I would say we are around the early adopters stage.

So glad I backup everything with CrashPlan and it keeps multiple revisions of a file.  Somehow lost the wallet.dat file that contained my ShareCoin address I registered with.  Glad I was able to restore an older copy of it!

Sounds interesting.  I will give it a try.

@Coinshift  - Really like the idea of the pool, and have been happy with my results mining the last 2 weeks.  Like the VarDiff and the lower payouts.

Was wondering tho if it would be possible to add a simple chart bellow the graph with similar information in plain text.  
Just something like:

Worker |

Avg MH/s |

MH/s current |

Reject Avg |

Current Reject

Make the average over the last 12 or 24hrs, something like that.

Reason I'm asking is the graph is great, and the total MH/s is great, but my workers hash speed is very spread out, and its had to tell what my slower works are doing with just the graph.  If my total MH drops, it would be nice to see which worker is being slow and see if I need to do something with it or that computer. 
And I like the fact the graph is an image, loads great on smart phones so please don't change that into one of those interactive ones.

@WP - thanks for all your hard work and running such a great mining pool.

I was wondering tho, if VarDiff had been considered or discussed in the past.  The 512 difficulty seems a bit steep.  Looking at the earning log, the coin has been switched approximately 50 times in the last 5hrs, only giving an average of 6 minutes per coin.  My poor slow mining rigs cannot finish their work before the coin switch, especially on really fast coins that only take 30 secs or so.  Even my faster mining rig (800kh/s) shows a lot of stales.  When mining on a VarDiff pool my fast rig normally gets set about 256, while my 2 slow(100khs/ and 200khs/s) rigs are more around 64 or 96.
Or is VarDiff just to much load on the servers?  Would it be better to offer a lower difficultly option or two? (128,256,512 ?)

Thanks!