 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
Hi! I've plotted execoins new reward formula to better visualise it. Here, you can see how reward depends on time elapsed from block 307770 and hashrate of the network.  Also, check out 2D plot at http://imgur.com/a/BEpg3 |
|
|
|
just a copy of Vertcoin,without Vertcoin,the devs have nothing. if vert team do not open source,what will you do?  We will be happy! Our implementation of stealth addresses is completely different from Vertcoin's one, uses another language (Python vs. C++), uses another platform (Electrum vs. full-node core client) and shares NO single common line of code with vert. In addition - it gives some additional features not available in vertcoin's implementation. We hope that vertcoin will release their stealth addresses temporary closed-source to protect their intellectual property from copy-paste. This is not our fault that we are working on similar project right now. And Vertcoin does not hold an exclusive patent for innovations. P.S. I think we explained this already a lot of times everywhere. From now on, please refrain from posting this kind of comments in our thread. Many people are not familiar with Vertcoin Stealth Address (First in the world), maybe you're one of them  Maybe, but we are familiar with true "First in the world" working implementation of stealth addresses in DarkWallet, SX and libbitcoin. Thank you for posting last 3 links with sx and darkwallet papers, some of our followers will find this info useful. We are also familiar with our upcoming first in the world Electrum stealth addresses. BTW, for those who are familiar enough with stealth addresses, your givaway of 5k EXE is still unclaimed cryptocoinchronicle.com/2014/06/execoin-innovates-plus-giveaway/! |
|
|
|
Hello, dear execoiners! While I was working on electrum-exe, I've suddenly thought: "What if there are non-english speaking people among our supporters?". There are 16 non-english languages that comes with electrum, but we need to be sure that stealth address feature is translated to at least most widely used languages among our audience. That's why I have created a little poll for you. www.poll.com/JHUi1Please vote with the language that really speaks to you. And if your language is not on the list, please post it below. |
|
|
|
tell us... how can you defend your developments and innovations from the takeover by exe? it is hard to understand how did it first. exe coin devs claim to be the first in this place... so what is the deal? But they haven't released anything Sx related right? I bet they are simply claiming to be first but then waiting for Vertcoin to release the code so that they can start copying wholesale. The only thing I notice going for them is the Electrum Beta. they say that they already have sx in the main net As execoin dev I feel like I should say, that execoin made no claim it would be the first alt to implement stealthes. The reality is that MON have already released stealth in mainnet, and it was inevitable after the long path of testing they took. I'm not even claiming that EXE would release stealth support before VERT. There is a commit in execoin repository with essential updates allowing relaying stealth transactions in the network - OP_RETURN support. github.com/execoin/execoin/commit/5ecb79bb677f14ae698f97c32761c591a3bc0fc5 It has been commited 5 days ago.And yes, we already have a number of stealth transactions in mainnet made by devs. You can see one of them by querying transaction with hash 0499732cacc82d80ef5ea06565e4d3464b54a4135b9130667dcf35766077fe97. It has been sent around three days ago. We have no gui right now, so it's just a dev toy, and saying that we are first in mainnet is senseless. I also would like to note that execoin is going with absolutely alternative implementations in python and electrum, so it will be 100% different. That's why, even being open source fan, I absolutely support Vertcoin release as proprietary closed-source qt client to defend it from copypasting. We are going completely another way. In our implementation of stealth addresses feature there will be no single common line of code with Vertcoin. The only common thing is a whole concept of stealth addresses and this idea was invented neither by Vertcoin nor by Execoin devs, but by darkwallet team. I'm not here to support a holywar, Vertcoin is a coin with a great potential and strong community. Execoin has its own niche in the market too, and is ready to provide its own innovations. And as long as development will be over, we will opensource our code. Thanks for your attention. |
|
|
|
FUKUKAMI fix your crap instead of stealing from others !!! You have no shame  It would be nice if you could write some code once in a while !!
Your android wallet widget still shows megacoin logo on it 2 months later. Do you need help changing the logo or cant you find it on GIT on Google ? You're wrong, sir. I have no relation to this wallet. But you can surely make pull request if you want to. Also, what can you say about this library? github.com/dayreiner/vertcoinj/commits/master? dayreiner/vertcoinj forked from HashEngineering/megacoinjIs forking done by vertcoin devs is the righteous thing to do and by execoin dev - it is not? Also, accusing of forking from open source projects is kinda stupid. Because that's the point why opensource exists in a first place - to promote learning, using and reusing code of other people.And funny pictures and CAPS doesn't make your point more correct. Nor it makes you look smarter. open source using other coins logos on your own coin who looks stupid now ? Just dont bother even talking youre simply digging a bigger hole . FYI open source exist so others can obtain the source and improve/work on it ! NOT to copy and paste trying to make a quick buck without creating anything Theres a name for creatures with such behaviours ---->> parasites ! When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not
price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you
have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for
them if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you
want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new
free programs, and that you know you can do these things.
That's what I'm talking about. You completely miss the point. Also, where exactly have you seen this logo? Can you provide a screenshot? |
|
|
|
FUKUKAMI fix your crap instead of stealing from others !!! You have no shame It would be nice if you could write some code once in a while !!
Your android wallet widget still shows megacoin logo on it 2 months later. Do you need help changing the logo or cant you find it on GIT on Google ? You're wrong, sir. I have no relation to this wallet. But you can surely make pull request if you want to. Also, what can you say about this library? github.com/dayreiner/vertcoinj/commits/master dayreiner/vertcoinj forked from HashEngineering/megacoinjIs forking done by vertcoin devs is the righteous thing to do and by execoin dev - it is not? Also, accusing of forking from open source projects is kinda stupid. Because that's the point why opensource exists in a first place - to promote learning, using and reusing code of other people.And funny pictures and CAPS doesn't make your point more correct. Nor it makes you look smarter. |
|
|
|
1) No your code doesn't magically fix confirmation bugs, you are too stupid to use electrum-vert.
2) Yes there are are enough good developers out there - they just aren't on execoin. You did absolutely nothing so far except copying code by others.
3) I am not even going to comment the sueing shit from you code stealing fags, feel free to sue me too for speaking out the truth.
4) Stop writing me PMs to clear this in private, we wont.
If it doesn't, you are welcome to submit bug report. But it does, and you are not going to do that anyway, because I bet you can't even describe curcumstances that introduces this bug. And as you said "bugs", you probably don't even undertand what I was talking about. Stop writing me PMs to clear this in private, we wont.
You said that yourself. You want to make a grand event from little, now wilingly fixed mistake. What is it if not black PR? Are you really so jealous because I've did it first? And that's how you roll. Rudeness and harshness to polite responses and no proofs of your accusations. Just so you know, that's doesn't make Vertcoin look cooler and vertcoin devs smarter. Really. Not to say this is totally not is the spirit of open source culture. If you don't want anyone to even see your code, why do you make it public in a first place? Also, you totally ignored post by execoin that your paper wallet is broken and you prodly put "Copyright by Vertcoin team" like you did everything yourself, but totally forgot about bitaddress.org. Or was this intentional? Quick to blame anyone else of your own sins? As for wallets. Let's compare https://paperwallet.vertcoin.org, http[Suspicious link removed]coin.net and https://www.bitaddress.org1. Vertcoin developers replaced copyrights of the original developers and (likely, but we are not 100% sure) replaced the donation address by their own. 2. Last tab -'Wallet details' - being used for conversion between key and address formats. Try Qt8yngFMGxpN5mYZ5S3HaorrcTGVTLAf34kVfAPBDJ1tfQyi29t6 on http[Suspicious link removed]coin.net (valid Execoin private key, corresponding address ETeXsJnN87MyPGEHaM1VH2wgk8z19PicVq) and WZbtDqm5aFX6yyXyKQbjMhqWQomt1iXevwyMxuRTCSKkADEtP756 on https://paperwallet.vertcoin.org (valid Vertcoin private key, corresponding address Vt1mjajspSTKDHQdWZHK9qN4e1VpYiKRXx). Vertcoin's converter does not work at all. Is it good idea to "copy pasta" this code? Not at all. We wouldn't like to say that Vertcoin developers are not good, in fact, they are excellent (probably, they were very busy with more important things while creating their paper wallet, those issues with the paper wallet are not so important - in fact, seems like nobody even noticed). This is just to point out that our commitment is to improve and innovate. |
|
|
|
https[Suspicious link removed]
Execoin did it again, awesome.
Dear othe, I've replied to you in the same thread. Please take a look. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=491058.msg7382225#msg7382225Also on reddit comment ciapcss in the same thread. Thanks to Eoinoc for poiting out about the legal issues that could arise from defamation of character. |
|
|
|
Thanks for stealing our hard work again without giving credits to Wozz and Paybee.https://github.com/paybee/electrum-vertThis is where all the hard work was done but you forked the ltc electrum and just copy pasted it over so no one sees its from the electrum-vert github, nice work. Wozz did the main work on this, writing all the KGW stuff in python etc. https[Suspicious link removed]/blob/master/lib/blockchain.py try:
from vtc_scrypt import getPoWHash
except ImportError:
print_msg("Warning: vtc_scrypt not available, using fallback")
from scrypt import scrypt_2048_1_1_80 as getPoWHash try:
from vtc_scrypt import getPoWHash
except ImportError:
print_msg("Warning: vtc_scrypt not available, using fallback")
from scrypt import scrypt_N_1_1_80 as getPoWHash funny that you didn't even make a working scrypt execoin module for python, so this electrum will stop working when execoin nfactor changes... PS: The version you use has still bugs left thats why it wasnt really published. PS2: We are all sooo impressed by the hard working execoin dev....... Dear othe! I was not going to steal anyone's credit and hard work. That was just an accidental error during rebase. Thing is, commits in electrum-vert are a bit messy to my liking, so I've decided to recommit only KGW modifications by wozz. So I'm really sorry I made this to wozz, and I greatly apologize. This is the fix in a repo for that (commit 06612afd5e246628095b518fc9dd83ee21ad2f07) And as far as I can see out of commit history, paybee did nothing in KGW code except mergin PRs ( https://github.com/paybee/electrum-vert/pull/1). If I'm wrong, please correct me, so I should be able to credit him too. Take a note that my code is based on pooler's electrum-ltc and not on electrum-vert, as you can clearly see here at commit c7dcf10109a6160f9692c9eb264e158a8456267d. Also, I've modified pooler's scrypt to add support of current N in execoin. Function is called scrypt_2048_1_1_80 that will be changed with another function soon, and will be aware of N change schedule, but in the meantime I use vtc_scrypt (it's nothing wrong with using open source pypi package, rigth?), that will also be changed to exe_scrypt soon, so current implementation will be left only as a fallback. Anyway, there is at least a year till N in execoin will change, and creating of new function is quick, so don't worry about that. P.S. Electum-vert has not been updated since May 26. Hasn't it been published yet because of bugs? I bet they still have confirmations bug, that is magically fixed in me code. I've fixed some of the bugs discovered during testing phase, if you would find more in electrum-exe - your bug reports will be greatly appreciated. |
|
|
|
|
