No one can predict with certainty how the price of Bitcoin will be in the next 2 years, it could increase or decrease.. it's just uncertain. And therefore for people who want to invest their money in Bitcoin need to understand the risks that come with it. They need to understand that Bitcoin investment is more recommended in the long term, such as 1 or 2 cycles, in the hope that in that period of time, extreme volatility that occurs in short cycles will be damped by long-term growth trends.

I guess it is a procedure not of the gambling platform, but rather of GCash itself, because this is a statement from their website:
Because logically, when you use the casino platform, you have to submit KYC which proves that you are old enough to do gambling. So they do not require additional verification just for you to play, except when you make a withdrawal and they detect suspicious activity, maybe they will ask for additional verification.

Sedikit banyaknya perilaku seorang di dunia nyata itu  mempengaruhi mereka dalam memilih social media. Bagi mereka yg mempunyai jiwa ekstrovert, mereka cenderung untuk memilih platform seperti X, IG, atau Tiktok, dimana mereka bisa membagikan kegiatan mereka sehari-hari, berdebat, atau aktifitas online lainnya. Dan apakah terhadap social media yang bisa merubah perilaku seseorang, itu sangat mungkin, misalnya jika seorang terpapar konten-konten hedon secara terus menerus, maka itu bisa menyebabkan seseorang merasa tidak puas dengan dirinya sendiri dan menjadi konsumtif.


Platform social media itu adalah tempat dimana orang bisa berinteraksi dengan orang lain atau hanya sekedar menikmati konten-konten. Tidak ada aturan yang dimana mengharuskan seorang untuk mengungkapkan identitas mereka secara online, jadi anonimitas dalam menggunakan social media itu adalah hal yang harus dilindungi karena tidak semua orang nyaman untuk mengungkapkan identitas mereka secara online.


100% freedom of speech. Apalagi untuk negara yang menganut sistem demokrasi, maka sudah seharusnya kebebasan berpendapat dijunjung tinggi sebagai fondasi utama dalam kehidupan bernegara. Namun tetap dalam hal ini etika bersosial media harus dijunjungi tinggi dan ujaran kebencitan terhadap suatu ras, agama, atau bangsa tidak bisa dibenarkan.


Berbicara tentang keamanan data pribadi itu mungkin adalah urusan dari platform social media itu sendiri terhadap bagaimana mereka mengamankan data pribadi para pengguna mereka. Platform social media populer mengclaim bahwa platform mereka itu mengamankan data pribadi para pengguna mereka, namun saya sendiri tidak begitu yakin terhadap hal tersebut, karena selama itu adalah platform terpusat maka potensi kebocoran data itu tetap ada.


Platform social media terdesentralisasi mungkin menjadi opsi bagi orang yang tidak ingin tunduk pada aturan ketat, sensor sepihak, atau pengumpulan data besar-besaran oleh perusahaan-perusahaan teknologi raksasa. Namun kalau saya pribadi platform social media populer itu sudah cukup.

Why would it be the Aviator betting game's fault when it is clear that the woman knowingly went into debt just to recover her losses? It was entirely her fault that she could not control herself and did not understand her limits in the face of loss, which led her to ignore the risks and continue playing in the hope of recovering what she had lost. If only she had been able to control herself, she might not be in serious trouble because of it. Therefore, it is entirely her responsibility, and not a result of the negative effects of the Aviator betting game.

Why isn't he proud of what Bitcoin has achieved? Is it just because more people are making transactions through centralized platforms that it makes him unhappy? Isn't that the inevitable result of mass adoption, where a technology like Bitcoin begins to be widely accepted? It is only natural that the approach to its use becomes more diverse. Moreover, Bitcoin is still decentralized, and there are still enough people who engage in P2P transactions, so the spirit of Satoshi remains relevant to this day. Unless the use of Bitcoin changes completely and the network becomes controlled by a single party, only then would it be reasonable for him to be disappointed with what Bitcoin has become.

Anxious people should not gamble because it is an activity that can increase stress and worsen their overall mental condition. Especially in gambling, there is a very high level of uncertainty and risk of loss, which can cause anxiety to worsen over time in someone who cannot properly control their emotions and thoughts. This may lead to a loss of focus and potentially result in impulsive decisions that harm them in the long run. Therefore, as an anxious person, one needs to stay away from high-risk activities such as gambling, as it could further deteriorate their condition.

It was just his frustration at the time, it wasn't something to be taken seriously. Moreover, he was still quite competitive, it was just that the Ferrari was a mess, and even Charles admitted that it couldn’t be driven. If Ferrari had a car that was more competitive this season, maybe it would be a different story.

But in a new interview, Lewis said he wasn’t considered a failure after a difficult weekend at the Hungaroring. He just needs some time to relax and recharge during the summer break, and maybe he can come back stronger. Let’s hope for the best.

It makes sense to see how high blockchain transactions were linked to gambling in those years, since the features brought by Bitcoin made it easier for gamblers globally to play, and there were some casinos that accepted Bitcoin with easy registration and no KYC requirements. Moreover, during that time, there were no alternative blockchain networks, and the price of Bitcoin was still relatively cheap, so people did not feel a significant loss when they gambled with 1 or 2 bitcoins. Unlike today, where many gamblers tend to use alternative networks such as USDT or TRX, which are cheaper and faster, rather than using their Bitcoins due to its high value and feel that they will be at a loss when spent it.

Not only are the prices of building materials becoming more expensive, but the wages of builders are also increasing. For example, in my country, if you want to build a house, you need to pay the builders' wages, and that’s not even including their additional needs, such as snacks, overtime pay, and so on. So it's not surprising that the average person ends up spending a lot just on labor costs alone. Although hiring contractors can be an option, it’s still not affordable for many.

The best solution is still to buy a government-subsidized house, as it is much more affordable. However, the requirements are usually more complicated, and the house is often located far from the city center. So this is a bit of a dilemma for people, whether they want to build a house, but it's quite expensive, or buy a subsidized house that is much cheaper, but comes with complicated requirements and is usually located far from the city.

What a boring race. I knew that McLaren would win this race again. Especially when I saw Ferrari's pace drop as early as lap 35, I immediately went to sleep after realizing there was no chance for Ferrari to get on the podium. At this point, it's already clear that other teams are finding it very difficult to catch up with McLaren, and most likely the winners of the WDC and WCC will be McLaren, unless a miracle happens.

Payment ID ini secara langsung menyerang privasi masyarakat, karena dengan sistem ini maka seluruh riwayat transaksi bisa dilacak oleh pemerintah, dan pemerintah dapat membuat profil perilaku belanja masyarakat dan berbagai informasi sensitif lainya. Bayangkan saja data transaksi dari ratusan juta masyarakat Indonesia dikelola secara terpusat oleh pemerintah selayaknya "surveillance financial" yang invasif, artinya data-data ini sangat rawan untuk disalahgunakan, baik oleh oknum dalam pemerintahan maupun pihak ketiga yang memiliki akses langsung kedalam database.

Hal ini tentu akan membuat kekhawatiran bagi masyarakat, karena disamping aktifitas finansial mereka dipantau oleh pemerintah, data sensitif yang dikumpulkan oleh pemerintah ini dapat digunakan untuk tujuan di luar kepentingan pelayanan publik atau diretas oleh hacker. Apalagi pemerintah kita terkenal sangat bobrok ketika mengelola data masyarakat, sudah sering sekali database pemerintah diretas, dan hal ini sangat mungkin terjadi pada sistem Payment ID ini.

Bitcoin will not eliminate banks, because the function of Bitcoin itself is to serve as an alternative to the current banking system. Additionally, banks still play an important role in society, such as providing a place for savings, handling local transactions, offering financing, and more. This means there are still many features of banking that cannot be fully replaced by Bitcoin. Governments also do not appear to support the idea of Bitcoin replacing the role of banks, which is why the use of Bitcoin remains limited and is not recognized as a fully legal means of payment in most countries.

Charles just did something unexpected by securing pole position in this qualifying session. He took pole with a margin of 0.026 seconds ahead of Piastri in P2 and 0.041 seconds ahead of Lando in P3. Even he himself did not realize it at first and did not expect to claim pole position. He managed to deliver a super positive result after a tough qualifying session for Ferrari, where Hamilton could only manage P12. Hopefully, Charles can maintain his performance tomorrow and turn this pole position into a victory for Ferrari. It will be a very difficult challenge, but anything can happen.

There have been many great tips shared by users above, so I’ll just add one more: do not trust anyone on the internet. Many beginners fall victim to scams because they are drawn to the idea of making quick profits without doing enough research. They are tempted by sweet promises, such as guaranteed daily returns or trading bots offering high profits. Anything that sounds too good to be true should be avoided, because 99% of the time, it is a scam. It is much better to deepen your knowledge and always do your own research (DYOR), so you can avoid falling into these traps.

From what I find out from this list https://geekflare.com/crypto/highest-and-lowest-crypto-tax-countries, there are about 16 countries globally that have quite high crypto taxes, around 30% - 50%. Why is it so high because they consider crypto assets to be a form of capital gains or investment gains, which are legally subject to high taxes. Whether or not they will lower the tax in the future depends on their government's policies, and how they view cryptocurrencies. If they felt that it was necessary, they could have lowered the tax. But I doubt it, because most countries are so rare to lower their crypto taxes, on the contrary they are increasing it even more.

It was so justified that they kept silent after this case. Although they are innocent, but the gambling industry is notoriously dirty and quite cruel to people who try to take advantage of the system, and in this case maybe they are worried for their own safety so they have gone abroad, or they have been silenced, we just don't know for sure, but hopefully they are still alive.

McLaren are just very fast, of course. I’m pretty sure they will sweep P1 and P2 again in this race.

As for Aston Martin, it’s a bit surprising that they managed to finish FP2 in the top 5, but I’m not so sure they can consistently maintain that position. At best, they might only finish in the top 10 during the full race.

As for Ferrari, their results in FP2 were quite good. Most likely, the results in FP3 won’t be much different from what they’ve shown so far. And in the full race, they might be able to secure a spot in the top 5.

Even when they ban cryptocurrencies, scams and various financial crimes will still occur in the country, so why do they ban cryptocurrencies? is it true to tackle financial crime or does it cover up their inability to tackle the problem, and make cryptocurrency a scapegoat? but it's funny that while other countries have begun to think about establishing a clear regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, Algeria has gone so far as to ban it and even impose severe penalties that it just doesn't make sense.

Gak perlu heran, pemerintah kita memang tiap membuat program selalu ujungnya hanya menyusahkan masyarakat. Begitu kebijakannya diprotes banyak orang, baru kemudian ada satu orang yang datang bak pahlawan kesiangan. Klasik sekali. Jadi kalau saya melihatnya ini bukan lagi soal ketidaktahuan, tapi pola yang terus berulang. Seolah-olah sudah menjadi bagian dari skenario. Jadi gak perlu heran jika kedepannya ada kebijakan pemerintah serupa ribetnya seperti kebijakan ini, dan satu orang itu muncul lagi bak pahlawan kesiangan.

I feel that Brazil's problems are also very complex, so Ancelotti becoming the coach of the Brazilian national team may not have such a significant impact. Maybe they can qualify for the World Cup, but beyond that, I doubt they will be able to compete against other big teams. Even against Paraguay, they struggled to score, despite having 74% possession according to the statistics. Not to mention that facing strong European teams will likely be even more difficult. So at this point, it is not just about who is coaching, but more about the basic structure of their game, which is still quite chaotic.