so i see the site is still not provably fair..

"Whipple Flip win up to 498.75x" do you even have to funds to pay out 498.75x ??

same here, seems like theyre having some problems..

you mention "A new seed will be generated for your next roll" but you show us the hash of only the LAST seed, not the future one. Is this just a UI bug? If you do not show us the next seed hash, then this is not provably fair at all.

nevertheless, nice site - when is it gonna be functional?

yet you dont care that your site is not provably fair. interesting.


pd uses the same key for the day, they cant manipulate single bets.
pd has been around for a while, pd is reputable. this is some new site with an unknown owner with a negative trust. are you really that naive?

as for the 100 combinations in a couple of m sec - not a problem. it is only a question of calculating a hash. if your hash rate is 10million hashes per second, do you really thing bruteforcing 100 combinations is a problem?

im glad im not the only one that is disturbed by this.

OP, if you are serious about this website, you should consider switching to a nonce-based system asap.

Again, your provably fair system is not provably fair. when a bet is made, we supply the client seed, you take your server seed and add the time to it. we do not know what exact time is supposed to be added to it.

everyone should consider the following possiblity:
- player makes a bet
-server receives bet with client seed
- the bet took place at approx 22:30:00
- server tries all 100 combinations of the number that is added after the seconds (ex: 22:30:00:15)
- for each of these 100 numbers, server calculates the lucky number (ofcourse with our custom client seed)
- server finds a number for which the player loses
- that number is published as the time

I am not saying that this is what OP is doing, BUT THIS IS NOT PROVABLY FAIR!!

how about using a nonce instead of time, so that we can be sure about the string from which the roll is calculated. The way it is now is that time appears to be picked arbitrarily. I am not saying you are cheating us, but this does create a space for cheating from the side of the site owner. That goes entirely against the provably fair concept.

the site is cool, but the verification is fishy. the time on the roll is different from the time when i bet. could be due to lag, but it seems that the owner could be scamming us by selecting specific timestamps. I do not believe this provably fair system. no one else uses a timestamp. very suspicious.

cant even withdraw from this 55btc site... SCAM!!

Site is solid, fast, nice design. had small delay of withdrawal, support was very quick and helpful. will play again.

I believe this site is a SCAM. The verification does not work on some rolls, especially the larger ones!

Try this: deposit 0.005 or 0.01 btc, bet all on 50%chance - you will always lose (!!!!). Half of the time, verification will not work. Why is this? because they changed the bet so you will lose. How convenient for them that the original user hash is not available for the user after the round is played. They will just say that he copied the hash wrong.

Verification has to ALWAYS work in order for the site to be provably fair. For me, it happened several times that the verification did not work, especially with larger bets (when they lost, what a coincidence). I encourage everyone to try this for themselves (beware, you will lose the money).

Of course I cannot list them here because they are not public, neither are the original hashes so people could verify my claims...

SCAM

the provably fair checking doesnt return correct values either... very fishy