I don't agree with this bill. I mean it is like saying that contributing to the security of the Bitcoin network is not a worthy business to use carbon-based power sources, while other businesses like plastic fabrics, transportation firms or retail stores are acceptable... I thought USA was a country focusing on innovation and the spirit of freedom.

I'm not saying that using renewables energy sources shouldn't be enforced (IT SHOULD!), but for all businesses gradually, not just to some isolated niches. Leaders of the world need to find the balance between economic development, defense and environment protection. I won't say that I know which one of these needs to be prioritized, but the ones in charge need to find a fine balance between these three WITH the future generations in mind. What's the meaning if we have high living standards if the world as we know it will be evaporated in 50 years due to climate change?