Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »
|
Hi all! XDag v0.2.0 is released. Previous release version T13.895 was considered as v0.1.895. https://github.com/XDagger/xdag/releases/tag/0.2.0Github: https://github.com/XDagger/xdagList of changes: 1) New command for pool "LastBlocks N", where N = 0-100. Returns addresses of last N main blocks. This command is intended for improved block explorer. 2) Now it is possible to run terminal server and pool on Windows OS. 3) Several improvements in the GUI wallet: - pool address in automatically stored/loaded - it is possible to change count of mining threads without restart - hashrate - it is easier to copy own address now - selection does not disappear - XDAG icon - and some other small changes Also this release contains a lot of background "cosmetic" changes. Official XDag site: http://xdag.iogood job!! thanks very much
|
|
|
what happend to democats pool, the network show Hash Rate: 10.66 kH/s, and the pool show Hash Rate: 11.17 kH/s ?
|
|
|
The estimated double spend DSH on the Minergate chain are 17,600,000. You are reading it right - 17 million DSH Minergate do not wish to sync to the chain without double spending, so this leave us with no choice.
it seems that cryptopia has updated their wallet, but minergate still on old blockchain? and also this link is on the wrong blockchain? http://chainradar.com/dsh/blocks
|
|
|
Quick update as we have been pretty quiet with the BTC implosion from XT. 5.0 Testing progressing well. A few key people returning from vacation at the end of the month, at which point we hope to unveil the 'secret project' that has been in the works for the past 6 months.
interesting and so mysterious
|
|
|
Probably your Java version. Right now it's only compatible with Java 7. Next update to V 1.2.9 will allow for Java 8 compatibility.
i try to run in ubuntu, it's ok, thank you , i'm gonna check if it's the problem of my java
|
|
|
Is that the reason behind the rapid drop in the number of nodes as well?
There was a malicious group from central asia running a very large amount of nodes that were continuously dumping. They seemed to have moved on. This is a good thing, as Horizon can now return to its uptrend, and people running nodes now are the legitimate holders. It also means people running nodes will receive a higher amount of HZ every day. Update: We have identified the issue, identified the solution, testing is successful and we are creating a zip file for people who are experiencing the problem. People who are stuck on block #236132 are going to have to delete their nhz_db folder and use the one we are about to post to get past that block. I'll post a download link soon. i'm still stuck on block #236132, but i see the web wallet is ok, where can i download the new nhz_db data? Manditory wallet update: https://bitbucket.org/MattWo/nhz-source/downloadsFixed the GUI issue. Download hz_v3.2.2-fix.zip and run the HZ client normally as you would. thank you , i also downloaded this file, but i can't open it in my win7, and i try to run the run.bat in command line to find some err message, but still there none, i don't know what happened
|
|
|
Is that the reason behind the rapid drop in the number of nodes as well?
There was a malicious group from central asia running a very large amount of nodes that were continuously dumping. They seemed to have moved on. This is a good thing, as Horizon can now return to its uptrend, and people running nodes now are the legitimate holders. It also means people running nodes will receive a higher amount of HZ every day. Update: We have identified the issue, identified the solution, testing is successful and we are creating a zip file for people who are experiencing the problem. People who are stuck on block #236132 are going to have to delete their nhz_db folder and use the one we are about to post to get past that block. I'll post a download link soon. i'm still stuck on block #236132, but i see the web wallet is ok, where can i download the new nhz_db data?
|
|
|
Please take a look at the Money Supply so far; also guess you don't know big miners complained a lot at the launch too about the block rewards, cause they can't solo mine blocks too. Issues start with pool mining more or less, network hashrate rocketing up, big miners coming into the nethash, people again complained.
Anyway, what do you guys suggest to me?
Pick a path and stay with it. "You can please some of the people all of the time, you can please all of the people some of the time, but you can't please all of the people all of the time." +10 good point, billotronic! dev, as somebody said you are too idealistic. As a "indivdial miner" i really appreciate what you have done to the guys like me, may i ask, when i use my single pc or rent some vps for mining, and i get many coins due to the max reward of one block, can you assure that i won't dump my coins when it's in a good price? For example i have 100000 XMG, and the price is 100000 sats, that means i could sell it for 100 BTC, and i just used my pc mining for maybe 10 days, with the cost of 10days*6$(electricity fee a day)=60$ total, that means i could earn 100BTC*400$-60$=36000$ in 10 days! maybe you could ask some "individual miners" do not sell their coins, but can you ensure everybody don't sell the coin? i don't think so. when one guy start to sell his coins, the others could follow, cause they fear to lose their money that supposed to be earned by them, you forget that these "individual miners" are still in competition. maybe you think 10m hashrate miner at this time is a big miner, but suppose when a gpu miner comes out someday,and then comes with 1G hashrate miner, will you take the 10m hashrate miner as "individual miner"? i rented some servers to mine xmg, but i canceled all the servers after you made the hard fork, now will sell all my coins at a proper price. there's competition anywhere and anytime, you win or you lose, that's the rule of the nature.
|
|
|
i think maybe cryptonite is the best algorithm in CPUSHARE , it's used by XMR, BCN,
|
|
|
OMG, yesterday 60000sat, today someone sell 5100, what a fu**ing idiot!!!
after dev made a new post, then the price go down  cause somebody know there's more coin coming, they can make profit even at 5100sat
|
|
|
Ok guys, I understand your concern, if you are a big cpu miners, just don't put all your hashing power into the coin; more people joining the mining is more desirable than a single person who has most of the power.
dev, the problem you think is not a mining problem , it's a economic problem, ppl comes for profit, ppl go away for more profit, maybe you should create a system like PTS, BTSX, ppl just buy the share for profit, not mining,, but i think it's the same thing, ppl pay more fees to rent more efficent CPU , so they should get more profit, it's reasonable. i don't know what do you want , if you really want to help more ppl, you could just give your money to them but not ask them to play a hardwork game, if a man is poor and he don't want to work hard, what would you think? is that man's fault ? or your fault? maybe the only thing we could do is working harder, as for this coin, maybe we should do more hard work, eg. make more application for this coin and more cooperation with more business, just like the bitcoin did
|
|
|
Wat ?! You don't want high hashrate ?! Well we can also just put a hardlimit per user on the pools like with RevoCoin, LimiCoin etc.. But how does it makes sense to fork/change algo of the coin as soon as it is accepted and people mining it ? Thats like you change the recipe of Coca Cola as soon as people like it and drink it  Care attention the possibility of existing GPU miners as people suspected, won't hashing rocketing be sign of gpu? that's most people's concern. if there's really a GPU miner, i don't think the hashrate just grow 100M, it must be 1G or more , the guys who developed GPU miner could sell it to a big GPU farm, you know that the big GPU farm have more than thousands of cards, maybe there is a GPU miner for this coin, but they just don't use it, why? cause there's no trading volum of this coin, do you see the buy order in the only exchange? it's only 0.09092916, why would they mine so many coins but don't know how to sell it ?
|
|
|
Ok, here is a one parameter, the optimum diff where gets maximum block rewards, which is not designed well at the beginning (basically selected based on M7, obviously we're not on M7 now), since we don't have fist-hand data regarding M7M. Now I think we could tweak this value a little bit to make it fit into the algo and the community much better. That's basically what I am thinking.
as a miner , i really want to get more coins, but i don't think it's a good idea to turn modify that parameter so early , this is not changing a name or a logo of this coin ,if you change that, maybe the price will go down more quickly and no more people comes, don't you think if people suddenly get rich is not a good thing?? just do more job to make this coin stable, not just ruin it
|
|
|
it's a good thing that the hash grow smoothly,have you guys noticed that the hash grows after noncepool gives the pool miner, maybe you guys should test the new miner yourself, it's much more efficent, i think this is why the hash grows that much, many people changed the miner just like i did this morning
|
|
|
There is a simple solution now.
Close the pools by forking and regroup.
We will support you!!
Hard decision but good luck.
People can easily make a pool.  too many manual intervention will destroy this coin, let the market to choose
|
|
|
[Urgent]
We are on red alert; the network hash rate has rocketed up to 180MHs, twice of yesterday hash. If you're running many cpu miners or you're using Amazon AWS cpu miners, please let me know. You can make a newbie account and post a message here. We NEED to suppress this abnormal network behavior ASAP. PLEASE keep an eye on this thread; we may release wallets for a hard fork as soon as we can. I will propose an approach to deal with this situation, all please look through and comment what you think.
Please be attention, so far 36,632 XMG are mined, and we are targeting at > 5000,000 XMG minted during PoW-I.
i think there must be many people rent many EC2 here, i rented some servers from my friends,but not ec2
|
|
|
Why has everybody jumped ship on nonce-pool? This guy compiled the best pool miner so far and got a lot of hashpower yesterday, why did everybody move over to suprnova? The distribution of the hashpower is a bit disturbing now.
It happend just after it was noticed that there was a problem with payouts. People changed to Nova to get the payouts. The issue was fixed soon but the trillion hash mega guy changed to Nova anyway :-) Now more people coming to nonce, BTW, doubled hashrate in 1 hour. Sorry about the payouts, had confirmations set wrong.  all better now. good job, look at that, whale's coming back, 30M hash now in your pool
|
|
|
|