yeah, this is true, can't compare the fees at this point. Sure, you can compare the tech, but not the fees until it gets users on board. But i don't agree with you in regards to being open source from the start. Although i am against closed source projects, i do agree with getting a head start and after that going open source. The crypto field is like the pharmaceutical field; New tech needs to be held hidden until a certain point is reached or all your work can be swept under you in a second. No point in debating what someone with a thousand times more resources than you can achieve, given he has access to your work.

from the start, i'm already invested in this. That info is wrong, there is no payment to token holders. The advantages of holding the token is % fees reduction for using the dex and beeing able to participate in the network as a guardian/titan (DYOR if you want to know what these functions are). There is no staking or free stuff from holding the token. One of the best advantages over Thorchain (from my point of view) is that transactions are done trustless, not with the usual third party actor. The product is already out, unfortunately as a downloadable app (which is frowned upon in the crypto world) so that's why because of their own inhouse developed tech, a webdex is on the works.

Hope this helps!

As far as i understand it, it's exactly the opposite of what you're saying. You're always in control of your wallet and trades are done between real assets... it's a direct swap between BTC - ETH, real assets, not wrapped assets.

well, can you back that up with some numbers, like... using the beta parameters?

well, i do have to say that i've heard more and more about it .. especially since the DEX came out (BETA phase, but still, it's out and it works). I'm wondering why it's still so unknown  ... but i do like that they launched in a bear market... they have confidence.