Bitcoin Forum
May 29, 2024, 07:06:30 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Other / Meta / Re: APPEALING FOR SYKT62 on: September 10, 2021, 06:46:10 AM
You have created an appeal against your ban. But did you know that you are prohibited from writing everywhere except this topic as long as your account is blocked?
It seems that the ban does not bother you much, since I see that you also write today in other topics. This is an additional negative point to solve your problem.
And yes, you copy your posts after a few months to the forum without providing links. Tell me, how can I know that these are your texts. I just inform everyone that this user is far from knowing the rules of the forum.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5359161.msg57899790#msg57899790  Ban evasion.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5350121.msg57879953#msg57879953  Ban evasion.

25. Ban evasion (using or creating accounts while one of your accounts is banned) is not allowed.[e]
Sorry, I do not know aware of the ban evasion rule. However, if you see any positiveness. You can allow unban it. And I can't delete other threads of this account. Please, if you can delete it. And many writing platforms are upgrading. Bitcointalk's moderators should also need to upgrade. I thought, they will understand, who is the author, like other crypto writing platforms do. But now I realise, not all platforms perform the same.
2  Other / Meta / Re: Some Bitcointalk memes on: September 10, 2021, 06:07:41 AM
Uh....those are two of the most un-funny, pointless memes I've ever seen--and I'm not talking about just bitcointalk memes, I'm talking about all the memes I've ever seen.

I'll show them here since you can't post images.




Just don't bother with this sort of thing.  Please.  I don't know how old you are, but if you're a child I apologize.
You cant expect any high entertained memes from a newbie. However, at least I tried. You should be positive or giving instructions on how to improve or how to be more careful about posting, not being toxic. And I know you are not a kid. So, I can't apologize.
3  Other / Meta / Some Bitcointalk memes on: September 09, 2021, 08:12:43 PM
I was spending some leisure time. Created some memes. Hope so, these are not created before.



4  Other / Meta / Re: APPEALING FOR SYKT62 on: September 09, 2021, 12:17:16 PM

Verified
This shows you are truly the owner of the original article. Did you reply the email address in your ban message? Send there details of the updated article and wait for a feedback, you'll get an answer from one of them (email or this thread)
Good day @hilariousandco, you can consider unbanning this user.
Thanks, I will be more careful in publishing any post in future. Btw I didn't get any email or reply for banning. Waiting for further confirmation.
5  Other / Meta / Re: APPEALING FOR SYKT62 on: September 09, 2021, 11:57:41 AM

But, in these cases, wouldn't it be better that if I publish an article elsewhere and republish it here, I add something like, "this article was originally published in xxx..." I'd say I've seen it sometime, not on this forum.

Otherwise, what the OP has done, if what he says is true, is not plagiarism, but it's not 100% honest either.
Yeah that my mistook. I don't give any reference in the article. I should follow it. However,
https://imgur.com/ADxMwcJ
https://imgur.com/435DwkM
and here is the link where I updated my appealing form : https://www.publish0x.com/saikots-blog/what-is-your-ultimed-goal-in-crypto-xlyplwd
6  Other / Meta / APPEALING FOR SYKT62 on: September 09, 2021, 11:30:55 AM
My account sykt62 was banned for publishing a plagiarized article. For my clarification, first of all I am a crypto blogger, so I write articles and publish them on different platforms like publish0x.
Some days ago, I was banned for publishing an article titled: "What Is Your Ultimed Goal In Crypto?"
This article was published long ago from my leofinance and publish0x profile.
You can verify them. https://www.publish0x.com/saikots-blog/what-is-your-ultimed-goal-in-crypto-xlyplwd
or https://leofinance.io/@sykt/what-is-your-ultimed-goal-in-crypto
For more verification: https://imgur.com/lemciel
https://imgur.com/4H3cBRP
Please verify and release sykt62

7  Other / Meta / Re: Plagiarism: Where Do We Draw the Line? on: September 07, 2021, 09:18:32 AM
Plagiarism destroys one’s reputation, the penalty is an immediate ban of the user. IMHO many newbies tend to plagiarise because they don't read the rules and guidelines.
“No idea is completely new, only evolving” Many writers get ideas and inspiration from other writers, but you cannot copy a chunk of sentences from another writer word for word without being accused of plagiarism. Paraphrasing doesn't help either. Plagiarism can be accidental or intentional. Example of intentional plagiarism is when a post is written in one language is rewritten in another and posted in local board without citing the original poster. I don’t quite know where the forum stands on accidental plagiarism. When newbies ( I use newbies as a case study because I believe they are more likely to plagiarise although I do not have the stats to prove that) are interested in a particular topic they gather all sorts of information, this may eventually cause problems distinguishing between common knowledge, facts and information that needs citation.
I personally faced a problem that one gets banned only for publishing own articles. Mod bens for plagiarism, but don't understand why they banned them from publishing their own article. He was a crypto blogger, used to publish the same article on different platforms. If other social platform does not interrupt then getting banned is hard to see. I think moderators should update the system to justify the members.
One user works day by day to contributes to the country and builds a reputable profile but one flag can destroy the dignity.
Note It's all my own opinion.
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!