Forum administrators read the messages you send to other users.

I sent a private message to another user about deleted posts and minutes later several dozen of my posts were deleted by the 'administrator'.

Be careful with any private messages you send on this forum.

There is no block explorer so it makes no sense to buy. These old coins often have an 'extra' supply that has been quietly mined in cryptowinter, so without an explorer an exchange is only a place for the people who hacked the coin to dump.

DGC Pros
1) Network is very active and distributed across a lot of countries https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dgc/#!network

DGC Cons
1) Latest wallet is from 2019 https://github.com/lomtax/digitalcoin
2) Download links missing on this site https://digitalcoin.co/downloads/
3) This site is expired https://digitalcoin.tech/
4) Last Twitter post 2018 https://twitter.com/DigitalcoinORG

We are too far from the topic of digitalcoin.

The world will become a cauldron of melting pot chaos. We'll leave it at that.

Meanwhile digitalcoin is beginning to blast off.

The downloads at https://primecoin.io/downloads.php still work.

It looks like Sunny started another coin at some point and attracted some kind of harassment or hostility on social media so he stepped back.

The wallets work and there are plenty of nodes.

A person can go to the network tab at https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpm/#!network and get node lists then open the wallet console to add nodes, but it shouldn't be necessary since the wallet catches nodes on its own

There seems to be enough people running nodes

https://www2.bytestamp.net/peers

but the link to the github wallet is broken

Microsoft teams for online lectures sounds like something which might require an enforced modification of browser policies, but in many cases the message is intended for average users who do not join any 'teams', and don't like a 'team' manipulating their browser.

"Managed by Your Organization is a Google Chrome feature which, if enabled, can be seen on browser’s menu along with ‘This Device is Managed by Your Organization‘ line. By default, this feature was provided in order for network administrators to set browser usage policies for users within organization. However, regular home users can suddenly notice this warning as well and not surprisingly, it can seem slightly suspicious, especially when it prevents the user from changing certain browser’s settings."

https://geeksadvice.com/remove-chrome-managed-by-your-organization-browser-hijacker/

"If you are a part of some organization, then your administrator can apply various settings/policies which is OK. However, when you are not a part of any organization and see such a message on your personal computer, it might irritate you. But there is nothing to worry about. Thankfully, there is a built-in feature in Windows 10 that can help you get rid of this message for Firefox as well as Edge browser."

https://www.thewindowsclub.com/your-browser-is-managed-by-your-organization-says-firefox-edge

It's encoded in the first post. Don't provide encoded information online, but the original clue was https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/NASDAQ-LTBR/

There has been some kind of massive game going on with Uranium for a while.

For decades it was the easy greenhouse solution, it could have easily dropped CO2 to near insignificant levels. That would have eliminated oil influence though, and a few accidents, in Russia and Japan, final nails in the coffin. But recently, last 5 years, the U.S. government seems to have been engineering a shortage of Uranium. It is probably a group of oil industry bigwigs behind it, and the goal is probably a transition from 'oil control' to 'green mineral control' including nuclear fuels. Uranium is cheap and common, so it would be hard to make money cornering it unless a shortage was deliberately engineered first.

Russia and the U.S. have always cooperated in oil corruption, but the Chinese chop heads like there's no tomorrow when it comes to corruption, and they have access to a lot of green minerals, rare earths etc through Burma and other controlled areas.

Bringing China into the fold is risky but necessary, and they are slowly being brought in.

One thing in the article, kind of obvious and you probably saw it, but I'll point it out anyway.

If you take the third letter of each sentence that begins with a vowel, then run it through a rot13 encoder, it spells "Buy uranium in 2021".

The article was written in 2010, so it's kind of weird, but who knows. The U.S. is building an experimental modular reactor and China has already made some advanced prototypes of small modular reactors designed to power only a small number of houses.

https://interestingengineering.com/the-us-military-plans-to-build-mobile-nuclear-reactor-in-idaho

The big issue is still proliferation, for some reason kids like to use weapons from previous generations, and there is a company which focuses mainly on designing proliferation resistant fuel.

https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/NASDAQ-LTBR/

It's an extremely risky company, hence market cap is about $30m, but it is on Nasdaq and the people in the company are thoroughly plugged into the nuclear clique in the U.S. government.

You could buy some of that then if it goes high enough you could corner the dgc market like Elon Musk did with doge, and be on your way to fatness laziness and richness.

I'm not authorized to share that information, a person has to extract it from the article.

There have been a lot of projects which involve creating a trustable online identity, even entire coins built around that idea.

Just two examples, but there are dozens.

https://nameid.org/

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/civic/

Of course if you have some definitive way to value identities to eliminate spam then you could do the 'human verification' part of idena by using trusted identities. A lot of effort has gone into that type of thing both by official mainstream projects and non mainstream e.g. crypto.

If you eliminated that 'verification' step then you would sort of have a modern version of huntercoin, a human mined coin, but without the game part. You would have to find something for the verified identities to do to earn coins.

That's an excellent concise summary of progressiveness, but isn't there some objective rule a person can trust?

It has been common practice for all of history for one powerful group to knock a weaker group to the ground then absorb their wealth and power. The modern day spin is to also exterminate their identity as a group until they are fully assimilated.

Hundreds of tribes in the 'United States' have gone extinct this way, several in the last 10 years.

Hundreds of tribes have gone extinct in China, Tibet is rapidly going down that path, along with others.

Tibet once had a very important group of sciences they were developing, today almost nobody is even aware because as a tribe gets assimilated it quietly eliminates the sciences / forks in knowledge that it created.

U.S. conquest of indigenous tribes was swift and thorough so there is not even residue of what their sciences were.

What would be required to say definitively either 'it is' or 'it isn't' good or bad to eliminate sciences and tribes for political gain?

Would it need some conclusive evidence of a harm that reached a certain level, a genetic harm, for example? A very precise and specific question, not rhetorical.

Most of it needs to be translated before it can be understood, but I studied gibberish in school and understand a bit.

The gist is that humans, and all animals, are the product of two microbial lineages.

Sort of like lichens are a mix of two species which form one organism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lichen

So humans started as some sort of organism like a lichen and evolved, with the two original microbes creating a mitochondrial, or female, and a nuclear, or male, lineage.

The article then discusses the transfer of information between the evolved products through, for example, horizontal gene transfer.

https://www.nature.com/articles/nrg2386

The implication is that this 'transfer of information', an example of which is hgt, becomes more complex as creatures evolve, so a person's 'genetics' would be getting, and assimilating, information from simple contact with microbes, but manifesting it in a, so far, less visible way.

Any microbe a person comes into contact with would exchange 'some' genetic information, altering the dna in both sides, and a microbe which created a strong reaction in a person, e.g. a disease pathogen etc probably provides more 'information'.

There are a lot of complex implications for humans, but in general it is bullish for digitalcoin.

Do you mean that you might support the bad guys if you knew which was which?

Everybody is of indigenous descent, but melting pots have created a paradigm in which full blooded indigenous occupants of a territory should be assimilated and their bloodlines exterminated in favor of 'the global melting pot'. This creates a long term genetic problem for humans, and until enough people spot the problem the best thing is simply to support indigenous sovereign survival and territory.

Yes, N Korea is a puppet. Any Westerner can go into North Korea and purchase high ranking officials at bargain basement prices then pull their strings. It's a great cash cow for the defense industry. N Korea's first 'nuke' was just a pile of conventional explosives, but western defense salesman, working for weapons sellers, succeeded in getting it painted as a real nuke so they could pump sales.

People pour into the United States for high paying jobs of course. It has nothing to do with liberty or the star spangled banner. The U.S. has used its clout to inflate dollar value relative to other currencies / economies so it is a financially attractive place. Every country gives more liberties as their economy expands and less as it contracts, so U.S. liberties are in a contraction phase.

People also go to Saudi Arabia to work, and any other country where they can get more money. In melting pot economies 'liberty' is a direct function of economic power.

Your final comment misses the danger pretty thoroughly.

"The bottom line, we're all under attack by the NWO both indigenous and newly-indigenous with Western ideals. They want us culled like those in the Holocaust in WWII. They're using Bioweapons and the vaccine to do it."

There is a very distinct difference in vulnerability between a homogenous indigenous group and a melting pot.

Any homogenous indigenous group can be exterminated by a single virus engineered by any person who has the knowhow.

Here is an article that would shock the world if it were translated into intelligible language.

It has some very basic information that could cause political upheaval, for bad or good who knows, but the truth is the truth.

https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/the-two-empires-and-three-domains-of-14432998/

I have always been a gifted bullshitter. It's an art. But be careful if your life depends on facts.

For years western governments have been hacking bitcoin and claiming it was the North Koreans.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2021/02/09/north-korean-hackers-accused-of-biggest-cryptocurrency-theft-of-2020-their-heists-are-now-worth-175-billion/

The story has always been that North Korea has an army of secret hackers who outwit the West at every turn.

Then Ethereum Guy goes to North Korea, finds out they don't know what digital currency is, and explains he works for a scamcoin called Ethereum.

What exactly was the crime in sharing a technology with people who can't afford to use it?

https://news.bitcoin.com/former-ethereum-dev-virgil-griffith-pleads-guilty-to-north-korea-charge-enters-plea-deal-for-6-5-years-report/

In the United States, prosecutors receive extensive training in getting false confessions and getting people to plead guilty.

Should people be more concerned about N Korea or the U.S.?

"For every 8.3 executions in the United States, one innocent person on death row has been exonerated."

https://reason.com/2021/09/27/185-americans-wrongly-sentenced-to-death-have-been-freed-in-the-last-half-century/

There are a lot of things in that which I disagree with.

1) Saying "some tribes chose to cooperate with the invaders hoping to defeat their former perceived enemies" is an example of oversimplifying things to the point of meaninglessness. Guessing somebody else's motives you should be careful. In this case your statement is both true and false, but it muddies the water.

2) China and Britain are very similar historically, only China has been making the mistake for longer. Everything you say about China, there are Westerners who say the same about Britain/U.S./Australia. Britain/U.S./Australia plays an elaborate game of a) forcing conquered tribes to submit, then b) re educating their children to serve the original conquering society, then c) using those trained subjects as soldiers to grow the empire in more and more hidden ways. China does the same, but in a less global way and with refinements it has learned over thousands of years.

3) Defense corporations don't need foreign consumers? What? There is a saying 'the business of America is business'. Prostitution of any kind requires the presence of an outside party. 'Defense' is a code word for 'We have guns, you have money, fork it over'.

4) real peace between the PRC and USA? It's like a rapist and a murderer are running rampant and you want them to work together? Newsflash they are already working together.

5) You say "I am a big fan of china because it doesn't impose things on me or even attempt as long as I am not in china, contrary to the usa...

for me china is a place that offers, not a place that imposes." It's sad to see people brainwashed by any corporate entity, whether China or U.S./UK/Aus or any other. China, like U.S./UK/Aus. does not give you anything. It takes from you, then offers what it has taken and kills you if you are not grateful for the thief trade.

6) re 'chosen people of' etc, that is another colonial trick in both directions. You can spend a while studying European analytical psychology, CG Jung etc, and you will see better the problem. Everybody has 'a god' or even 'many'. Saying 'yours is not real but mine is' is not actually criticizing the external 'gods' but the originating path of a group of people.

There are genuine paths that have roots and are based in reality, neither comminism nor christianity nor any political or religious group effort falls in that category though.

At this point, China is not threatened by the west. Like the U.S., its biggest enemy is itself. For all of history there has always been one or two groups on top. Now its becoming China's turn, where it will do the same as all previous have done i.e., it will fantasize it's supremacy in all things based on its ability to conquer those who invest less in weapons.

There have always been plagues.

What has changed is the fragility of humans.

10,000 years ago a 9.0 earthquake was exciting for a short while, but today it can level a city so it's a big deal.