Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
tried this with gminer 2.74 and later 2.66 as per recommendation by sp on flexpool. the hashrate unlock is not as good compared to trex or nbminer. will try tbm next weekend if i find the time.
|
|
|
whats the current lhr performance for 3080ti, 3080, 3070ti and 3060 lhr card? any plan to implement dual mining or features to compete with others like trex and lolminer?
I suppose the dream of high hashrate for 6900xt cards are no more
|
|
|
there is a new cuda version 11.6 with the latest nvidia driver, have you gotten a look at it?
also for recent nvidia drivers, on cards like 3080 and 3090 you can get the bug of the card stuck at p3 state after a while and only produce about half of the expected hashrate. can you confirm and maybe create a workaround for this issue?
|
|
|
you are killing it with new releases
|
|
|
v1.33 1. Fixed index problem in stats when running with a selection of the gpu's. 2. Added more pools. 3. Improve the EXIT code for LHR gpu's 4. Improved the stability and speed of the --lhr-unlock 5. Improved --dagintensity more stable on higher clocks. 6. Try to remove more rejected shares on the hiveon pool (again) 7. Fixed bug in the LHR detector 8. Fixed Hang if selecting a non existing cuda device
Errors during regresstion testing. fixed build tomorrow
linux tomorrow
Note that the default unlock setting is a bit agressive and might not work. Lhr unlock support negative numbers so you can try to adjust it.
--lhr-unlock [-50,-50,-50] any LHR number we can expect for 3080 or 3080ti for example?
|
|
|
baby steps. keep it up. i noticed that for trex, lhr unlock performance is not as good on the latest driver. it stays at 73 stable while it could get up to 76 on previous drivers. the number here is the LHR unlock %
|
|
|
I guess my core clock and power settings where too high for the t-rex miner, been running it for a while and it recovered up to ~70 ish. But tbm without LHR code is doing 69MHASH. Perhaps I need --lock-cclock to make it work? Please share your settings..
I am running
core +0 (default setting) trottles abit mem 10700 (+1350) tdp 75% p0 state
here on latest 797.09 ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FHSNA37X.png&t=665&c=0ZCvnGohtReg0A) my configs --mt 2,0,0,0,0,6 --fan 85 --lock-cclock 0,1200,1200,1200,1200,0 --cclock 150,0,0,0,0,200 --mclock 400,1250,1400,1750,1900,500 --pl 90,105,0,116,112,90 3080ti is 1900
|
|
|
admittedly this is on 496.49. i just added a 1060 into the mix and it was quite a pain. finally got everything optimized for now so too lazy to try the latest driver. but its not 40mhs bad. you gotta tune your oc in that case.
|
|
|
It works. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) I will try the lhr-unlock again in the next version. LHR cards are a pain. Take forever to find the perfect settings, but here is a preview of v1.30 ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ibb.co%2FcTcLddy%2Funlock-tbm1-30.png&t=665&c=4wWvBn3tFBhTAw) nice job! please keep it up and unlock more if possible. currently with trex i can get up to 94 and fluctuate between 91-94. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FFEWEe26.png&t=665&c=TypgLguPK1wu4g)
|
|
|
cant wait to try it out. 100mh unlock on 3080ti would be insane
|
|
|
forget the pill, try trex or gminer with -mt 3 or 4 and go from there.
|
|
|
Full lhr unlock scheduled for 1.25? ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
care to elaborate? i cant make sense of the screenshot. are you saying you can get 90% of the full hashrate out of LHR cards?
Yes. On the 3060 LHR 1. should work on lhr 2 as well , but needs to be tested.. Latest drivers.. amazing. soon onto 120mh/s on 6900xt? ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
We are close to do LHR 1 90% unlock on linux/windows.. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ibb.co%2FFmZ2Qww%2Flhr-work-2.jpg&t=665&c=G20UIxP94nTXmA) care to elaborate? i cant make sense of the screenshot. are you saying you can get 90% of the full hashrate out of LHR cards?
|
|
|
A little bug in the presentation of Hashrate/W:
You present it as the sum of hashrate/W for (GPU1 + GPU2.... + GPUn)
It should be sum of hashrate/W for (GPU1 + GPU2... + GPUn)/n
yeah this bugged me as well. surprised nobody mentioned it until now. @sp: do you have a plan to add LHR support anytime soon? more and more are getting bought now with the current ETH pricing. As for 6900XT, is the 120Mh/s dream still on lol
|
|
|
im setting 1200 on my 3080, 3080ti and 3090. memclock varies though. it is the sweet spot for me.
Thanks tried it out on the rtx 3070 laptop gpu. v1.15 with --lock-cclock [1200,1200] 1.14 was only doing 49-50 ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ibb.co%2Fx3jqCZR%2F3070L.jpg&t=665&c=FcxQ99T2dGQyJQ) damn look at that efficiency!
|
|
|
Sorry but why we should increase core on RTX 3080 so much? 1050-1080 range is more than enough to keep stability. Anything more is just a waste of power. I made a test on my cards and passing from 1050 to 1500, wattage moved from 215W to 240W each.
im setting 1200 on my 3080, 3080ti and 3090. memclock varies though. it is the sweet spot for me.
|
|
|
sp makes me seriously consider a 6900xt right now as it still relatively cheap lol anyone with one on hands can share their current results?
|
|
|
This looks promising as the devs are really pulling an effort. Would be nice to see a direct compartment to T-rex miner for nvidia lhr 30x0 cards.
LHR not supported yet. you get the nerfed hashrate as designed by nvidia. switching back to gminer for now...
|
|
|
who will buy lhr cards if the 6900xt can do 120MHASH?
woah is this your endgame lol. right now in Vietnam i can get one for around $1500 so 120mhs would be a steal!
|
|
|
|