Bitcoin Forum
July 09, 2024, 12:35:54 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [70 TH] mmpool.org - 1.5% fee split DGM/PPS - tx fees/vardiff/merge mining/tor on: November 02, 2014, 09:47:50 PM
I can't say that the history of this pool hasn't been interesting! Bravo mmpool, Bravo.

Cheers!
2  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [70 TH] mmpool.org - 1.5% fee split DGM/PPS - tx fees/vardiff/merge mining/tor on: August 20, 2014, 01:40:29 AM
Down again?
3  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [70 TH] mmpool.org - 1.5% fee split DGM/PPS - tx fees/vardiff/merge mining/tor on: August 18, 2014, 04:32:04 PM
Brutal.
4  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: Antminer S3 Batch #6 $394.40 // #1 Bitmain Distributor - 112bit.com on: August 08, 2014, 06:57:01 PM
Who would care if a Chinese company declared a different value.. Do they have the same laws?

Ummmm CBSA would definitely care and UPS has some skin in the game too. If you can't afford 13% tax on a miner maybe mining is not for you.

Maybe people don't like paying 13% in extortion fees to highway robbers. Or ANY extortion fees for that matter. Your ever think of that?

Its called a consumption tax and if you don't like it then tell your govt rep or leave the country. Or marry somebody with a status card???

You can call it whatever you want, but it's simply theft.
Seriously? Don't you think telling people who don't agree with you about a fricken tax, to leave the country, is exactly what a Fascist would say, and really uncalled for here? It's not an argument either.
Nevermind, I'm not into name calling or even debate here. Because I know the economic control system of the Western political class and their cronies, such as they rigged it for themselves, is fatally flawed and already well on it's way to self destruction. Whether you or even I or millions of others support the system right now or not - it's already Doomed. Many other people have come to that understanding too, and is in large part why Bitcoin is the phenomenon it is.
And no, I'm not looking forward to all that misery when it does crash. I have a family.
5  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: Antminer S3 Batch #6 $394.40 // #1 Bitmain Distributor - 112bit.com on: August 08, 2014, 06:35:47 AM
Who would care if a Chinese company declared a different value.. Do they have the same laws?

Ummmm CBSA would definitely care and UPS has some skin in the game too. If you can't afford 13% tax on a miner maybe mining is not for you.

Maybe people don't like paying 13% in extortion fees to highway robbers. Or ANY extortion fees for that matter. Your ever think of that?
6  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: Antminer S3 Sales Reopen Soon! // #1 Bitmain Distributor - 112bit.com on: August 05, 2014, 10:35:49 PM
 A couple of months ago I ordered, paid for, and received my S1 (in Canada) with no problems (other than the stupid Bank). The ONLY communication I received from 112bit was a automated notice of payment which included a Order# - that's it that's all. No ETA, no tracking number, nothing.
 Which is fine, I suppose if you don't have any problems or questions whatsoever, and you get your product in a timely fashion - which I did - although I didn't know what day it was coming, and just happened to be home when it arrived. It all worked out fine.

 But my second order, for an S3, was a total screw-up at my end. I tried to communicate this several times with absolutely zero response as to whether I had time to make the payment, or not. I still don't know. So after much effort in trying to get a response, in the end I made another order and paid for that in Bitcoin immediately, instead of a pain in the arse bank wire transfer.

 Anyhow, my feeling is, unless there's something 112bit considers a very serious problem to them, or presumably their customers, forget about any kind of communication from their end. I guess Juan et al are far to busy to respond to the little things. Which I'm ok with actually. Now that I think I know that's the way it is, and as long as I get what I paid for as promised - which I have in the past. After all, I'm not being forced to buy product from 112bit, or getting ripped off. Unlike a lot of other things I'm forced to pay for at gunpoint, like, for say, the Canadian Health Care Cartel; armed expeditions of fucking yahoos to shoot up Afghanistan for shits and giggles, ect ect ect.

Long Live 112bit!
7  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [70 TH] mmpool.org - 1.5% fee split DGM/PPS - tx fees/vardiff/merge mining/tor on: July 03, 2014, 08:25:06 PM
Hi y'all!  Smiley

  I'm hoping somebody could help answer my merged mining, total noob questions. Here goes...

 I have been mining here 24/7 for about 3 weeks with my S1. I've noticed that the longer it takes for a block to be found, the lower my daily BTC income is (according to the "DGM Estimated Round Payout"). Is this correct, or am I missing something?
 If it is correct (where daily profit goes down the longer the round is), why wouldn't anybody leave the pool and go mine someplace else, say, after 175hrs, when it appears as though it's becoming less and less profitable? Would the "DGM Estimated Round Payout" keep diminishing over time if somebody left before the round was complete?

 Clearly, people love mining here, so I'm very reluctant to leave without knowing exactly what it is that keeps people here - even while some rounds have been 500+ hrs (I hope this current one isn't one of them - I think.). Is it the fact that other coins are also being mined and paid out as bonus (something I have not setup yet), with apparently no ill effect on BTC mining income, where other pools don't do this type of mining?

 I hope these aren't silly questions, and that I explained my concerns well enough that it makes sense to somebody who understands this stuff a whole heck-of-alot better than me. Any help would very much be gratefully appreciated!

 Cheers, and Thanks!
 Andre, on the Canadian Tax Slave Farm.

 
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!