Show Posts
|
Pages: [1]
|
Hi everyone, I would like to hear your opinion on why a large number of people continue to use DeFi of Ethereum, if it is possible to use the DeFi of other ecosystems with lower fees, faster transaction speeds and better APY for farming in DEXs.
Just to give an example, if people use Aurora (EVM that runs on NEAR Protocol), they will get really cheap gas (0.01$<), almost instant transactions, and great APY for farming liquidity.
|
|
|
The entire crypto market is falling again today, but is this the first time? Didn't it fall the same way in 2021 before the new ATH? And remember what was the level of greed and fear at $40,000 a year ago and now? I see this drop as an opportunity to buy fundamental tokens at a good price. I bought NEAR, Sol, Aurora, Harmony, Link, ADA.
Also a good reason to believe that this is just a correction is the fact that the largest venture capital funds continue to invest money into the market. For example, a month ago Three Arrows Capital bought 156K ETH, or just recently A16z, Alameda, Three Arrows Capital held another round of investment and invested $150M in NEAR Protocol, which indicates that serious guys like a16z and Alameda still believe in growth.
|
|
|
Personally, I think NEAR Protocol can compete with Ethereum, this is the L1 blockchain made by the guys who worked at Google and Facebook, as well as the winners of the world programming olympiads. NEAR has a transaction speed of up to 2 seconds and a gas price of <$ 0.01, and it is also environmentally friendly. But the most important thing is that NEAR launched sharding, and the number of shards will increase every year, which means that NEAR Protocol will be able to withstand any load on its network, and the speed of transactions and the price of gas will always remain the same fast and cheap. Sharding is really important, look what happened to Ethereum and Avalanch when they gained popularity and got a big load on their network, how much price of gas grew in their network, it should not be so. I think NEAR can easily compete not only with Ethereum but also with other cool L1 blockchains.
|
|
|
I always try to buy fundamental projects that are not on the hype right now, I believe that when the HYIP reaches them (and this will necessarily happen, the fundamental coins eventually all get the hype), I will already be in the rocket and will not buy at a high price. Now in my portfolio there are such fundamental projects (which are not yet on the hype) such as Rose, NEAR, Ardana, Aurora
|
|
|
I think that many other L1 blockchains have already become no worse than Ethereum, after the release of ETH2.0 projects from the Ethereum Ecosystem will have a choice whether to switch to ETH2.0 or use a bridge and switch to a faster L1 blockchain (for example, Solana, NEAR, Avalanch, Polygon), and considering how much $ these projects allocate for the development of their ecosystems, I think many dex, launchpads, and other projects from the Ethereum Ecosystem will switch to faster blockchains.
|
|
|
Hi guys, as many of you know, that the Ethereum team has been developing ETH2.0 for a long time, and it will launch some day. I would like to discuss with you, what will happen after the launch of ETH2.0? Will it be crash of Ethereum or its rise and prosperity? Personally, I believe that after the launch of ETH2.0, Ethereum will end, I will explain: now there are a huge number of cool L1 blockchains in which, according to their characteristics, are already much better than ETH2.0, for example (Solana, NEAR, Polygon, Avalanch), and all these blockchains have a bridge with Ethereum, so when ETH 2.0 are launched ,projects from the Ethereum Ecosystem will have to choose whether to launch them on ETH2.0 or use bridges and switch to better blockchains, and I think that they will decide to switch to other blockchains, and we will see how projects such as Avalanche, Near Protocol, Solana, Polygon will start replenishing every day with new projects from the former Ethereum ecosystem
|
|
|
Friend, listen to my experience, invest only in projects that have a future, do not buy any meme coins, they do not carry any technology behind them, this is just a hype at the end of a bull market. You need to invest in projects that can create something truly valuable, the best thing now, as I think, is to invest in fundamental L1 blockchains, here's an example: (Dot, NEAR, Elrond, Solana, Algo ...) Good luck!
|
|
|
To be honest, I have not met meme coins on the Tron network, what about NEAR, then there are a couple of meme coins, but they are unlikely to be suitable for speculation, these are mainly coins made by the community for the community, transactions in NEAR are very cheap, and people are just in jokingly send each other these coins. I think most of all meme coins now appear in BSC because this network is now very popular and compared to Ethereum, the commissions are quite cheap, and also BSC has a well-developed ecosystem and there are many launchpads and dex that will gladly list your "meme coin"
|
|
|
Hey everyone, I noticed that many successful projects that are now in the top50 by Coinmarketcap conducted their public sale on the coinlist (for example, Solana, NEAR, Algo, Flow). All these projects have given investors a huge profit and continue to grow in value. I think it’s a matter of the fundamental nature of the projects, but how does the coinlist determine whether a project is fundamental enough to conduct a public sale on their site or not? Any thoughts?
|
|
|
|