I sincerely don’t care too much about them adhering to asking customers complete kyc verification or not what matters is them being reputable.

Even if a user completes his/her kyc verification it would still be easy for a shady casino to still come up with a clumsy excuse just to take the players money and the user won’t have anything to do against them. So it is better to move with a casino that has good reputation and has been known to settle customers disputes or problems with good outcome not one that just comes and dictates what the customer did without any real proofs that they did it.

There were lots of nice looking pizzas

I don’t think that’s the reason because from what I read in the article it states that - lottery tickets that won up to a $1,000 dollar should be able to identify where they bought it from, if it was a case of theft then the identification process would have been implemented in all winning tickets and not just to a specific amount won.

I noticed on the news that a man won a lottery and when he arrived to claim his prize, he was requested to state or provide information about where he purchased the lottery ticket, which he couldn't do because he didn't know where he obtained it. It drew my interest, and I wondered if forum users could still tell where they purchased all of their lottery tickets in the previous six months (For those who still engage if physical tickets).

---

If you’re interested in the news you can read it here: https://toronto.ctvnews.ca/ontario-man-can-t-collect-lottery-prize-after-he-forgets-where-he-bought-ticket-1.6924708

This is nothing new in my community - there currently is a school that has some betting center at their campus and yes you’ll see some school kids going there to bet games and some do it while classes are on going or during break. The school I mentioned is a public school so most of the time kids are left to do things by themselves without proper supervision from their class teachers so they end up doing some unethical stuff like staying out while teaching is going on, playing balls during lecture period and watching football matches in betting centers during school period.

It does have negative impact on those that have been wanting to bet in the past and also those that have never bet before have in one way or the other, sometimes when their class mate comes back with the money they won from their bet they tend to become more tempted to gamble.

I thought I was the only one facing this type of issue, I also have this urge to gamble more whenever I have a balance in my account - that’s why whenever I’m done gambling, whether there is profits or no profits I still make sure I withdraw my money from the site (if it’s up to the minimum withdrawal limit) and deposit back when I am ready to gamble again I don’t just like leaving money in my gambling account because I would want to go back and just play a little more with it.

The only time I tend to leave money is when I mange to win big amount and then withdraw part of it - when that urge comes I’ll use the amount already withdrawn to distract myself from going back to my account and with that strategy I can go for weeks without gambling even if I have money in my account but if I haven’t withdrawn anything I won’t be able to distract myself.

If that was their intention I don’t think the name would be enough to fool gamblers into using it. Bitstarz and Bitz may look alike by on clicking on the site you’ll instantly be able to tell that they are both different and if you’ve been playing there you should be able to tell that you’re in a different site.

Well, I don’t know how they’ll resolve the issue but it seems like they have not been online for more than a month now meaning the accusation will remain unattended until they decide to comeback continue their activities here. We don’t know if @Andrew221 did anything that warranted the banning or not, we have to wait till we hear from them before deciding on what action to take.

I don’t deposit such amount through crypto - bcgame allows deposits through fiat so when I get a bet code from a group or friend and I know that it has some good predictions I tend to make such low deposits (when my account is zero) and stake on the game - as a bettor you know that risking large amount on a parlay that has more than +10 games is not a wise thing to do and thus the reason for that little deposits. Sometimes I still deposit large amount and still use just that one from it, but the issue is that I’ll have this urge to go back and gamble with the rest of the money left in the account.

If you withdraw first into your personal wallet before making deposits I don’t think it will affect your address - for me, I feel exchanges use the size of transactions that are being received in a wallet to carry out investigations to see if the funds are safe (clean) or not.

So if you withdraw first then make deposits I’m sure they won’t get anything suspicious from it, that’s what most punters do.

The only two I have read something like that is Binance and coinbase and a user have already shared that of coinbase above and this right here is for Binance.



Personally, I have used my Binance to receive my money from a casino just once and when I did I never got any notification from them or warning concerning what I did - although that was the only time I did it (not sure if it would have happened on continuous usage).

When it comes to sport betting I rarely place bets on a single game - I usually go for parlays that way I would be able to use little money to bet on games that has the potential to give me high returns rather than to stake on them individually and then risk more. In terms of parlays, I have several tickets that lost with just one and some that has numerous games that cut it.

I’m not a consistent sport bettor so I haven’t experFenced a straight five lists but when you come to slots - I have lost more than amount in a straight game and I never felt anything because I knew right from the start that something like that is possible so me trying to console myself by being frustrated with the outcome seems like a foolish thing to do.

The reason what made me laugh after reading the context in the image is the fact that it’s something that I’d also tell a friend if they should come to me for advice and they’ll instantly understand what my true intentions are which is for them not to continue borrowing money to gamble.

And again, the guy asked the wrong question - he asked how to evade the person he’s indebted to he never asked how or what means he could earn money to pay back, meaning the response he got was the best that fits his case.

I feel it’s the same pattern of hype that goes with all these new platform claiming to being able to revolutionize the whole industry.

From what I’ve seen after checking their site - they don’t have a large community yet (so I believe the aim of this thread is inclined to getting more audience) and also they haven’t launched yet, so unless they finally launch and bring what they have in-stored I won’t consider them any different from gambling/gaming site I’ve seen before.

I’m starting to think that we are no going to get any response from the Op. if you look at their profile you’ll notice that they went offline as soon as they made this thread and since then they have not even bothered to log into their account account - for a company that has been in Bitcointalk and has even launched a signature campaign they should be aware that such a behavior would hinder their growth here.

Or maybe they are just trying to delay response so that users would have already shifted their attention to something else - that way they won’t face too much pressure from forum member. Just my thought.

It’s very rare to see telegram experiencing server issues - so it is not something that’s going to happen all the time and even if this happens users won’t panic as it will be general (since telegram won’t work) unlike when they have a site and it experiences server downtime.

By the way, thanks Playgram for the 5 free spins awarded to players, although I didn’t win anything significant but still I was able to spend some time and have fun without having to risk my own money.

From what the Op has explained after my post I think we should let him run it the way he wishes to - since his goal is not to focus on just Bitcointalk users then it won’t be fair for this community to be the one to decide how the game is being run. Also, there’s a possibility of it being canceled due to low number of participants - the first time I went to the channel the Op is trying to gain subscribers to I saw just 7 members and now it’s 9 meaning since the creation of this thread only two people have subscribe to the channel - unless he finds a way to boost the channel I don’t see any reason to him continuing the game since he didn’t achieve his goal.

If what you say is true and you have evidence (solid one) then it would be best to take the issue to scam accusation board and make an appropriate thread there - presenting everything you have against them.

I used the site back then, when I was a part of the signature campaign and I did make withdrawal but not a large one (since I’m not a big gambler) - but if indeed they owe you +$400 and you’re sure you didn’t do anything that requires you to lose it then go and create the thread if analyzing your proofs forum members should be able to decide on what action to take - if it’s to tag and create a flag or not (depending on whether you’re telling the truth or not).

I tried it with my jb and it’s not exactly as you described it in your other thread.

When you try to bet with an amount that’s greater than the max win - you’ll be notified of it, they don’t just allow you place your bet unless you agree to it.



But still, it would be better to remove the option of users being able to stake an amount that exceeds the maximum amount they can win.

I don’t know why it didn’t work at first, even after changing my browser it still didn’t work. But as soon as I connected my VPN and tried it I was able to access it.

I don’t know if it’s the network or my device but it seems like something weird has been going on with it - there are several sites that I have tried to access and been blocked out - even the once I often visit in the past have all started displaying same results.

Despite me using percentage in my post I don’t actually use it in real life senerio - I don’t even have a fixed amount, I usually make deposits based on what’s available and what I can afford to play at that moment. There are times when I feel like just playing and make deposits that not even up $2 and I’ll still enjoy the whole section.