Perfect.  Changing to WORKSIZE did fix the problem - but the GPUs were going sick/dead very quickly.  I ended up having to run with i12 -- i13 or above and the gpus get unhappy.


Oh, okay.  I set tc4096 while doing the above -

hmm - i replaced my neoscrypt.cl with yours then deleted my bin file.  when sgminer goes to recreate it:

any idea what i've done wrong?  not sure if 'workgroupsize' has anything to do with 'worksize' but ive tried it at 128, 256, and undefined.

a shortcut on my startmenu points to c:\program files (x86)\multibit-0.5.18\multibit.exe

either the shortcut or the multibit.exe binary launches it.

no multibit*.jar exists on the machine -

I have lots of %appdata%\local\temp\tempNN.jar - when I load Temp14.jar, Multibit opens.  But extracting it doesn't show the folders/files i'm looking for (folders include ch/com/i18n/images/javax/lib/...)

The only other .jar file related to multibit is c:\program files (x86)\Multibit-0.5.18\uninstaller\uninstaller.jar

no more wild goose chase for now.

Anyone know how to do this on Windows7 ?  I'd like to reduce the min fee to 0 and - just in case - reduce the max fee to .01. 

Using Multibit 0.5.18, there is no multibit-exe.jar in c:\program files (x86)\multibit-0.5.18\ nor %appdata%\multibit

alternatively, any tips on how to build from source for windows7 would also be great.  the clues in readme.md aren't enough for me.

#21    DCYUdQGFrXjubHsWchXpLtMkTiZhgKwcQs    132297.2 DOGE    145526.92 DOGE    b58354d534d7f3...    pending

#24    DCYUdQGFrXjubHsWchXpLtMkTiZhgKwcQs    200000 DOGE    220000 DOGE    78684823e596b9...    confirmed

I think there's still a ton of interest in LTC ponzi.  But everyone is waiting to see what you do next and how everyone responds.

• put ltc back to 120%
• put cap back to 30
• remove 200% at the end
• put clock back to 24 hours
• if less than 25 players within 8 hours

          * cancel game
          * pay confirmed players back via some insurance fund
          * restart game at next 24 hour mark

• leave game alone.  even if it takes a few days to get going again.

how about if the round doesnt get 30 players then you pay them out to 100% from the 5%/+30/too late pool.

and ditch the 200% at the end, unless it never comes out of the general pool.

it is.  the 200% coming from the general pool explains it all.  thanks!

if you opened the spreadsheet i sent twice you would see the 5% is accounted for.  everything is accounted for.

in case anyone is afraid to open the spreadsheet, here it is as an image:


row #15 (because row#1 is a description field) is actually row#14 on ltcponzi.

what it seems, though, is that the 200% final deposit is not being taken from the 5% pool but rather from the investor pool.  if this is correct, it explains why #14 was not paid.

you've mentioned several times that the the 5% fee and late deposits are needed "in case the last recorded transaction is 30 LTC" -- e.g., http://ltzponzi.com/faq says that the reason you keep late deposits are "for future cases when there may not be enough transactions to cover the 200% pay back" -- so I am under the impression the final 200% was not coming out of the investor pool.  am I wrong there ?

Right, we were DMing.  But I was looking for a detailed explanation on why #14 was not paid and all I got was "we don't pay more than what we have in the bank" and "did you include our 5% fee", neither of which held water due to my calculations and figures that I've been providing.

Due to the detailed figures I've provided, I think #14 should have been paid.  I am hoping to get detailed information/figures back that shows why it should not be paid.  I thought more people here would care and have chimed in, but i guess not.  Or maybe that's why the last two rounds have less than 10 players :-/. 

BTW: I only deleted a tweet that was OT to this.  Our DMs are still there.

Hey Blue Neck (and all):

I set up the spreadsheet for last round:
sendspace.com/file/9bl8i3

This shows that #14 should be paid.  But according to the /last_round webpage (mirrored at http://kister.net/tmp/ltcponzi.com/last_round) #14 was not paid.

I tried to take this up with @Ponzidoge1 on twitter, but didnt get very far.

Who's math is wrong here?  Shouldn't #14 have been paid ?