 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
Any plans on adding the YAAMP clones that are popping up?
Should be pretty easy since they expose the same API.
KBomba or StuffOfInterest: Will/Could anyone of you update MinerControl so that it could be used with the different yaamp clones? That would be awesome!  I know it might be a big job to do, especially with families and a day job, etc. If you are capable of compiling Miner Control yourself, it isn't really too difficult to add your choice of YAAMP clone (with the exception of YIIMP, due to no auto-conversion). I've modified KBomba's fork and have FFPool, Hashpower, and (very) basic YIIMP support. What did you do for yiimp, I was debating just adding 1 algorithm to watch for on it, like setting up 1 service per also. Added hashpower to mine as well, next goal is mining pool hub. |
|
|
|
Any plans on adding the YAAMP clones that are popping up?
Should be pretty easy since they expose the same API.
KBomba or StuffOfInterest: Will/Could anyone of you update MinerControl so that it could be used with the different yaamp clones? That would be awesome! I know it might be a big job to do, especially with families and a day job, etc. The way the code is setup, each clone would have to be entered. I got ffpool up and running on my own compiled version. |
|
|
|
dark can not be mined, sync fcked up.Any other profitable coin to mine?
What do you mean exactly? High diff on drk, sync pow to pos stage temporarily messed up, it seems to be working now though 0 coin reward on pow. |
|
|
|
|
Funny that this was mentioned. I was planning on opening a nomp based pool in the upcoming weeks, and wanted to ask if I setup a percentage to go to c&c, would nvidia miners utilize the pool. With so many pools existing already, was hoping this would be a way to get hashes sent my way and to distinguish the new pool from the others. Planning to use the marketing phrase "feeding the green machine", lol.
Been using nomp software for private pools for awhile, and thought supporting c&c directly would be a good option. And yes to the troll from a couple of pages ago, I am proud to say I am a c&c fanboy.
Was thinking something like 1.25% pool, 0.25% c&c. What is everyone's thoughts on this? Worth the time and effort? I certainly hope so.
Also wanted to add, thank you to be Christians for their tireless efforts, and to cbuchner1 specifically, yes the wife let me keep my rig so far, lol.
|
|
|
|
|
Cinni now listed on poloniex
Lol edit, I was too slow.
|
|
|
|
ca1ne....GREAT job compiled great Thank You
NP. Just glad it helped. They accidentally left precompiled files in that folder, so when you were trying to compile it was seeing one already done, I'm assuming for windows and the make process would fail.. or something like that lol, its late. Have a good night. |
|
|
|
obj/addrman.o:addrman.cpp:(.rdata$_ZTIN5boost6detail17sp_counted_impl_pINS_16exception_detail10clone_implINS2_10bad_alloc_EEEEE[__ZTIN5boost6detail17sp_counted_impl_pINS_16exception_detail10clone_implINS2_10bad_alloc_EEEEE]+0x0): undefined reference to `__ZTVN10__cxxabiv120__si_class_type_infoE' obj/addrman.o:addrman.cpp:(.rdata$_ZTISt9exception[__ZTISt9exception]+0x0): undefined reference to `__ZTVN10__cxxabiv117__class_type_infoE' obj/addrman.o:addrman.cpp:(.rdata$_ZTISt13bad_exception[__ZTISt13bad_exception]+0x0): undefined reference to `__ZTVN10__cxxabiv120__si_class_type_infoE' obj/addrman.o:addrman.cpp:(.rdata$_ZTISt9bad_alloc[__ZTISt9bad_alloc]+0x0): undefined reference to `__ZTVN10__cxxabiv120__si_class_type_infoE' obj/addrman.o:addrman.cpp:(.eh_frame$_ZNK5boost16exception_detail10clone_implINS0_10bad_alloc_EE7rethrowEv+0x13): undefined reference to `___gxx_personality_v0' obj/addrman.o:addrman.cpp:(.eh_frame$_ZNK5boost16exception_detail10clone_implINS0_14bad_exception_EE7rethrowEv+0x13): undefined reference to `___gxx_personality_v0' obj/addrman.o:addrman.cpp:(.eh_frame$_ZNK5boost6system12system_error4whatEv+0x13): undefined reference to `___gxx_personality_v0' obj/addrman.o:addrman.cpp:(.eh_frame$_ZN5boost9exceptionD2Ev+0x13): undefined reference to `___gxx_personality_v0' obj/addrman.o:addrman.cpp:(.eh_frame$_ZN5boost16exception_detail20copy_boost_exceptionEPNS_9exceptionEPKS1_+0x13): undefined reference to `___gxx_personality_v0' obj/addrman.o:addrman.cpp:(.eh_frame$_ZNK5boost16exception_detail10clone_implINS0_14bad_exception_EE5cloneEv+0x13): more undefined references to `___gxx_personality_v0' follow collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [BoyCoind] Error 1 What Happen?  ?? will not compile Ubuntu box this is the only wallet I have issues with the other 8 did just fine but this Boy and Girl will not compile beginning to beleave the picture from above it so so true Delete all files in src/obj folder and recompile |
|
|
|
Oh yeah, I just see someone with over 1Ghs scrypt at ipominer.com
1 csshih 1,052,377 49,676.904
2 Wuher 487,407 23,007.792
I smell some ASICs around here. Anyone still mining scrypt ??
from time to time, last time was on BC ( was rather profitable... ) (23MHash, is not necessarily uncommon... but ok, we know there are out...) This most likely is the nicehash rental . The admin of ipominer is even posting in that rental pools post. |
|
|
|
|
Highest, unlimited, but only 7 miners. Majority of miners are on one of the lowest paid tiers.
Miners Speed GH/s
#492 Alive 6.10 0.13888305 0.01% 1561.21 0.10 0.00 No 7 0.0004
#490 Alive 6.00 0.01839692 5.67% 1.39 15.91 0.06 0.10 80 0.0530
#472 Alive 5.90 0.12783510 29.62% 1.69 787.77 13.61 0.35 161 0.3084
#484 Alive 5.90 0.26161980 9.09% 2.49 383.25 8.34 No 249 0.4266
#486 Alive 5.90 0.09758923 0.32% 31.69 4.58 0.05 0.10 4 0.0125
#485 Alive 5.70 0.48990200 0.00% ∞ 0.00 0.00 0.20 0 0.0000
#475 Alive 5.60 0.09712124 0.80% ∞ 12.05 0.18 0.10 0 0.0000
#481 Alive 5.60 0.19590200 0.00% ∞ 0.00 0.00 0.10 0 0.0000
#483 Alive 5.60 0.97990200 0.00% ∞ 0.00 0.00 0.40 0 0.0000
#489 Alive 5.60 0.09790200 0.00% ∞ 0.00 0.00 0.10 0 0.0000
#436 Alive 5.50 0.71617964 26.91% 4.89 4142.87 113.39 No 355 0.6388
#474 Alive 5.50 0.09790200 0.00% ∞ 0.00 0.00 0.10 0 0.0000
#406 Alive 5.40 0.16885492 17.49% 81.82 572.55 12.39 No 5 0.0092
|
|
|
|
current groestlcoin performance on 3 GTX 780Ti (only mild overclock) [2014-04-11 01:54:41] accepted: 111/111 (100.00%), 29119 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-11 01:54:46] accepted: 112/112 (100.00%), 29190 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-11 01:54:50] accepted: 113/113 (100.00%), 29117 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-11 01:54:54] accepted: 114/114 (100.00%), 29186 khash/s (yay!!!)
I am sure we can do better  Christian I was wondering, wouldn't you be able to compile a module and have cudaminer/ccminer check to see if it is present, it uses your custom adaption of the algorithm, if not present uses the sph version. Wouldn't that satisfy gpl, since without the precompiled module it would still be fully functional? Example I have is gpl open source android kernel, that has precompiled drivers for prop hardware, etc. The precompiled module then could confirm that your software is what is calling it. Just a thought, instead of rewriting base code. A simple option would to offer as you do now a precompiled version and have a md5 checksum confirmation from your module. |
|
|
|
|
