Show Posts
Hey, guys, lurker here. I've been reading a lot and looked at a couple of other coins and I know that people are feeling frustrated that this hard fork for the second time didn't go as planned. Although I'm quite new to the bitcoin scene, from what I can tell this is just a small hiccup to development. It seems the developers ARE doing things right (the issues this time were less serious than last time and were able to self-correct); it's just taking them a while. I think we need to remember the DarkSend IS WORKING (although there's are a few limitations to it which will probably be able to be fixed fairly soon after MN payments come out).
Although there are some problems with masternode payments right now, it seems clear to me that improvements are being made (while slowly) and that DRK is the clear leader as it is currently the only coin that actually has the ability to sent coins anonymously RIGHT NOW (although with limitations). Just my personal opinion though.
Although there are some problems with masternode payments right now, it seems clear to me that improvements are being made (while slowly) and that DRK is the clear leader as it is currently the only coin that actually has the ability to sent coins anonymously RIGHT NOW (although with limitations). Just my personal opinion though.
Price of DRK will show how market will decide. Maybe its better price will come down and devs are less stressed with coding because of marketcap.
True, the market price of DRK will decide the confidence everyone else has in it and may have less stress on the devs if the marketcap decreases. But not just talking about price, if you just exclude price from everything ATM, DRK is still the leading coin in terms of an actually functioning DarkSend protocol. All the other coin's anonymous coin-sending function is still being developed/planned.
