CFX became extremely profitable in last few days due to high commissions with eSpace. Mine it with us right now at https://cfx.nanopool.org/
|
|
|
|
|
ZEPH is 4 times more profitable than XMR right now! It is mined with the same miner. Time to switch your rigs =) XMR -> ZEPH = x3 profit
|
|
|
|
Now we support Ironfish and Zephy mining too! With EXTRA reward paid each block!!! Get 5% more coins ZephyProtocol mining pool address: http://zeph.nanopool.org PROMOTION at the start of the pool! The reward for each block of the first 1000 found has been increased by 1 ZEPH (8.4% bonus to the block value) Confirmation: 100 blocks Reward distribution: 240Min PPLNS Commission: 1% Minimum payout amount: 0.1 ZEPH Supported connections: Stratum Support for SSL connections Possibility to mine on an exchange wallet IronFish mining pool address: http://iron.nanopool.orgPROMOTION at the start of the pool! The reward for each block of the first 6000 found has been increased by 1 IRON (5% bonus to the block value) Confirmation: 10 blocks Reward distribution: 360Min PPLNS Commission: 1% Minimum payout: 0.05 IRON Supported connections: Stratum Support for SSL connections Possibility to mine on an exchange wallet |
|
|
|
Hi, everyone! Official topic moved to another thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5401460.0Please, post there. We've added several new coins this year! Now you can mine IronFish and Zephyr with extra profit, paid by the pool (each mined block reward increased by 1 coin) |
|
|
|
Looks like "some minor changes" are not minor at all. |
|
|
|
|
We've returned to the previous wallet version too, to prevent accident forking of Nanopool.
BTW: If there is such a big change in the wallet, making it at least theoretically incompatible with the previous blockchain version, shouldn't it have been done somehow else?
Like setting the block number the changes applied and making announcement like "you MUST update your wallet before X day", "mandatory update" and so on?
As it looks more like kind of a "fork" to me.
|
|
|
|
Except that the actual hashrate on the two pools differed using the same mining software and same hardware.
That's a problem thats been reported by more than one person in this thread.
Everyone's hashrate was higher on Suprnova. No one reported a higher hashrate on Nanopool.
All our test rigs show the correct 6hr average hashrate with sgminer. Probably those people were using the old miner. |
|
|
|
basyaru please run latest daemon ASAP. If not, we will ask miners to abandon your pool.
Nanopool should be considered hostile at this point. (1. stealing hashrates, 2. DDoSing Suprnova and then 3. the time-attacks) I think it makes sense for every miner to abandon them. 1) We made the same code change, the latest release has, 3 hours ago already. Developer has written in email what did he do in the code. 2) Our servers properly synchronised and our block time is correct. 3) We don't make any DDOS attacks, but we DO have a DDOS protection. 4) "stealing hashrates" is an absurd thing, as you can not have the same effective hashrate on the pool side, as your miner shows. You lose some time to achieve work and to send it, have some % of invalid shares, miners pause mining on job changing (good ones do it quick, but still has a break). The better miner works, the better connection is the closer your pool stats to the miner reports. 5) The REAL attack was shifting all the pool blocks timestamps to 30 seconds in the future, making it impossible for our pool to mine any blocks in next 30 second after Suprnova finds a block until we've applied the fix. |
|
|
|
According to suprnova they already deployed the new deamon and such..why you wait then?
Don't get it.
We've fixed the code on the server side ourselves. First trial had a bug making some blocks with the same timestamps, but we've fixed it already. We will NEVER use pre-compiled binaries on the server side. We always compile the sources we've checked and downloaded from the official github/site. |
|
|
|
the nano shit pool keep attacking,time not update,all miners leave the shit pool
We are not attacking. We are still waiting the source code of the fixed Pascal coin from the dev. And we are trying to fix it manually. |
|
|
|
|
Nanopool added sgminer-pascal mining support.
|
|
|
|
|
Added PASC pool. Minimum payout 5 PASC.
|
|
|
|
Now you can mine Monero with us at https://xmr.nanopool.orgReward system: 180Min PPLNS Commission: 0% on the start Regular payouts Min XMR to payout: 1 XMR Supported clients: Claymore, tsiv, Wolf Support SSL connections Supported mining directly to exchange wallet Efficient, optimized backend Detailed per worker statistics Rigs monitoring by email notifications Usefull API Welcome to our pool  |
|
|
|
Hello, We had several more non-confirmed ZEC-transactions, so we've initiated a new investigation on the issue and had to stop the payments for a while. The results are: 1) Our previous assumption of fork-transaction was incorrect. Balance of that transaction was restored to accounts. 2) Transactions were silently refused by the network, but the wallet was still waiting for it. That happened after increasing the maximum number of tx outs to 1500 in the desire to reduce transactions count and the wallet size growing, as was suggested by the developers here: https://github.com/zcash/zcash/issues/17493) We had to reindex the wallet to restore proper balance, but it broke again after restarting the wallet... so we've moved to the new wallet again and split mining wallets from paying ones. 4) All the rejected transactions were unrolled.(Transactions removed, balances restored). 5) Payment system was updated and payments were executed. We are really sorry for not having time to answer all the mails and messages at forums, as we were trying to clear the situation and fix the payments as soon as possible. We've increased the mininmum payout limit to 0.005 ZEC to decrease the number of transactions. |
|
|
|
|
It is not that bad. It is just overpriced. Or manipulated.
People will mine anything if they are getting money.
Nanopool added Genoil miner support and updated Help and binaries.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
