 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
Is the current asset exchange opensource? Can you implement it?
From what I understand it's being tested and ae launch is far away. |
|
|
|
Jean-Luc, one of core Nxt developers:
"NEM and NXTL are trying to innovate and improve on the ideas brought by Nxt, they are apparently re-writing and re-designing everything from the ground up, and will be a healthy competition to Nxt. So they have my respect."
+1 Now I have a little more faith in this NXTL. +2 I was also a bit concerned that the wallet isn't actually functioning, although it looks majestic. But if Jean Luc says it's OK then it's not just OK, it is legendary!  |
|
|
|
I think the distribution is fine. Devs deserves more shares and make sure they are motivated enough. We all will count on them.
I'd say MORE BTC FOR DEVS → LESS SHARES FOR DEVS, LESS BTC FOR DEVS → MORE SHARES FOR DEVS. Either devs and us get more coins because we stop at 1200-1500 stakeholders, or we go up to 2500-3000 stakeholders or higher but devs share become smaller. But I do realize that it is cupidity speaks out of me |
|
|
|
|
I bought some Nas anyway. I suppose if some shitty coins as Ifc or Redd costs 4-6 satoshi with 100B emissions it means Nas sooner or later will cost 40-60. At least.
|
|
|
|
#950  5205073439555471344 |
|
|
|
|
Are you going to sread all coins between investors? No dev fund, marketing fund, nothing?
|
|
|
|
I think good distribution is important.
As I know, NXT had ~ 1500 active accounts in march 2014.
Thats not so much.. Way from 70 to 1500 was veeery long - 5 months.
1500 to 50000 should be faster.
With this coin we're gonna have 2000-3000-5000 at start plus (I hope) fast and nice web client.
Looking at Nxt and Nas I'm starting to think that as smallук number of initial stakeholders as better for everybody. When there are lots and lots of miners they try to dump first and it kills a coin. But when there are say 10 stakeholders they are pretty confident in their future and profit, so they start to sell large parts of their coins through the forum with great profit but still very cheaply. Next wave of investors is much bigger and they buy a lot of coins at pretty good price. Then they start to sell 2-3 times more expensive and so on... Finally they have long steady growth. Yes there are tons of greedy assholes and regular trolls that counts someone else's money, but after 6 months nobody cares how many initial investors got into the coin because by that time it's well distributed and have a great market cap. - P.S. Don't take it to seriously, I'm not a professional investor, just some thoughts out loud So you made 20 sock puppet accounts and you're now wanting the stakes to stop so you get even more, nice. You got it wrong. I have no idea how Nxtl and Nem will be developing and growing because there was no such distrubution models before when thousands of people have small stakes. And 20 stakes won't make any difference, it's just 0.24% of all coins. Several people with 400-600 stakes will make a difference but I doubt it's even possible. I compared POS with small number of initial stakeholders to POW with many miners and I think POS wins. Nxtl type of distribution looks like Nxt on current level, with some difference but still pretty much close, so I believe it'll succeed. And yes, of course I want to stop IPO. Don't you? Now we have 5 stakes per person. If we wait untill there will be 5000 people we'll have 1 stake per person. I'm pretty sure everyone who already have stakes interested in closing IPO asap. Omg, who was I talking to. Checked who the fuck you are to call me a sockpuppet master. "This is the most blatant scam I've seen on this forum." "this coin is sinking fast..." "worst coin ever!" Just another stupid meaningless troll. |
|
|
|
I think good distribution is important.
As I know, NXT had ~ 1500 active accounts in march 2014.
Thats not so much.. Way from 70 to 1500 was veeery long - 5 months.
1500 to 50000 should be faster.
With this coin we're gonna have 2000-3000-5000 at start plus (I hope) fast and nice web client.
Looking at Nxt and Nas I'm starting to think that as smallук number of initial stakeholders as better for everybody. When there are lots and lots of miners they try to dump first and it kills a coin. But when there are say 10 stakeholders they are pretty confident in their future and profit, so they start to sell large parts of their coins through the forum with great profit but still very cheaply. Next wave of investors is much bigger and they buy a lot of coins at pretty good price. Then they start to sell 2-3 times more expensive and so on... Finally they have long steady growth. Yes there are tons of greedy assholes and regular trolls that counts someone else's money, but after 6 months nobody cares how many initial investors got into the coin because by that time it's well distributed and have a great market cap. - P.S. Don't take it to seriously, I'm not a professional investor, just some thoughts out loud So you made 20 sock puppet accounts and you're now wanting the stakes to stop so you get even more, nice. You got it wrong. I have no idea how Nxtl and Nem will be developing and growing because there was no such distrubution models before when thousands of people have small stakes. And 20 stakes won't make any difference, it's just 0.24% of all coins. Several people with 400-600 stakes will make a difference but I doubt it's even possible. I compared POS with small number of initial stakeholders to POW with many miners and I think POS wins. Nxtl type of distribution looks like Nxt on current level, with some difference but still pretty much close, so I believe it'll succeed. And yes, of course I want to stop IPO. Don't you? Now we have 5 stakes per person. If we wait untill there will be 5000 people we'll have 1 stake per person. I'm pretty sure everyone who already have stakes interested in closing IPO asap. |
|
|
|
I think good distribution is important.
As I know, NXT had ~ 1500 active accounts in march 2014.
Thats not so much.. Way from 70 to 1500 was veeery long - 5 months.
1500 to 50000 should be faster.
With this coin we're gonna have 2000-3000-5000 at start plus (I hope) fast and nice web client.
Looking at Nxt and Nas I'm starting to think that as smallук number of initial stakeholders as better for everybody. When there are lots and lots of miners they try to dump first and it kills a coin. But when there are say 10 stakeholders they are pretty confident in their future and profit, so they start to sell large parts of their coins through the forum with great profit but still very cheaply. Next wave of investors is much bigger and they buy a lot of coins at pretty good price. Then they start to sell 2-3 times more expensive and so on... Finally they have long steady growth. Yes there are tons of greedy assholes and regular trolls that counts someone else's money, but after 6 months nobody cares how many initial investors got into the coin because by that time it's well distributed and have a great market cap. - P.S. Don't take it to seriously, I'm not a professional investor, just some thoughts out loud |
|
|
|
|
