Show Posts
any news on when next version gonna be?
because my 6600xt is not recognised yet by PM v5.7b.
is there a chance the hashrate will be better on new version that recognised it or is it gonna be the same?
because i can't use all that AMD settings for my 6600xt.
because my 6600xt is not recognised yet by PM v5.7b.
is there a chance the hashrate will be better on new version that recognised it or is it gonna be the same?
because i can't use all that AMD settings for my 6600xt.
I have a rig running 4 x RX6800XT under PM 5.7b and it is ok but not yet perfect but acceptable for now much better than the week of downtime i had getting there. See my recent posts for the way to go to mine RX6000 series under Linux it doesnt appear to be a PM problem but but rather an opencl driver issue related to ROCM? and correct kernels to consider.
I am using Manjero at present but currently building a ubuntu image in the hopes of resolving stale share issue with better ROCM opencl drivers, but so far below is an example of performance under linux for these cards and I will say i like the RX6000 even if the prices are jacked up they run quiet with there massive heatsinks and even without fans on for periods very nice for primary indoor heating source so thats a massive saving on not having to turn the heating on thru winter and all is considered in the Return of investment calculation although i do mourn for my RVII as they where special.
Right now I put £35 a week electric in and get out £70 plus free heating. Bring on the depths of winter I am ready.
Eth: Mining ETH on eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999 for 3:51
Available GPUs for mining:
GPU1: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (pcie 3), OpenCL 2.0, 16 GB VRAM, 72 CUs
GPU2: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (pcie 7), OpenCL 2.0, 16 GB VRAM, 72 CUs
GPU3: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (pcie 10), OpenCL 2.0, 16 GB VRAM, 72 CUs
GPU4: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (pcie 13), OpenCL 2.0, 16 GB VRAM, 72 CUs
GPU1: 47C 49% 154W, GPU2: 50C 49% 156W, GPU3: 50C 49% 158W, GPU4: 45C 49% 159W
GPU1: cclock 1200 MHz, cvddc 868 mV, mclock 1074 MHz, Tj 53C, Tmem 66C, 420 kH/J
GPU2: cclock 1200 MHz, cvddc 868 mV, mclock 1074 MHz, Tj 58C, Tmem 68C, 408 kH/J
GPU3: cclock 1200 MHz, cvddc 862 mV, mclock 1074 MHz, Tj 57C, Tmem 70C, 409 kH/J
GPU4: cclock 1200 MHz, cvddc 868 mV, mclock 1074 MHz, Tj 54C, Tmem 62C, 407 kH/J
GPUs power: 627.0 W; total power: 827.0 W; cost: 4.57 USD/day; 312 kH/J
Current -gt 15,15,15,15
Eth: Accepted shares 397 (91 stales), rejected shares 0 (0 stales)
Eth: Incorrect shares 2 (0.50%), est. stales percentage 22.92%
Eth: Maximum difficulty of found share: 8659.5 GH (!)
Eth: Average speed (5 min): 243.789 MH/s
Eth: Effective speed: 232.74 MH/s; at pool: 232.74 MH/s
Eth speed: 250.439 MH/s, shares: 397/0/2, time: 4:47
GPUs: 1: 64.730 MH/s (101/1) 2: 56.211 MH/s (98) 3: 64.730 MH/s (105/1) 4: 64.769 MH/s (93)
6800 is supported and recognised by PM v5.7b. while 6600 is not yet recognised by PM v5.7b.
and i'm not gonna use linux. too much hassle. i rather use windows.
thanks for pointing it out tho i wouldnt mine with 6600's unless i found a lorry full in a field lol. As for Linux it can be challenge but very rewaring to break free of MS tho sometimes it can make one want to smash things up in a rage if its not bad enough learning new HW then throw in an unfamaliar distribution i been on Ubuntu till now having moved to Manjaro to get these 6800s singing without windows such is the passion for that here.
i never asked you to mine with 6600 and i don't care if you want or does not want to mine with 6600XT. that's not the issue.
people mine with what they want to mine. 6600XT uses very little wattage. that's why i use it.
and 6800 prices is what kept me away. i'm not some rich person that suddenly started to mine.
i've been mining for years. i started mining using 1x GT 730.
this is why i don't like chatting with people that worship linux.
