Yea that huge 28k sell wall looked crazy... way more downpressure coming & after Thursday's meeting probably double digits
still waiting for double digits? |
|
|
|
|
Please PM me your expected price and condition, prefer unopened.
|
|
|
|
bought 50 at 13.5, still holding and I guess will be for some time. if price goes to 12.5, will buy another 50, and so on for every 1$ slide down  Good to know I'll have somebody to sell to into oblivion. Yes I'm always here for you hon. Sell me your worthless $12 bitcoins. |
|
|
|
Any news on the 0.1 coin?  |
|
|
|
Update:
Thanks for keeping it up to date! We are pretty much at the daily "last 20 days are the best 20 days for bitcoin" stage now ) |
|
|
|
Actually it went like this: Whenever you find yourself posting hopeless trash on bitcointalk, it is time to pause and reflect. |
|
|
|
|
Just dropped by to see the crazy crowd. Yes, all here, nothing changed in years, only that the crazies started using new acronyms ) Guess time does not cure that.
Please continue.
|
|
|
|
|
If you need money in the next year or two - sure, take profit, you most certainly will have a chance to buy back lower than it is today.
Just don't sell all, as you never know how high it will go this run, and nobody does.
|
|
|
|
Enough is enough already! Let's get Roger Ver and GMaxwell into the octagon and just punch it out. Ver wins, it's 8MB; Max wins, it's SegWit. Winner take all. I say that fat fuck goes down in the first round.
The ability to fight is not a great metric for measuring decision making in a technological environment. Dog, you should know this as you said in 2011 that bitcoin would die....oh how you were so wrong. Bitcoin is dead you moron. Just because crazy Chinamen like paying insane amounts for it, doesn't mean it is alive. The network is fully fucking broken and a backlog and high fees is making loads of application builders to abandon their efforts to make blockchain based things. Core Blockstream only see two things: settlement network and lightning. Unfortunately there are a huge bunch of transactions that don't fit into those classes. Bitcoin isn't dead, it is fucking dead. Blockstream killed it. I just love reading those village idiots on here Too bad this forum has been overrun by signature spammers and these rare displays of pure idiocy are becoming harder to find. Oh well. |
|
|
|
I doubt that very much.
Based solely on TA we will see a small recovery and another big dump that would take us to 1500-1700.
Selling during this small recovery seems a smart move.
OOpsie. |
|
|
|
Ohhhh MATT!!!!
Where's that massive correction from $1600 you were on about !?!?!?!
Hello??? Matt??
*crickets*
Stop making fun of Mat, he enjoys it! Losing all his coins and all potential earnings and then keep coming back to see others grow their capitals x4 by doing nothing - must be of a very masochistic nature |
|
|
|
Only if he's dumb enough to cash out.
Blockchain analysis shows the coins were immediately sent through a mixer so the thief could have pretty easily cashed out by now. Are mixers really useful for large volumes? Have not checked them in quite a while, but when someone with >100btc trying to mix it becomes pretty obvious which output coins are his. So while it might not be a conclusive evidence, once he cashes out and it turns that he used to work at alitin at the time, dots connect and case opens. |
|
|
|
This is very sad to hear. More so for the owners of raided coins.
If there was a leak of private keys somewhere in the production process the manufacturer should know the name of the people involved.
So if an investigation is ongoing no much info can be publicly released. Over time hope some names surface, we know who did it in Coinographic's case.
Richard was apparently the only one with access to private keys, so he stole them himself, or he is flat out lying. One other possibility is that he thought he was the only one to ever see the private keys but someone else got a copy of (some of) them. They did have a lot of people on their failed "risk management" committee/team. But how is that possible? He claimed he created the private keys himself, then engraving coins and destroyed the private keys. It's a pretty simple process. Simple process with many steps. Created - how, on which device, who else had access to this device before or after the key was generated? Engraving - where, was the room checked for recording devices, did he ever leave that room for bio needs, who else could have been in the building at this time? Packaging the coin - same questions. There is a lot of trust you need to put in the process of private key creation to be sure it did not get recorded somewhere. As they got sweeped only now, when BTC price reached newsworthy levels, probably the thief/person who had the partial list of keys only remembered about that now. Would be pretty hard to find a trace of what could have happened 3 years ago... Only if he's dumb enough to cash out. PS on a related note, if anybody selling compromised joannas / adam smiths after you get your refund, please PM. |
|
|
|
I don't know how the devs team going to solve this problem as they still argue each other.
Yeah, you get this impression from reading this forum Fact is, there is almost no argument on scaling between bitcoin developers, path is quite clear. The path is however blocked by some businessmen who do not agree with it.They have neither expertise nor a clear understanding, they just have profit in mind and the proposed solution would kill their future profit. So they invent one stumbling block after another - classic/xt/bu - just to not allow bitcoin to progress to infinite scalability. But bitcoin will shake them off, like all the other small obstacles like China and government regulation. Just takes time. |
|
|
|
I dont think bitcoin is under attack maybe the reasons why its because of heavy traffic or congestion. I also encountered this too long to be confirm in my wallet, blockchain problem that took 2days confirm in my wallet. I think its trhe volatility price of bitcoin that most encountered this problem.
The attack is the traffic, someone are doing a lot of microtx just for increase the traffic. I don't know who or why but it's real. For now, the best solution probably would be increase the blocksize.. Oh another expert in the field! Who already knows the best solution. One advice: if you don't know who or why and generally have no idea what is going on, do not come up with solutions, first understand what's going on. |
|
|
|
it did change my behaviour when I send bitcoins,mostly
I don't like to be asked to pay 0.001 bitcoin fee for a 0.07 btc transaction (almost 1.5%) and then wait for it to go through for additional 3-12 hours
and I pity those who rely on microtransactions,people who are using faucets,PTC or other ways to earn bitcoins online
they suffer huge setbacks because of the fees-their multiple dust payments take up a lot of space and therefore cost way too much for this
sort of moneymaking (if you can call it so) be worth the time spent
Why won't they send these spam transactions via one of hundreds of alts which have zero fees? Not like they need bitcoin's security for sending $1... Convert into some alt with shapeshift and use that. |
|
|
|
If Bitcoin price goes high enough, I bet ya someone will take advantage of new markets which involves instant transfer services for cheaper fees. It would be ironic for BTC.
So, you seem quite sure that people don't care about security of the network and instead always select the cheaper option. I can accept that bet, how much you want to wager? |
|
|
|
by minutes I mean minutes. all txs sent with 160 satoshis per byte went out in 1-2 blocks, which is anywhere from 0 to 30 minutes. try it at least once...
bitcoin is perfectly fine, what is not fine is the army of trolls pushing their masters political agenda. this we should definitely get rid of, its a nuisance to actual developers and actual community.
 Yes, and $1840 per megabyte, so what was your point exactly? If you just wanted to demonstrate your complete intellectual disability, there are simpler ways than crafting a meme. |
|
|
|
I want to embrace both SegWit *and* unlimited block size. Is that possible? How would I go about doing it?
Well segwit is a precursor to any block size increase. Once it is in place, and once utxo set pruning is in place, then maybe we could start considering some (much smarter than BU, with actual thought put into it) flexible block size suggestions. With the current state of the network, some devs are saying that block size *decrease* is needed now to ensure network security. So at this moment, it is outright irresponsible and dangerous for the network, that is why only people who have zero stake in bitcoin or people who invested heavily into ethereum advocate for it. They would be ok with bitcoin dead. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
