Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
Even if you had a miracle code, you still need the computing power of at least a few graphics cards or 1000 cores.if you want to solve it before the competition By the way, the fewer people solving this puzzle, the better. because it is now increasingly difficult for those who do not have computing power
64 took so long to solve because a few people were trying to solve it, when you compare it to 63 which Zielar solved in 3 days, it must have been frustrating. and now a whole army of people are cracking it by the way 63 Zielar solved it with 3 graphics cards
|
|
|
No one expected it so quickly, I thought 68 wouldn't be solved even in a year
|
|
|
python scans 50,000 addresses per second The GPU scans +- 5,000,000,000 addresses per second GPU scans +- 100,000 times faster than python so you can forget about python, you have to make codes for gpu you don't have eternity to solve it with python
|
|
|
lol that's just the beginning not the end
|
|
|
so you shouldn't invest in it, just run the code on the cpu and voila, you can still try to guess the beginning of the range to speed up the solution
|
|
|
maybe hundreds of people puzzling addresses, but if the whole planet started looking for them, then those addresses would just get dusty
|
|
|
It will not be the creator, the more people search for puzzle addresses, the greater the chance of solving them To give an example, if 1,000,000 computers start solving puzzle 67, there is a good chance you will solve it in one day
|
|
|
do you know of a method to make 1000,000,000 public keys take up no more than 20MB of space in a text document?
|
|
|
so today's computing power is able to solve 130 bits it's getting more and more interesting
|
|
|
what processor do you have, this speed is for 1 core and with bitcoin addresses that rust generates how many addresses per second
|
|
|
if the creator put 1000 bitcoins into that puzzle, then he must own thousands more bitcoins, why would he waste his time on some little thing? 6.6 bitcoins is pennies to the creator, even if you take it, it's millions of dollars xd
|
|
|
I wouldn't follow the time, it's never exact, every region has a different time, blockchain goes with its specific time example I have time 1:40 ... blockchain has 23:40 for example
|
|
|
66 was solved quickly, no one complains that they were stolen, so it looks like the person who solved 66 took his rightful reward and the bot didn't get anything
|
|
|
this speed is fake real speed for Iceland library public key is 200k keys/second sequentially depends on processor You can write whatever speed you want there xd
|
|
|
so whatever your plan is, you're not going to leave those bitcoins to the robots in the worst case, you can burn all the bitcoins or actually spend for transaction fees, at least you will have a good feeling, if you don't have it, no one will have it xd you can create a suicide transaction as a last resort
|
|
|
some bots threw errors during this test, why? there will probably be a catch here's how you should do it, by some miracle you solve the 66 address puzzle, then you create a transaction, then a second later you start your own bot that starts creating new transactions for the 66 addresses you have access to, the goal is to flood the blockchain with transactions then after a minute when foreign bots start creating transactions to steal your bitcoins mempol throws errors for those addresses
this means that mempool can block incoming transactions that try to send puzzle 66 to new addresses because it will be evaluated as a crypto attack and cryptographic protection will be turned on
the goal should be for mempool to start throwing other transactions from other bots overboard xd
I don't know, I haven't tried it, it just occurred to me, you have to test it yourself
|
|
|
let's digress a bit, what do you think NPU would work for computing public keys
|
|
|
in the first test you sent it from an address that starts with 1 to an address that also starts with 1 try sending it to an address that starts with 3 or bc1q or bc1p
|
|
|
I think that mempool knows about this problem that the 66 puzzle address is in danger, so the developers could implement protection against bots there that mempool will only accept the first transaction, the rest will be blocked at least for these puzzle addresses with a low range
Limiting Transactions: Mempool can be configured to only accept the first transaction for specific addresses, thus blocking further exploit attempts
|
|
|
Child Pays For Parent (CPFP) in Bitcoin what it does in practice
|
|
|
|