autmatic payout in BTC? registration necessary? would like to use only wallet-adress  (thats why i am not on megamultipool or multipool) if you still need a little hashingpower and the above criteria are fullfilled i would switch in one week |
|
|
|
|
2 Units
e88e16e8565d750965e206e631b84aa61dfa154762d9725c54da604e1c73a2fe
|
|
|
|
|
is there a problem with the worker stats?
i am submitting my share over mining_proxy --tor
i submitted last share 15minutes ago
workerstats says >14hours
|
|
|
|
Actually this is where FPGA's have an advantage. They're not useful for the average user, but for hobbyists and anyone with a lot of data can reprogram it for anything. That's why FPGA's are so versatile and exceed ASIC's. You can reprogram an FPGA to work for SHA256 or even scrypt or for doing dictionary generation.
i don't think you can use it for scrypt, at least not this boards without any memory, but i guess many people would like to see a scrypt firmeware |
|
|
|
|
changed power supply, problem solved
|
|
|
|
|
2% fee and NMC goes to the pool?
bitparking mines BTC, NMC, IXCOIN and devcoin and pays them out!
you should work on that, i really miss p2pmining.com
|
|
|
|
hi having some troubles with my board after running since dez2011 i think  first i am getting 2013-04-15 17:31:21.901 [200] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Got H-not-zero share 00000000
2013-04-15 17:31:22.060 [200] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA0: Got H-not-zero share 00000000
2013-04-15 17:31:22.120 [200] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Got H-not-zero share 00000000
2013-04-15 17:31:22.280 [200] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA0: Got H-not-zero share 00000000
2013-04-15 17:31:22.339 [200] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Got H-not-zero share 00000000
2013-04-15 17:31:22.499 [200] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA0: Got H-not-zero share 00000000
then mpbm wants to reset clockrate 2013-04-15 17:32:04.386 [500] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA0: Tracking: Setting clock speed to 50.00 MHz...
2013-04-15 17:32:04.479 [100] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA0: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/root/Modular-Python-Bitcoin-Miner2/modules/fpgamining/x6500/x6500worker.py", line 444, in main
if self.firmware_rev > 0: self._set_speed(self.parent.settings.initialspeed)
File "/root/Modular-Python-Bitcoin-Miner2/modules/fpgamining/x6500/x6500worker.py", line 666, in _set_speed
self._update_job_interval()
File "/root/Modular-Python-Bitcoin-Miner2/modules/fpgamining/x6500/x6500worker.py", line 676, in _update_job_interval
interval = min(60, 2**32 / 1000000. / self.stats.mhps)
ZeroDivisionError: float division by zero
2013-04-15 17:32:05.051 [500] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Tracking: Setting clock speed to 50.00 MHz...
2013-04-15 17:32:05.212 [100] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/root/Modular-Python-Bitcoin-Miner2/modules/fpgamining/x6500/x6500worker.py", line 444, in main
if self.firmware_rev > 0: self._set_speed(self.parent.settings.initialspeed)
File "/root/Modular-Python-Bitcoin-Miner2/modules/fpgamining/x6500/x6500worker.py", line 666, in _set_speed
self._update_job_interval()
File "/root/Modular-Python-Bitcoin-Miner2/modules/fpgamining/x6500/x6500worker.py", line 676, in _update_job_interval
interval = min(60, 2**32 / 1000000. / self.stats.mhps)
ZeroDivisionError: float division by zero
last but not least the firmware will be reloaded, sometimes only FPGA0 comes up, and FPGA1 isn't mining some ideas? i didn't ever change the setup, and that version of mpbm is running for a long time |
|
|
|
|
i am using MPBM, worked fine for months before stratum update
i didn`t get an accept or reject msg, guess not many people are running stratum miner on a router
restarted miner works again...
never touch a running system....
|
|
|
|
|
anyone else having trouble with stratum?
worked fine for some hours
now it is finding share but no accept or reject message, not counted on the pool
|
|
|
|
my miner says its sending valid share 2013-03-13 18:26:38.286 [350] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Found share: slush Stratum:00000002a994272b2941b303babc2c58ba42b3c2e01537c9d6c99a1e000002b200000000eb50701 00cfeb09e7f9aa64f766b4cde8fd7a2660df9d0578a4a4b37223dbff15140b69e1a03d74b:6063807e
2013-03-13 18:26:43.131 [350] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA0: Found share: slush Stratum:00000002a994272b2941b303babc2c58ba42b3c2e01537c9d6c99a1e000002b200000000cfcc38d 4952e594d59fec39db621def2ee438f814ad88e51eeb46f41f01ac3f75140b6a61a03d74b:9936b45f
2013-03-13 18:26:44.136 [400] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Mining slush Stratum:00000002a994272b2941b303babc2c58ba42b3c2e01537c9d6c99a1e000002b200000000e286425 1d96579937d4fb39645d767ecee42ef1f2f2769eff167ae21f3e6459f5140b6b01a03d74b
2013-03-13 18:26:47.716 [350] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Found share: slush Stratum:00000002a994272b2941b303babc2c58ba42b3c2e01537c9d6c99a1e000002b200000000e286425 1d96579937d4fb39645d767ecee42ef1f2f2769eff167ae21f3e6459f5140b6b01a03d74b:63863d22
2013-03-13 18:27:01.614 [400] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Mining slush Stratum:00000002a994272b2941b303babc2c58ba42b3c2e01537c9d6c99a1e000002b200000000d924a43 1a64001d9c396efbffba63830c6ce7887c9996f375e74f1ec61770f9a5140b6c11a03d74b
2013-03-13 18:27:10.098 [350] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Found share: slush Stratum:00000002a994272b2941b303babc2c58ba42b3c2e01537c9d6c99a1e000002b200000000d924a43 1a64001d9c396efbffba63830c6ce7887c9996f375e74f1ec61770f9a5140b6c11a03d74b:921f865a
2013-03-13 18:27:11.761 [350] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Found share: slush Stratum:00000002a994272b2941b303babc2c58ba42b3c2e01537c9d6c99a1e000002b200000000d924a43 1a64001d9c396efbffba63830c6ce7887c9996f375e74f1ec61770f9a5140b6c11a03d74b:a2d2b36e
but statistics on the pool page says i havn't send valid shares since some blocks pool problem or my problem? |
|
|
|
sending an email to getwork users with announcing setting fee to 10% and banning miners without longpoll support are to different things sure i don't care, mining on multiple pools is a nice thing also you are the only pool where i have longpoll problems i didn't even notice trying stratum on stratum.bitcoin.cz works better than on api.bitcoin.cz  |
|
|
|
Is it supposed to look like this, lol? Help!  Try Chrome/Chromium (this is how it looks like on Firefox). I refuse to install Chrome (AKA Google Botnet) since it's a massive security hole and records everything you type into the URL bar. Opera is my main browser due to the tight securty options but the console log never shows up in it. or try safari it works too i use it only for that, and only because its preinstalled on osx |
|
|
|
|
snus - but i heard some countries wont let it thru
i like the black salami, no idea whats the real name, is it really made of elk? i dont think so
|
|
|
|
V2 even more secure because of knowleg of outgoing address and fee integration numberoftransactions=100
maxwaitpertransaction=60
fee=0.0005
rpc.setaccount(rpc.getnewadress(),'account0')
rpc.sendtoaddress(getaccountaddress('account'+0),rpc.getbalance(*,10))
while(rpc.getbalance('account0',10)!=rpc.getbalance('account0',0))
(
wait(10)
)
numberofaccounts=0
for (i=0;i<numberoftransactions;i++)
(
while(rpc.getbalance('account'+i,10)!=rpc.getbalance('account'+i,0))
(
wait(10)
print('.')
)
tosend=(rpc.getbalance(('account'+i,10)-fee)/2)
rand=random(max=tosend/3)
rpc.setaccount(rpc.getnewadress(),'account'+i)
rpc.setaccount(rpc.getnewadress(),'account'+(i+1))
rpc.sendmany<'account'+i>(getaccountaddress('account'+(numberofaccounts+1), tosend+rand,getaccountaddress('account'+(numberofaccounts+2),amounttosend-rand)
numberofaccounts= numberofaccounts+2
wait(random(max= maxwaitpertransaction))
)
i hope getaccountaddress gives the last adress we set to that account, you should check that if you really want to use that code maybe sending all btc to one adress in first place is not so genius... |
|
|
|
why use an external service? some pseudo code: numberofrounds=100
numberofwalletsperround=100
maxtimeperround=60
for (i=1;i<=numberofrounds;i++)
(
for (j=1;j<=numberofwalletsperround;j++)
(
array(i,j)=rpc.getnewaddress
)
)
for (i=1;i<=numberofrounds;i++)
(
for (j=1;j<=numberofwalletsperround/2;j++)
(
amountosend=rpc.getbalance(*,10)/(numberofwalletsperround-2*(j-1));
rand=random(max=amountosend/(numberofwalletsperround-2*(j-1)+1))
rpc.sendmany array(i,(j*2)-1) amounttosend-rand array(i,j*2) amounttosend+rand
wait(random(max=maxtimeperround/(numberofwalletsperround/2)))
)
)
while(rpc.getbalance(*,10)!=rpc.getbalance(*,0))
(
wait(10)
)
) fee= 0.005*numberofrounds*numberofwalletsperround/2 |
|
|
|
|
wenn du 200MHz hast schaffst du 400MH/s
pro zyklus macht du einen Hash pro chip
also Mhz*chip
|
|
|
|
|
meine takten auf max 190mhz mit aktiv kühlung
ich würde dir einen initial wert von 150 empfehlen, nach ein paar stunden schauen wo sie sind und dann den inital wert ein bischen darunter legen
ich weiß nicht ob sie auch unter den inital wert takten..
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
