registered it. The site is hosted on my servers. David is part of the core Monero team, but he is not the only one. In the next few days we will try make things a little more transparent in terms of who the core team is and so on, it's all been a little bit rushed since it went up on Poloniex, and we're reacting and reeling.

He is one developer, there are a few at the moment.

No future hey? We get started with a fair launch, lots of interest and the other coins you mention start with insta-mine or pre-mine and yet it's Monero that is the pump and dump?

Dude, you're spreading FUD, that is all.

I hold both MRO and DRK and so have thought about this question somewhat carefully. DRK has the advantage of better awareness (particularly with its recent price increase), the familiarity and backend support of using a BTC-based client and associated services, and a large community of holders/miners. The developer, Evan Duffield, is quite visible and had made meaningful development progress. Some of the economic characteristics of the coin, including its relatively low inflation and the masternode system (which ties up coin) tend to encourage price increases. The principal concern for many regarding it is its unequal early distribution ("instamine") which you'll have to decide for yourself how much it bothers you. Another potential criticism is that Darksend is currently closed-source and unvetted, so we have no way of knowing if it will deliver on its promises. In fairness, Evan has stated it will go open source when complete, however.

MRO has the advantage of a truly novel and elegant implementation of anonymity. If a coin's value is determined purely by the anonymity if offers then CryptoNote beats CoinJoin (which underpins Darksend) hands-down. Even the originator of CoinJoin, gmaxwell, has stated as such. The CryptoNote developers, while anonymous, appear to be quite familiar with the academic cryptography literature and have used ring signatures in a clever manner to underpin their coin. Ring signatures are academically vetted and enjoy broad support within the cryptographic community (e.g. Adam Back, the cryptographer who invented hashcash for Bitcoin, tweeted his support). While I think Evan is a great developer amongst the sea of altcoins, he strikes me as more of a coder and less of a cryptographer. He, for example, has reversed himself and decided against using ring signatures. While this decision was ascribed to avoiding bloat in the blockchain, I think it's more likely because he realized implementing ring signatures in a BTC-based coin, particularly one with an already-established blockchain, would be extremely difficult.

The main limiting factor of MRO right now is that because it is not based on BTC, all of the underpinnings users have come to expect (GUI, pools, exchanges, etc.) have to be developed from scratch. This hurts the uptake of the coin and scares off less advanced users. It is possible that DRK could develop a lead in user uptake while these things get sorted out. With that said, I think the progress over one month has been very fast given that deficit; there is also a strong team of experienced developers. Some also criticize MRO as a "clone" of Bytecoin (the original CryptoNote currency marred by its own, bigger, "premine" controversy). While Bytecoin did indeed form the base of MRO, the MRO devs have done a lot to popularize CryptoNote and make it accessible to end users. MRO also has by far the largest net hash and exchange volume of the CryptoNote coins. As we saw with Tenebrix/Litecoin, sometimes being second with a fair launch is what makes the difference in making a coin stick in the long term. Also, the reason DRK is able to avoid having any "clones" currently is because of its aforementioned closed source; this is not really a strength per se as it is unlikely that people will tolerate a closed source coin in the long run, particularly when it comes to anonymity.

Anyway, I think both of these coins have a bright future. While the recent run-up of DRK clearly has elements of irrational exuberance, I do think that, so long as it delivers on its promises, it deserves to be beside Litecoin as one of the most valuable BTC derivatives. For a dark-horse long-term bet though I think MRO is the true second generation cryptocurrency.

I used latest one from first page of this thread. Tried twice, each time stuck on block 10601.

FYI I use a wireless 3G key (with a limited monthly total volume but with a bandwidth faster than 500 kB/s). All ports are opened.

Can I find a peers database somewhere ? Is there a link of the full blockchain (blockchain.bin) ?


2014-May-23 16:53:39.926581 [P2P1][24.135.69.82:18080 OUT]Sync data returned unknown top block: 10601->53028[42427 blocks(29 days) behind]
remote top: <2bbf6ddb9e8371e1d34784ea536aa4a3339152a0ee1b0acc61605ca4221fdf60>[53028], set SYNCHRONIZATION mode
2014-May-23 16:53:39.936581 [P2P1][24.135.69.82:18080 OUT] COMMAND_HANDSHAKE INVOKED OK
2014-May-23 16:53:43.941587 [P2P3]Connecting to 114.226.120.151:18080(white=0, last_seen: d0.h0.m20.s48)...
2014-May-23 16:53:46.266590 [P2P3]Connect failed to 114.226.120.151:18080
2014-May-23 16:53:46.281590 [P2P3]Connecting to 70.54.161.133:18080(white=1, last_seen: d0.h0.m2.s30)...
2014-May-23 16:53:47.486592 [P2P0][70.54.161.133:18080 OUT]Sync data returned unknown top block: 10601->53028[42427 blocks(29 days) behind]
remote top: <2bbf6ddb9e8371e1d34784ea536aa4a3339152a0ee1b0acc61605ca4221fdf60>[53028], set SYNCHRONIZATION mode
2014-May-23 16:53:47.516592 [P2P0][70.54.161.133:18080 OUT] COMMAND_HANDSHAKE INVOKED OK
2014-May-23 16:53:47.526592 [P2P3]Connecting to 217.126.56.184:18080(white=1, last_seen: d0.h0.m37.s32)...
2014-May-23 16:53:49.166594 [P2P3]Connect failed to 217.126.56.184:18080
2014-May-23 16:53:49.176594 [P2P3]Connecting to 184.69.138.82:18080(white=1, last_seen: d0.h0.m5.s42)...
2014-May-23 16:53:50.276596 [P2P4][184.69.138.82:18080 OUT]Sync data returned unknown top block: 10601->53028[42427 blocks(29 days) behind]
remote top: <2bbf6ddb9e8371e1d34784ea536aa4a3339152a0ee1b0acc61605ca4221fdf60>[53028], set SYNCHRONIZATION mode
2014-May-23 16:53:50.321596 [P2P4][184.69.138.82:18080 OUT] COMMAND_HANDSHAKE INVOKED OK


... and so on ....

Works perfectly for everyone else, heres not a single complain except yours?
Did you use the newest one? Did you restart it etc?

For Pool specific problems ask the poolops please

This one seems actually quite interesting.

Halving could result a lost of nethash. As WC has halved one hour later Nethash also halved.

Doge nethash won´t half, but where to go with you scrypt rig ?