You guys are doing a great job and don't get me wrong but you really need to stop making spelling mistakes. I understand that English is not a native language for most of us, but at least spell-check in Word or Google or whatever online dictionary you can find. You can't have a reputable betting site and probably one of the main sections, if not the main one of the site to be named AQUIRE MINERALS instead of ACQUIRE MINERALS (regardless if the link is working or not).

Please pay more attention to detail as this seems totally unprofessional and looks like some things are just put together to make it work. I like you and all and I'm not being a wise-ass - consider this as a constructive criticism.

www.minerals.pro still opens the forum page
while minerals.pro opens up the official website

Hope you guys fix this soon

Why don't we set-up a donation address as soon as the coin is launched. The address will be public and people will donate for the bounties and development. This way we'll have transparency and the dev team will have some stimulus to deliver and the community will be grateful for their efforts and donate. No premine, donations only.

@Dev team, remember community can be quite generous if they see committed team against them. You might get a lot more than that stinky premine.

I think they rather see profit. Big pools and exchanges that is.

Don't get me wrong, the coin looks nice.

A few pages back he DID say that he dumped the premine. I guess this coin is going nowhere from now on. Too bad it just proved to be another scam, with that dickhead CallMeAxis stating: I don't want to create hype, I don't want this coin to be this and that. Oh well, a nice cold glass of water and move on

Someone took a bite from the sell wall on MP. Waiting for a hungrier whale

Hmm
For 51mh/s the 24hr payout from multipool is that:
Last Day    536.11507771
Even with a price of 2.5k that's not more than 0.0125BTC
So that's 10 MIN / Mh / 24Hr

At least I'm supporting the coin, so that's a relief

Hey, could you edit the currency name as it is not MineralsCoin, because we do not want more coins, we want more minerals  So Minerals is just Minerals and that's what we want for people to remember.

Minerals dev please update the pools page on minerals.pro website and put the multipool only since the other pools are irrelevant. Add bleutrade to the exchange section too.

Confirmed! Tipbot works very good, tipping happened in an instant.

Great work guys. You're developing stuff fast. I'm glad that the discussion earlier has come to an end so we can focus on positive posts.

Difficulty is going through the roof - from 70 to 150 and is staying in the lower 150s range

I was gonna suggest a multipool vote with a Yes/No option since we are almost at the end of PoW and we need to figure out is multipool good for the coin or not. So if you guys are OK then we might do the poll for the remaining 6-8 hours and then we'll see.

So is the multipool gonna launch? And if it does will the network hashrate be transferred to it, or we'll just have to point the miners to it? Or we should look for something else to dig after a few hours?

It's working with me just fine

I suggest to release wallet to first 10-20 TRUSTWORTHY members that PMed you Minerals. This I think is enough to show you are a man of your word and we have a working wallet in some respected forum members. The public release I suggest you do around the 20000th block.

Having multiple accounts in different pools should not be an issue. Even dev is suggesting we do that as a failover option. Personally I have tried to mine with one worker but the difficulty gets too high and I get a lot of rejects. So I spread out my rigs on 3 different pools even though some of them are far away and still get a higher reject percentage but its far less than what it was.

At first when I had the workers pointed to one pool I had less than 0.6% rejects. Then when I joined them under one worker the rejects jumped to over 8%. Now I have about 0.8% rejects (and I had to lower intensity to achieve that) on average due to the higher latency. So I guess multiple accounts could be an advantage even to people whose main idea is not to cheat the system.

I don't think there's anything do be done. As already stated:
1. Users can get tons of disposable e-mails for new accounts
2. Proxies exist for registering new accounts and avoiding the last-login-from check which could be used in some cases
3. Rigs can be rented so they are assigned to one account only

Steps 1-3 could be performed countless number of times, and there's nothing we can do to avoid that. Hey as they said Internet provides countless possibilities

Miners might create more than one account on more than one pool. I don't know if that is being monitored by Minerals and do those people's hashrate is being summed up to see if they are abusing the system. And this might go way beyond 300mh/s...

How do you check the number of users?
You have to log into all 6 pools and see the statistics for the last block payout and see how many pages in 10s of users are there.

That's what I did when the 50mh/s limit per account was enforced and I saw on one pool the number of users jump gradually from 26-27 pages to 33-34 pages, meaning that we had on a single pool a 25% increase in users as soon as that limit was enforced.

So I guess if you take out statistics from the 6 pools which consist of current pool hashrate - current user count, then we might have some more info on this strange behavior.