Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 08:32:47 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: My BTC transaction has been pending for 26days on: December 06, 2023, 01:43:28 AM
The fee rate used for your transaction is below the purging fee rate for any node with default mempool size. Therefore, there are many nodes that don't have your transaction in their mempool now.

Import your wallet to electrum. There's a change you don't see your unconfirmed transaction and you can make a new one.
If you see your transaction in electrum, try connecting to different servers until you find a one that doesn't have your transaction. Once you connect to a node that doesn't have your transaction, your transaction status will change to local and you can remove it from your wallet using right-click menu and then make a new one.

Download electrum only from its official website.
Thanks for your advice. imported and my balance still in wallet, i made new transaction and it seem to be fine now
2  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: My BTC transaction has been pending for 26days on: December 05, 2023, 04:11:07 PM
The transaction fee rate of 11sat/vbyte which is $4 for transaction fee is way too low. The transaction fee will have been ok but those inputs are way too much to get it past through. Also the wallet you’re sending from doesn’t support any means of bumping transaction and it seems they are rebroadcasting the transaction again. If you have private keys to the receiving address I will advice you import it to maybe you electrum wallet if there is funds there you do CPFP. The transaction doesn’t looks like something that will drop now.

Also i just check the mempool.space accelerator too it is expensive too around $21, if it’s ok by you try it. But do not use any accelerator apart from this and viabtc i think they just take your money and rebroadcast transaction only

Also the total receiving amount is still 0.08478975 and not 0.07628310 has you have said
https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/addresses/btc/1LibturcEyL7ZyGLLLfmHziWfUS19P8J79
this site show transaction amount is 0.07628310
https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/address/1LibturcEyL7ZyGLLLfmHziWfUS19P8J79
this site even show my balance is 0.07628310
3  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: My BTC transaction has been pending for 26days on: December 05, 2023, 04:04:46 PM
1659996b0fb053a589b88a0e005b4c54ef22bc0f451e2dcf3c14437877d70de9

above is my TXid, pending for 26days. Tried to use BTCnitro/com to push it up but not work (they didn't refund me as they said, don't try)
Can somebody help me out so my transaction can be confirmed or btc back to my wallet to make a new transaction? I used Viawallet when send it
(and viabtc accelerator is too expensive, cost me more than $400 so forget it)
another interesting thing is while i send 0.08478975btc, now on explorer show it's 0.07618310 only  Huh

Your transaction will not get confirmed and it will probably drop from nodes in some weeks.

I suggest that you use the accelerator from mempool.space,  as you didn't use RBF (replace by fee).

You will have to pay to get it confirmed. I never used this service,  but this site is legit

https://mempool.space/en/tx/1659996b0fb053a589b88a0e005b4c54ef22bc0f451e2dcf3c14437877d70de9
it's 4 weeks already, my wallet doesn't support RBF so i can't do anything but wait it got confirmed or btc back to my wallet
4  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / My BTC transaction has been pending for 26days on: December 05, 2023, 03:46:50 PM
1659996b0fb053a589b88a0e005b4c54ef22bc0f451e2dcf3c14437877d70de9

above is my TXid, pending for 26days. Tried to use BTCnitro/com to push it up but not work (they didn't refund me as they said, don't try)
Can somebody help me out so my transaction can be confirmed or btc back to my wallet to make a new transaction? I used Viawallet when send it
(and viabtc accelerator is too expensive, cost me more than $400 so forget it)
another interesting thing is while i send 0.08478975btc, now on explorer show it's 0.07618310 only  Huh
5  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it on: September 10, 2022, 01:15:30 AM
--- Puzzle #64 ---
Address: 16jY7qLJnxb7CHZyqBP8qca9d51gAjyXQN
PrivKey Hex: 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000F7051F27B09112D4
PrivKey WIF: KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qZ6FxoaD5r1kYegmtbaT
Pubkey Compressed: 03100611c54dfef604163b8358f7b7fac13ce478e02cb224ae16d45526b25d9d4d

waiting for winner show his method here...
6  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Keyhunt - development requests - bug reports on: May 31, 2022, 10:31:42 AM
sr for noob question, but can somebody guide me how to run this code on MacOS or pls suggest me another powerful code which can use with MacOS. I wanna try my luck with my MBP M1max 64gb RAM. I almost have no experience in programming/code, learnt myself and I can use python code but not C/C++. thanks
7  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it on: May 29, 2022, 11:34:41 PM
is it faster if we use brute force attack on addresses in the puzzle by tools like bitbruteforce, plutus, btcbf... I mean these tools are generate random wallets (in 2^256 range) then check a list for matching an wallet with balance, which chance to success is much lower than 0. If now we use these tools but control the range to generate wallet only in 2^64 or 2^71-74... to find matching address in puzzle (the address list still can contain funded addresses).
I think this method will give more chance than kangaroo/bsgs or bitcrack, while solving puzzle they can find some funded addresses but still ignore them because it's not match with their target - addresses in puzzle only
those listed codes are slow in python like turtle  speed
example:https://github.com/Xefrok/BitBruteForce-Wallet
Code:
import time
import datetime as dt
import smtplib
import os
import multiprocessing
from multiprocessing import Pool
import binascii, hashlib, base58, ecdsa
import pandas as pd
from tqdm import tqdm
def ripemd160(x):
    d = hashlib.new('ripemd160')
    d.update(x)
    return d

r = 0
cores=2


def seek(r, df_handler):
global num_threads
LOG_EVERY_N = 1000
start_time = dt.datetime.today().timestamp()
i = 0
print("Core " + str(r) +":  Searching Private Key..")
for xxxxx in tqdm(range(1000000)):
i=i+1
# generate private key , uncompressed WIF starts with "5"
priv_key = os.urandom(32)
fullkey = '80' + binascii.hexlify(priv_key).decode()
sha256a = hashlib.sha256(binascii.unhexlify(fullkey)).hexdigest()
sha256b = hashlib.sha256(binascii.unhexlify(sha256a)).hexdigest()
WIF = base58.b58encode(binascii.unhexlify(fullkey+sha256b[:8]))

# get public key , uncompressed address starts with "1"
sk = ecdsa.SigningKey.from_string(priv_key, curve=ecdsa.SECP256k1)
vk = sk.get_verifying_key()
publ_key = '04' + binascii.hexlify(vk.to_string()).decode()
hash160 = ripemd160(hashlib.sha256(binascii.unhexlify(publ_key)).digest()).digest()
publ_addr_a = b"\x00" + hash160
checksum = hashlib.sha256(hashlib.sha256(publ_addr_a).digest()).digest()[:4]
publ_addr_b = base58.b58encode(publ_addr_a + checksum)
priv = WIF.decode()
pub = publ_addr_b.decode()
time_diff = dt.datetime.today().timestamp() - start_time
if (i % LOG_EVERY_N) == 0:
print('Core :'+str(r)+" K/s = "+ str(i / time_diff))
#print ('Worker '+str(r)+':'+ str(i) + '.-  # '+pub + ' # -------- # '+ priv+' # ')
pub = pub + '\n'
filename = 'bit.txt'
with open(filename) as f:
for line in f:
if pub in line:
msg = "\nPublic: " + str(pub) + " ---- Private: " + str(priv) + "YEI"
text = msg
#UNCOMMENT IF 2FA from gmail is activated, or risk missing your winning ticket;)
#server = smtplib.SMTP("smtp.gmail.com", 587)
#server.ehlo()
#server.starttls()
#server.login("example@gmail.com", "password")
#fromaddr = "example@gmail.com"
#toaddr = "example@gmail.com"
#server.sendmail(fromaddr, toaddr, text)
print(text)
with open('Wallets.txt','a') as f:
f.write(priv)
f.write('     ')
f.write(pub)
f.write('\n')
f.close()
time.sleep(30)
print ('WINNER WINNER CHICKEN DINNER!!! ---- ' +dt.datetime.now().strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S'), pub, priv)
break




contador=0
if __name__ == '__main__':
jobs = []
df_handler = pd.read_csv(open('bit.txt', 'r'))
for r in range(cores):
p = multiprocessing.Process(target=seek, args=(r,df_handler))
jobs.append(p)
p.start()
the fastest python library is here: https://github.com/iceland2k14/secp256k1
thanks for your suggestion. i know that these tools are slow, but i'm talking about other method to do. btw iceland2k14/secp256k1 code is for running on window only, i wanna try my luck with my macbook pro. can you pls suggest other python code? sr but i am not a coder or dev...
8  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it on: May 29, 2022, 10:40:33 AM
is it faster if we use brute force attack on addresses in the puzzle by tools like bitbruteforce, plutus, btcbf... I mean these tools are generate random wallets (in 2^256 range) then check a list for matching an wallet with balance, which chance to success is much lower than 0. If now we use these tools but control the range to generate wallet only in 2^64 or 2^71-74... to find matching address in puzzle (the address list still can contain funded addresses).
I think this method will give more chance than kangaroo/bsgs or bitcrack, while solving puzzle they can find some funded addresses but still ignore them because it's not match with their target - addresses in puzzle only
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!