Show Posts
Here is a very easy test to see if the voting was legit.....
I would like to ask ONE shareholder other than Alpinist (for reasons already stated) to come forward that voted to be paid in Ambercoin over btc. That should be easy since according to voting results there were many shareholders that voted to be paid in Ambercoin over BTC, right?
If ONE real person can come on here and explain your reasoning for voting to be paid in Amber over btc, I will shut my mouth.
In order to qualify for this challenge, you have to have a bitcointalk account with a history that proves you are a real person and not a shill account.
I am predicting that not one person will step forward (OTHER than Alpinist) because i do not think there is one legit shareholder that voted to be paid in Ambercoin.
Let's see if anyone takes me up on my challenge.....
I would like to ask ONE shareholder other than Alpinist (for reasons already stated) to come forward that voted to be paid in Ambercoin over btc. That should be easy since according to voting results there were many shareholders that voted to be paid in Ambercoin over BTC, right?
If ONE real person can come on here and explain your reasoning for voting to be paid in Amber over btc, I will shut my mouth.
In order to qualify for this challenge, you have to have a bitcointalk account with a history that proves you are a real person and not a shill account.
I am predicting that not one person will step forward (OTHER than Alpinist) because i do not think there is one legit shareholder that voted to be paid in Ambercoin.
Let's see if anyone takes me up on my challenge.....
I do not like to write too much but...
I voted for reinvestment.
And that's why.
I'm going to hold my shares for a few years. But I am not willing to spend time every day to monitor the current situation.
And when the price will be a few dollars I would not care for what I bought them at - 2, 5 or 10 cents. By the way most of them for 2
Money in cryptoworld is 0.0001% of the real world money or less. Therefore the company which is not limited by cryptomoney has a greater chance of success.
I see that the company is moving its own way. It doesn't try to draw money at any cost. It does not try to please everyone. A simple step-by-step implements his plan. I like this approach.
The majority of those who have the money (or shares) is not ready to make this information public.
Just like they do not care about the opinion of the "investors" with a share of 0.01% which make posts here 10 times a day.
They sit quietly and wait for their time.
Just my 2 cents.
