 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
Does it add significant bloat to the blockchain? I am interested too. How hard would it hit the chain? |
|
|
|
Agree XC has very strong fundamentals, and considering it's only 5 weeks old it's chart looks very similar to early days drk.. Unlike drk though it has a tier 1 dev. XC will be explosive this week. I had a few (very few) XCs some time ago.. managed to sell them at 0.0042(29 May).. and guess what.. it is about 3.5 times cheaper now.. Do you suggest I should have stayed on the ship while going underwater? |
|
|
|
If there is no proper place to post it, it's either offtopic or spam. Do you really believe that? That is utter bs.. So depending on the language one (and the same) thing may be either offtopic/spam or not? Would you really confirm that? Noone blaims you that you hate bulgarians.. as far as I see it you are trying to justify something unjust with illogical statements. |
|
|
|
Thanks  I thought it is from within MintPal.. |
|
|
|
310 BTC in buywalls above 150 on Mintpal.
How do you see the depth with bigger horizon? All I can see is from 0.0156 up.. |
|
|
|
I couldn't make it work on full speed (installed the recommended driver), but.. I got a BIN created from its kernel and got the same speed increase using an old optimised sph miner.. So guys.. if in doubt.. just search around for BIN files only. |
|
|
|
let me put it this way, if there were only 2 pools to get all the coins from, and those pools mined all the blocks, and took a 1% fee from each block, then would those two pools not each own 1 percent of the total coin? once all coins in POW were mined?.
They would own 1%, but only from those blocks found by them.. the cumulative earning from both Pools would still be 1% of all.. this is the beauty of the percents. |
|
|
|
i promised to stay out of it, so this will be my last hurrah - how can you consider something where the mining portion is controlled entirely by one entity to be decentralized... it literally is the polar opposite...
MIN coin is not centralised! Don't you see the irony.. a guy knowing not the difference between past and present tense is trying to teach the rest..  Oh the irony.. |
|
|
|
it was made clear from the beginning, for example, that this coin will not be on bittrex during the pow stage... so they were excluded...
if i ran bittrex, right about now i would be giving a very "cold shoulder" response to this coin in public (which is kind of what they're doing), while in private i would be thinking - go screw yourself... Do you know who did make it clear? If not.. read about first.. and then continue to talk (as it is bullshit atm). |
|
|
|
|
I like the last one.. white on dark background. (and the black on white after that..)
|
|
|
|
Hold for 5% POS and come back in a month. I thought it is 5% per year.. |
|
|
|
Minerals dev: why the jump in difficulty? assuming we are seeing this right?
The overall net hash was about 10GH/s and it is nearly 20 now.. |
|
|
|
It would be nice if part of those bounty DRKs could be entitled to people like him.. would also help on the PR scene.. building the image of the coin as one, which pays its dues to its ancestors.. |
|
|
|
I am sure you don't quite understand the concept behind this multipool.minerals.pro as well
As I just said "multipool" is incorrect word and confuses people
Its not regular multipool as we used to know, it mines other coins, trades it on exchanges for minerals and pays you minerals for mining.
Well.. I thought that is what a multipool is.. so I see nothing in your description that differs from my understanding of a multipool. It trashes other coins to sustain its own coin.. still the same whether it is paying in BTC or MIN.. the idea is the same. (Not that I have so much against multipools as a miner.. it just sounds wrong when coupled with the coin's idea.. I don't even try to judge the developer for his attempts to support the coin and hear what people want.. this is what he is expected to do.) |
|
|
|
Your saying, min.multipool will mine other coins to purchase MIN and payout will be in MIN. (in the name of protecting the coins value by purchasing large amounts of MIN) Is this not exactly what blackcoinpool.com has been doing with blackcoin after it went POS? look at their stats now... very low miner count, blackcoin is in the toilet in price again.... that concept is basically failing for the most part. Plus the pool operators there, I think got a little greedy with how they used others hash power to mine and then buy and distribute blackcoin as payment. Any miner with any sense saw it was a bit of a rip-off. For me I still say stay out of the multipool business in everyway shape and form for MIN. Let it be NON-MULTIPOOL if its going to be used as BCPOOL has done. it is failing. Why not just let the average miners and investors set there own course and nature will do its thing with this coin. NO-MULTIPOOL Thanks for pointing out joe  Agree with MinermanNC.. If the idea of the coin is against multypools, whales and so on.. isn't it double dealing to start one yourself? (I see the reasoning behind its short term advantages, but still.. isn't it more important to stick to initial values?) I.e. I would vote against it.. I keep my MINs (mined a bit lately and stopped) and would benefit from it, but would prefer to miss that opportunity than play unfair.. |
|
|
|
Ok, we can have a vote on this. We can shutdown the multipool now and wait until the end of POW. The reason we were pushing for it now is because some people were saying that it is not profitable to mine.
Those guys should forget about fast earning.. this is pump and dump behaviour.. |
|
|
|
You do realize you just called yourself stupid, right?
Do you realise you did not read the whole post? It may be important to answer fast (why would it be important in this case is anyone's guess..), but.. don't let it be on the expense of not reading everything written. |
|
|
|
|
@coins101 - I am not sure what you mean with this SPAM.. Diversification is very important.. one has to be very stupid or seer to put everything on one coin. Or of course (as in my case) play with low enough volume so that it is not important (if you think I am trying to FUD Dark.. you are wrong.. I have no other e-coins but DRK).
|
|
|
|
Hi everyone! Sorry about not quickly responding to your suggestions for promote Minerals.
Let's do it together!
Some of yours wrote to me in PM and here
There are many areas in promoting minerals.
Let's cooperate and coordinate in each direction.
Now, I see the following global directions:
1. Social Activity
1.1 Starcraft fans and professionals in North America
1.2 Starcraft fans and professionals in Europe
1.3 Starcraft fans and professionals in Korea
1.4 Starcraft fans and professionals in other countries
1.5 Facebook
1.6 Twitter
1.7 Blogs
2. Financial Instruments
2.1 Large Exchanges
This list of tasks is proposed as an example, maybe you can see other directions, which are available to you.
As you know, we have No premine. We mainly stick to social position. The only thing that we have - is 1% pool fee. We are willing to pay a bounty of these funds.
I am a little bit surprised you did not put Koreans on the first place.. I would target them first when talking about SC.. |
|
|
|
It would be smart to pick up some Monero like I suggested yesterday and yes I own lots of DC too. Don't put all your eggs in one basket. You never know as we will continue to see with Monero, it is a solid coin and has to potential to compete with DC.
This has nothing to do with your previous message. And Yes.. I fully agree with you. |
|
|
|
|
