Show Posts
So basically what happened was somebody decided it would be fun to trick others and create a fake 468 BTC wallet and sell it cheap to others to trick them into thinking they have a shot at the 468 BTC.
Some people bought it, couldn't crack the key and decided they want to get their money back by reselling it to someone else.
The wallet got resold many many times over and over again and after some forensic analysis it turns out its a fake wallet and there are only 2 Satoshos in the wallet instead of the promised 468 BTC.
This is basically the situation that goes on when someone buys a blacklisted phone. Someone gets an incredible deal and then later on it turns out the phone is stolen and can't be used. So instead of taking the loss, they just resell it to someone else in hopes of getting their initial money back. This is a digital file however and can be resold many times unlike a phone.
In this scenario who is at fault? The one who initially stole the phone and sold it? Or the individuals that bought it and kept reselling because they didn't want to be stuck with a loss?
Some people bought it, couldn't crack the key and decided they want to get their money back by reselling it to someone else.
The wallet got resold many many times over and over again and after some forensic analysis it turns out its a fake wallet and there are only 2 Satoshos in the wallet instead of the promised 468 BTC.
This is basically the situation that goes on when someone buys a blacklisted phone. Someone gets an incredible deal and then later on it turns out the phone is stolen and can't be used. So instead of taking the loss, they just resell it to someone else in hopes of getting their initial money back. This is a digital file however and can be resold many times unlike a phone.
In this scenario who is at fault? The one who initially stole the phone and sold it? Or the individuals that bought it and kept reselling because they didn't want to be stuck with a loss?
All of them are at fault. They all sold a wallet without disclosing very important information, just so they can earn money on their expense. They all sold a wallet that they claimed had 468 BTC without actually knowing that it did. They also all acted like it was their wallet and they knew there was 468 BTC in it. That is a fraud, a scam, for their own benefit. Neither of them should be trusted for any further deals. They are selfish and irresponsible when it comes to other people's money.
Specifically bitcoinicon claimed that it was a legal wallet in the video's title itself and that he is selling it as a lottery. That was all a lie.
qasimilyas99 said that it was his wallet that he forgot a password for it and couldn't crack it because of the lack of GPU. But we know now that he tried cracking it ( he had the hardware for it ) and the guy from btcrecover said it was corrupted as well. Then when he lied all over about it all and changed his offer from sharing coins from a cracked wallet to buying a wallet and sharing nothing. Which shows that he knew at that point about the wallet's problem.
Bottom line is that they all lied either way. Even if bitcoinicon bought the wallet or made it himself, he is still a lier and a fraud. None of them should be trusted.
I have not lied or tried to scam anyone and I am not going to let you or anyone else label me a scammer. This is an attempt to damage my reputation and that is my conclusion.
I've noted email addresses, user names, websites of all parties connected to trying to damage my reputation and will be posting my own threads and will take this matter further even if you think you are safe hiding behind bitcoin talk.
So if youre selling a product and it turns out to be fake, then you did not lie when you claimed it was legit?
