 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3
|
ARK just hit #1 volume on Bittrex  |
|
|
|
Everyone was already completely refunded!Let us know if you encounter any problems or have any questions. We'll bring some news about our ongoing work in due time. If you wish to keep yourself updated with the latest news, subscribe to our newsletter located on our website: http://geekkos.com/And if you haven't yet, you can read our note about the crowdsale and give some feedback to us here: http://goo.gl/forms/6i9HZSkl4cThank you all for your support! Thanks, that was fast Quick question though; I've subscribed to the newsletter very early on shortly after the project was announced, however I didn't receive an email about the launch when it started. Did something happen to my subscription and do I need to re-subscribe? Did you check your spam folder? Could be lost there  You shouldn't need to re-subscribe at all. Try marking our email as a trusted sender  Thanks! Yes, I have, and it's not there.. Was I supposed to get a confirmation email after subscribing? Never got one of those either, maybe I made a typo in my email address  Not a problem, I check this thread regularly anyways |
|
|
|
Everyone was already completely refunded!Let us know if you encounter any problems or have any questions. We'll bring some news about our ongoing work in due time. If you wish to keep yourself updated with the latest news, subscribe to our newsletter located on our website: http://geekkos.com/And if you haven't yet, you can read our note about the crowdsale and give some feedback to us here: http://goo.gl/forms/6i9HZSkl4cThank you all for your support! Thanks, that was fast Quick question though; I've subscribed to the newsletter very early on shortly after the project was announced, however I didn't receive an email about the launch when it started. Did something happen to my subscription and do I need to re-subscribe? |
|
|
|
Too bad it didn't work out this time, Sherlock. I'll be happy to invest again on a next launch because I still see potential in this project Good luck with shaping up things with Geekkos! |
|
|
|
That appears to be the jquery library. To be sure, I compared it with the same version of the script from the jquery website, and both are identical. It has not been tampered with and can be considered safe. |
|
|
|
The link seems to be broken. It works without the 'www' |
|
|
|
While syncing (at least trying to), I got the following error:
WARNING: Invalid checkpoint found! Displayed transactions may not be correct! You may need to upgrade, or notify developers.
Delete everything (besides wallet.dat), wait for a day, then connect again Thanks, after some tweaking I got it syncing up to the last block. |
|
|
|
|
While syncing (at least trying to), I got the following error:
WARNING: Invalid checkpoint found! Displayed transactions may not be correct! You may need to upgrade, or notify developers.
|
|
|
|
...
my 40 WC (about 2 cents)
... .... Looking at Mintpal, there is currently 13BTC needed to get the price at 200sat. That's basically twice the current volume on Mintpal. ... ... ... .... .... I must have missed the promotion and rewarding of holding. Are you willing to promote selling? Isn't that what we've kinda been saying though, we don't want people dumping I don't see how putting the WC from the wallet back to the exchange helps anything, other than those not doing it, and getting more staking. I do not know the coin distribution other than what is on http://www.richlist.eu/whitecoin, and having watched that for some time, the distribution seems to have spread out pretty well. There is definitely some innovations in the works. Operation "Whiteout" gets the most attention, but being a true foundation isn't splashy news until we are able to organize and act as a foundation... which will be soon That was based on the latest talk having WC stakes + bonus WOC staked. I don't promote selling as such, I promote -using- the coin. For trading, for goods, for games, for betting, for anything that gets WC moving. Dumping is not what we want, but what's inevitable on the way up. Most coins are in the community or in investors, many dying to get out for minimum loss, no doubt. Traders have little to no interest in WC at the moment. That's what I observe. I really don't try to be negative here, I just want to create some awareness of what we're up against. I still see great potential in WC if we play our cards right. I like the discussions here about new features, new innovations and I jump in where I think I can contribute, although my time and resources are scarce. Sometimes maybe we get stuck too long in community decisions, but I like the track we're on, save the few frustrations along the way. |
|
|
|
...
my 40 WC (about 2 cents)
... Alot of the rest, i'm mixed on. I'd love to see more adoption and promotion of WC, and I know the volunteer PR team is always accepting volunteers Looking at Mintpal, there is currently 13BTC needed to get the price at 200sat. That's basically twice the current volume on Mintpal. ... The demand is currently at a minimum; any chance surge in price causes small dumps of holders getting a small profit from it, pushing the price back where it was. There's no buy support to sustain a higher price, let alone a steady rise. ... There are many holding large bags now, and given the circumstances, there will be lots of dumping when the price is going up. Many won't wait for prices as high as 500sat or even 1000+ sat. Going from 100 to 150 (4.5BTC from here) is a whopping 50% profit that many WC holders are eager to cash in. The distribution of coins is messed up now, and it will take some time to recover from that. We can't avoid those dumps, and it's needed to even out the skewed distribution. Therefore we need a massive amount of buy support. And there lies the challenge. Let's not let one bagholder feed another bagholder At a snapshot of the current market, Yes. The question is how much of that 13BTC sell to 200 sat is the same person tring to buy at 80 Sat. As ditto with the buy on there, while down to 0 may be about 15 BTC, that doesn't mean as the price goes down, spot buys will be placed. Looking back, when we hit our lowest floor of 77, we somewhat of a nice rally to a real peak of about 170 and over the course of the few day rise, our volume only "kicked up" some to maybe 1% to 2% of total supply. So I will def agree with an early point, that just some volume alone seems to help us. Well, I may have painted a dark picture there, yes, but only to trigger/inspire You can only move the price if you move the coins themselves. Therefore I plead for a stop on both promotion and rewarding a holding stance. Get that volume back to 100BTC minimum! Do you agree the coin distribution is currently out of balance? To gain volume is to have holders take their WC out of staking position and back on them exchanges. And to have innovations and constant updates on the wallet and applications to get the WC-is-back hype going. Let's get #whitecoin trending again  |
|
|
|
The price will never rise if everyone is holding on to their bags, waiting & staking. You can see what is happening with BlackCoin - lots of innovation and news, but everybody is holding on to it expecting huge rise, yet nothing notable happens. It happens with other POS coins too - once it goes POS, people withdraw from exchanges to their own wallets, volume plummets, price follows.
Most of WC holders are in the same boat; waiting for their ROI, many accumulating more while the price is still insanely low; thus more WC moving to bags that won't go anywhere soon. This makes it much harder still to get the price up where it belongs, even with a ton of good news and innovations.
We need to stimulate WC to more buying and selling. Great new coin features to stimulate buying, and (more) places to spend WC for goods/services to stimulate selling/spening. And focus our promotions on that area. Please stop promoting to hold, don't reward staking/holding any more than the stake itself, the real reward should be in buying and selling(spending). I'm not an expert in the field, I don't really have an idea to accomplish this, but for a community coin with lots of ideas, we can get places, right? Apps, games, whatever to throw WCs at.
I'm still no fan of anon (or 'privacy' if you will, same thing diff name), imo it's more (dying) hype than usefulness - and might even bite us in the ass one day. I've followed the discussion for pages about it, but I don't color myself convinced this is the way to go. Maintaining a 'spinoff' coin along with WC seems a hassle, and if it's rewarded by holding WC, I don't see how this will improve the price of WC. And if one takes a blow, the other probably follows. And I don't want to catch myself 'gambling' trading between WC and WOC, risking losing even more than I already did.
my 40 WC (about 2 cents)
Hey Pantalaimon, I've heard similar logic in regards to coin holding before, but have yet to see any true economics on it. As those who want WC buy right now @ 130 Sat, say plan to hold until 1300 Sat. Every WC that person buys, is essentially removed from the supply at the price of 130 sat. Lets say then a market force occurs and causes our price to rise from 130 sat to 500 sat (be nice huh lol) How much ever that person is holding at 500 Sat is still off the market until his magic price of 1300. But each new person buying in at 500 Sat to hold is say planning to hold until (1000 sat) up until 1000 those coins are not in supply. With such a small increase in coins per year of 2%, the price drives up. My math and such isn't good, but in general i'm trying to say... for anyone buying to hold for speculation the price is going up, they're removing the coins that could be sold. If demand was a constant but supply keeps shrinking in this regard, the only nature tendency is for the price to increase. Bitcoin has an expanding coin supply still, but i've heard this situation described. Alot of the rest, i'm mixed on. I'd love to see more adoption and promotion of WC, and I know the volunteer PR team is always accepting volunteers Looking at Mintpal, there is currently 13BTC needed to get the price at 200sat. That's basically twice the current volume on Mintpal.  The demand is currently at a minimum; any chance surge in price causes small dumps of holders getting a small profit from it, pushing the price back where it was. There's no buy support to sustain a higher price, let alone a steady rise.  There are many holding large bags now, and given the circumstances, there will be lots of dumping when the price is going up. Many won't wait for prices as high as 500sat or even 1000+ sat. Going from 100 to 150 (4.5BTC from here) is a whopping 50% profit that many WC holders are eager to cash in. The distribution of coins is messed up now, and it will take some time to recover from that. We can't avoid those dumps, and it's needed to even out the skewed distribution. Therefore we need a massive amount of buy support. And there lies the challenge. Let's not let one bagholder feed another bagholder |
|
|
|
|
The price will never rise if everyone is holding on to their bags, waiting & staking. You can see what is happening with BlackCoin - lots of innovation and news, but everybody is holding on to it expecting huge rise, yet nothing notable happens. It happens with other POS coins too - once it goes POS, people withdraw from exchanges to their own wallets, volume plummets, price follows.
Most of WC holders are in the same boat; waiting for their ROI, many accumulating more while the price is still insanely low; thus more WC moving to bags that won't go anywhere soon. This makes it much harder still to get the price up where it belongs, even with a ton of good news and innovations.
We need to stimulate WC to more buying and selling. Great new coin features to stimulate buying, and (more) places to spend WC for goods/services to stimulate selling/spening. And focus our promotions on that area. Please stop promoting to hold, don't reward staking/holding any more than the stake itself, the real reward should be in buying and selling(spending). I'm not an expert in the field, I don't really have an idea to accomplish this, but for a community coin with lots of ideas, we can get places, right? Apps, games, whatever to throw WCs at.
I'm still no fan of anon (or 'privacy' if you will, same thing diff name), imo it's more (dying) hype than usefulness - and might even bite us in the ass one day. I've followed the discussion for pages about it, but I don't color myself convinced this is the way to go. Maintaining a 'spinoff' coin along with WC seems a hassle, and if it's rewarded by holding WC, I don't see how this will improve the price of WC. And if one takes a blow, the other probably follows. And I don't want to catch myself 'gambling' trading between WC and WOC, risking losing even more than I already did.
my 40 WC (about 2 cents)
|
|
|
|
Haven't heard back yet. I also sent a mail to pool.cleanwatercoin.org about this issue, because the withdrawal transaction doesn't seem to appear in any block according to their logs. All the mined blocks are still there though. As I said, we did some cleanup in the pool. There were many days on May that the pool was mining in a fork. So the blocks that looks that are there, are not the blocks that were mined actually by the pool, but the new ones (block height was off by several 10ths of thousands back then). In other words, if you don't see the transaction in the pool, that means that this transaction took place (along with the mined blocks) in the wrong chain, thus they are invalidated as soon as we tried to clean the net from the forks. When wallets mine in the wrong fork, it's normal that those blocks are not valid when the wallets return to the correct blockchain fork. It's like they never existed. The same of course applies for the coins that were rewarded for the discovery of those blocks and the same for the transactions that were included in those blocks. So just to be clear: my mining efforts were fruitless and those coins were never mine? |
|
|
|
|
Ok let's compile that shit and get it to the exchanges.
Edit: And as I was typing this, I see dev active on twitter with apparently a new wallet
|
|
|
|
Haven't heard back yet. I also sent a mail to pool.cleanwatercoin.org about this issue, because the withdrawal transaction doesn't seem to appear in any block according to their logs. All the mined blocks are still there though. |
|
|
|
|
I have a problem;
I hadn't used my wallet for a while, but when I loaded it up my original confirmed amount is now stuck at unconfirmed.
It's little over 3000 WATER, I collected with a little bit of mining, I moved to my wallet 24th of May
I already tried the newest wallet available, deleted all but my wallet.dat...
I also tried Mindfox's advice on previous page with the config file, but that didn't do anything for me either
Can I still get those coins back?? And how?
|
|
|
|
For the first time in ages I feel like I'm on a train again with WC And plz get that redesigned wallet out there  |
|
|
|
I'm still confused about this whole WOC/WC thing, the mechanics, and how it should get WC back on track again, but I'm thrilled just by the fact I finally some development going on there Nice! |
|
|
|
Hi Everyone,
I understand there is some frustration regarding development of new features, I'd like to take a moment to explain a bit about that.
We are trying to avoid implementing hastily developed features like other coins, which is why we proceeded carefully in regards to Anon. I'm quite pleased with the plan that is coming together and I believe there will be very big and happy news for all of you this week on that front.
In regards to registering the foundation, I understand that to those with more of a technical background the benefits of this may not be clear, but in my opinion is it key to us breaking out of the altcoin market and gaining actual mainstream acceptance. All of the pieces are now in place, all we need to do is see this through as a community and our recovery will be complete.
I'll also take this opportunity to remind you that this coin belongs to you the community. We aren't like other coins. Responsibility in WhiteCoin's future rests with all of us equally. Given the history of WhiteCoin, the entire point of the foundation is meant to be that if you aren't satisfied with current operations, you have a means to participate in its improvement.
My role has always been to facilitate the transfer of control from the old dev to the community. That means when we deliver things like logo contests, it's at the community's request. We offered this conceptual logo six weeks ago but there was some concern in the community that we were making decisions without giving people a chance to have their say, which is why we did the contest to confirm it.
In two months a great deal of work has been done, and I believe the next two we'll see even more. But that depends upon continued involvement by people liike you.
Best regards,
Chris
I agree things shouldn't be implemented hastily, especially things like anon/whiteout. But my main concern is there are no updates whatsoever on the technical development of the coin. All the talk is about the foundation and registering it, but not a single word from the development department. We have nothing to build a hype on future features. Who are the developers at this moment, and what are they working on right now? We have a new logo for what, two weeks now? Shouldn't the wallet be among the first things to be updated with this new and improved design? I'm still holding on to my WC, but my patience is wearing thin. I don't come here as often as I used to, and my focus has shifted to other coins. I don't want to take my losses and cash out, because I still think this coin has lots of potential. |
|
|
|
Here's my MS Paint "WhiteCoin moon is rising" Pic Not a graphics guy,but liked this pic i took a week ago ... With your permission, surfguy72: ... Hot damn that is great! This is what it looks like as a twitter background: https://twitter.com/cryptoseo Neat! |
|
|
|
|
