what they have is not suitable for usage, it's just for show.

yeah it's the same algo.

The current diff calculation algo is probably one of the best in existence. I don't think there is a better diff calculation method that can protect you when your hashrate is under 1GH and a 5-10-20 GH multipool jumps on you. I think the diff retargeting is coping very very well with such attacks where other coins would fork sideways or get stuck at some absurd diff height.

what do you mean tested on 4s ? did you compile the electrum client for the 4s (and did not share) or did you mistakenly quote the electrum post and wanted to quote the android wallet post ?

it's not a doublespend attack because there are few to no transactions in the blocks. this is a reorganization for sure. I'll ask the dev to look it up but they're common and all algos have them from time to time.

this.

Part 1, the total number of coins:

What lead troll here doesn't realize (I prezume he does but ignores in order to further troll) is that when there is a fixed cap on coin production the actual number of coins is irrelevant.
Think of it as a pie, no matter how you slice it up, be it 2,000,000,000 , 2,000,000 or even 2,000 pieces it doesn't change the total quantity of pie you have. Same with a coin's value. If myriad would have had a total of let's say 2M coins instead of 2B you would not have 4 mil myr right now, you'd have 4000, and the total value would be the same. coin production would be of a total of 2800 coins per day and if now you could get about 600 coins per scrypt mh per day then you could only get 0.6 coins per day.

tl;dr VOLUME IS AN ILLUSION WHEN THERE'S A FIX PRODUCTION CAP BECAUSE IT'S DIVISIBLE AND CUTTING A PIE IN 6 PIECES OR 60 PIECES OR 6000 PIECES DOESN'T MAKE YOU HAVE MORE PIE.

Part 2, coin production:

The fact that the first halving is so far away ensures a fair and wide distribution for adoption purposes. Only scammers and daytraders would say that a short lived distribution is better because then the price is easier to manipulate since no new coins come into play. But a fast distribution will only make a few rich while leaving others complaining they didn't have time to understand the concept or the dev instamined the coin for quick gains or some other shady stuff, which really is true, any coin with a halving faster than at least 4-6 months is only doing it for the profits because there's no actual way you'd be able to ensure a fair distribution for your coin in such a short time if you trully intend to create a coin and not a trading asset whose sole purpose is to generate a quick buck.

tl;dr Long halving is good for a coin if that's what you trully want : A COIN, A CURRENCY, SOMETHING DESIGN TO BE USED AND SPENT NOT TRADED FOR A FEW QUICK BUCKS.

myriad clone seasoned with a little extra scam (ipo+premine) yayyy.

implying he's holding 4 mil when he dumped like 4-5 times already (in his mind).
lol.

yeah devs, you should.

darksend is exposed to a new form of attack because of its master nodes. If someone holds a sufficient amount of these nodes they can do bad stuff to the network

I like foodie's "filthy sense of humour", as they say "don't take life to serious, you won't get out alive"

hmmm electrum multisig wallet, these boys are serious about their coin.

So true... or is it ?

money hungry sociophats everywhere ... this could escalate to something really entertaining like life threats other delicious endeavours.

I hope this doesn't lead to a huge dump, I just bought some.

This is what happens when a coin's sole purpose is to make people money. People start fighting because it's all about the $.

that's a misconception, it's enough to sustain all miners dumping daily income, that doesn't account for holders moving in and out.

I like Myriad, it's a good step towards the future.