Panda Node 0.7.11-beta is out

- even faster synch
- less hassle to re-synch
- further fixes

https://pandascan.io - explorer2 is ready to be tested 

It is certainly interesting and perhaps the key length is important, but I wonder where the developers disappeared?
For more than a month, none of the team here appears.
No news or updates from them here.
Githab also did not update a couple of months amd this is very strange if not to say more.
Twitter and other social still no update from December. Looks like this is abandoned project.

Interesting project, I will wait for the result of the development. Fingers cross. BTW is there a discord channel for Bamboo?

-- Switching difficulty calc from once every 100 blocks to every 10,000 blocks (weekly)

error while loading shared libraries: libboost_system.so.1.65.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

That would be nice.
Any listing will add popularity.
There is also such an exchange as  exbitron.com
Listing there- would be great!

You should just be able to download and unzip the binaries and run them.

./miner: error while loading shared libraries: libleveldb.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Binaries:
https://github.com/mr-pandabear/panda-coin/releases/tag/v0.2-miner-alpha

Source:
https://github.com/mr-pandabear/panda-coin

/panda-coin/src/tools/benchmark.cpp:42:54: error: call of overloaded ‘concatHashes(SHA256Hash&, SHA256Hash&)’ is ambiguous
   42 |     SHA256Hash fullHash  = concatHashes(target, nonce);

Oh got it. You are building from source? In this case you need to make a folder
panda-coin/keys

I see. I wasn't able to replicate this. Are you running Linux or Mac? What is the path you are running the Miner from?

You shouldn't move the key.json file from where the keygen app creates it -- you can make a copy though. You get this error when you delete or move the keys.json file.

[STATUS] 11-28-2021 23:52:56: Adding host: http://ec2-54-189-82-240.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com:3000
[STATUS] 11-28-2021 23:52:56: Adding host: http://ec2-44-227-179-62.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com:3000
[STATUS] 11-28-2021 23:52:56: Adding host: http://ec2-35-83-163-26.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com:3000
[STATUS] 11-28-2021 23:52:56: Adding host: http://ec2-35-84-249-159.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com:3000
[STATUS] 11-28-2021 23:52:56: Running miner
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'nlohmann::detail::parse_error'
  what():  [json.exception.parse_error.101] parse error at line 1, column 1: syntax error while parsing value - unexpected end of input; expected '[', '{', or a literal

There are no perfect networks and no perfect blockchains all of them are vulnerable in one way or another the question is only in the resources and the desire to use it, in neuralium there is no capitalization yet, so there are no attempts to capture the network, well, or not yet, the team is constantly working to improve the code and the stability of the network. Just look at the number of Neuralium Wallet releases they have released, they are quite open to a constructive dialogue with everyone who is interested, I do not understand your negative attitude to this project. And why do you think that during a violation in the network or when blocks get stuck, someone gets x200 reward, if the chain does not move, then no one gets a reward for this time, I do not understand what kind of network capture you are talking about, to discuss this, you need to give specific facts, but in the explorer at the moment you can not see the balances of the wallets of participants, and if so, it is pointless to talk about it

i created the account, and asked for that "appointment", seriously? what is that?
crypto always did for stay anonymous, put an anti-robot solver, not this shitty appointment? seriously?

Finally, we can congratulate the development team on the successful launch of mainnet Neuralium, v. 1. 0. 1. 7 works perfectly, 3rd tier mining is up and running stably for me

ok, sorry then. I misunderstood your tone, my bad. Block 10 was just released, see if your account is confirmed in it once it is synced. If not, then it could be a bug, our software is getting better but is not perfect yet. reapply to the next appointment tomorrow, im sure you will get through, it is getting pretty solid now.

Block 10 was just released minutes ago with 387 confirmed account transactions in it.

https://explorer.neuralium.com/Block/Details/10?backto=Index

the appointment system delegates the validation process to 1st tier miners. So not only are 1st tier miners the backbone of the p2p and distribution of the blockchain, but they also serve as opportunistic validators for the appointments.  The number of validators will always be the number of 1st tier miners.  we run surrogate validators to patch up the holes until the p2p becomes strong enough to become completely self sufficient.

@Mandolorian  you seem well intent on passively trolling. is it a fun hobby?    There is no way for us to take revenge on anybody, it is all anonymous and bound by cryptography. I can see the transaction pool, but so can everybody else, since every miner maintains it's own trx pool and it is all public. If we look at transactions, we only see meaningless numbers, there is no way to identify it and link it to anyone.

plus when mining will start, transactions are selected by the miners. actually we are the only crypto among the most prominent ones to do this. THIS is true power in the hands of the people.

Congratulations Daltonik!, you are all setup and ready to mine, yoohoo!!

Yes, mining will start on January 22nd (unless we hit some big iceberg or something like that), so now all you have to do is wait. on that day, mining will start and you are all ready to go.

On the team's side, our appointments were a success in all 3 world regions yesterday, finally marking the point where we are ready to go live. The technology is complex, but we are almost out of the woods now, and the party is soon to start.

see you there everyone!

haha, we are strange, that is for sure! I take it as a compliment, we truly think differently  

about telegram, our moderator (Katherine) has to handle many hundreds of messages daily of all types, so she does not have any time to waste on trolls. She took the aggressive stance of deleting trolling postings. Sometimes she could make an error and delete legit messages by mistake, but we can't blame her in the barrage of posts she has to sort through. (especially that she runs most post in an automatic translator and a lot of the original meaning can be lost.)

There is a big difference between constructive criticism or valuable comments, and emotional rage postings and trolling rants. We see a waaay too many of the later and we delete those on the spot. Intelligent comments and opinions are always kept, reflected on and addressed.

it is funny how some people's idea of constructive criticism we should consider is "this is rubbish, i hate it, grrrr grrrr grrrr, look at me I'm mad!".  

then they go on bitcoin talk as 1 post newbies and make sure to post there to take their revenge, hehe.


we will always be friendly and courteous to good people. Act respectable, and we will respect you. Super simple.