 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
|
Maybe I haven't had enough coffee yet, but does this "singular" vision also extend to miners and their mining balance? I have some residual coins in nicehash.com when I moved my miners over to westhash.com. Is there a way to merge that?
|
|
|
|
The Bitmark Foundation
./bitmarkd sendtoaddress bQmnzVS5M4bBdZqBTuHrjnzxHS6oSUz6cG 200 "the bitmark foundation"
d3c1b75d68333d95c8e1c9db4f4ba5b4719bce97008fe73c0cfb5f551d7f3b2d
I have sent the first 200 coins to the bitmark foundation address: bQmnzVS5M4bBdZqBTuHrjnzxHS6oSUz6cG
The difficulty has jumped 4x already.
The network is at 2.5GH/s.
I did not expect this. These coins have no value, yet.
Thank you everybody, I think we can say we have launched successfully.
Congrats on the hard work, dude. EDIT: I suck at words |
|
|
|
|
And just like that, the coin output has been slashed by a quarter... damm!
|
|
|
|
Mine doesn't have the rpcallowip or the rpcconnect... and it's working... i have 400 btm so far  What's your hashrate? |
|
|
|
Hoped on to miningpool.co... for the life of me, solo mining wasn't working...  |
|
|
|
Nice Any nodes please ? wow, yes: "addr" : "174.36.9.130:9265", "addr" : "173.192.30.99:9265", "addr" : "2.82.42.33:53906", "addr" : "92.210.23.27:56630", "addr" : "144.76.64.123:9265", "addr" : "90.156.62.44:57422", "addr" : "110.255.184.251:9265", "addr" : "128.90.15.164:58628", "addr" : "84.24.204.134:51074", "addr" : "79.103.61.218:9265", "addr" : "68.59.115.9:50448", "addr" : "176.104.121.135:65095", I think you may be the only one not auto getting nodes. I'll add one more... <ahem> 167.88.35.8 |
|
|
|
The problem I see here, is there are no incentives for larger hashrates to join the network, which potentially hurts security.
Can't we mitigate this with merged mining? |
|
|
|
|
Did you compile cgminer yourself?
If you did, rename /opt/AMDAPP folder to anything else and try again.
|
|
|
|
Points to discuss
1. A starting difficulty?
2. Domain name?
3. What have I forgotten?
1.) I think your logic here is sound. Nothing earth shattering, just a fair chance for all. 2.) I was thinking of something with the .mk TLD but you have to be registered in Malaysia to get one... bummer. Other than that, something like bitmark.cc (the CC being to crytpo currency... ) 3.) How about talking to a list of pool owners that are reputable? Let's not get any Tom/Dick/Jane kind of pool in here, let's get reputable ones. You won't fend off the bit-players (pardon the pun) but at least having an "approved" list of pools will establish some sort of credibility / reputation. The same should go for Exchanges. |
|
|
|
1. Unless there is easy access to scrypt ASICs for everyone to rent I worry that one or two individuals who are in possession of those devices before the mass propagation of ASICs to the general public could dominate the hashing. They could use that hashing power for malicious purposes but I think it's more likely that they would just monopolize the mining and probably hoard the coins while waiting for the project to progress.
Or the opposite might happen. So Bitmark gains a little traction and a massive sell whale floats on by and crushes the price of the coin. How do you mitigate this? One thing I have though about is that, at its core, this is a monetary vehicle and a digital one at that. Why can't we toss around the idea of forming a foundation? Dogecoin has a foundation but their philosophy is more altruistic than anything. The idea is to form a "Bitmark Foundation" purely from the standpoint of protecting an asset. How do we do that? We do it in the same way companies do when they believe in the strength of their business, with a stock purchase, or in our case a Bitmark purchase. When whales begin to dump, let's put our money where our mouths are, have the BMF initiate a purchase of the currency and hold it in a public address. How do we fund this? Through the community, of course! The BMF would be formed of community members that pool their moneys and are entitled to a percentage of the publicly available funds. This is just me talking from the lack of sleep but it makes sense to me. I haven't seen any other coin do this but please correct me if I'm wrong. Thoughts? |
|
|
|
- Block 1 Reward / Premine: no, it is too much up front, and even if agreed now, would be frowned upon member of the community who are not with us yet.
I generally dislike IPOs (and you'll get trolls telling you it's illegal but that's besides the point) so I'm good with NO IPO. However, premining, when it's small and explicitly detailed in its purpose, is accepted as the cost of doing business. It incentivizes the development team, sets aside monies for bounties, resource acquisition and general petty cash. I don't think the community hates premines, I think they hate OBSCENE premines (greater than 5%, 10%) and are vague in their usage as this is generally seen as a move to get-rich-quick. Just a thought... |
|
|
|
I saw that, which is what I was going for with the 'f.' Unfortunately, almost no fonts have that unicode symbol built into them.
Very nice. To me, I like the last version on each row My preference is the monochrome version of the first version. I would like to hear what you and others think. Thank you. +1 on the white/monochrome with the gradient. That looks nice. |
|
|
|
You are in luck. I have a handful of CentOS based VMs (6.4 to be exact) that I can put through the mill with the pre-compiled binaries. I'll let you know how it works out. |
|
|
|
Anyone else who has problems logging into Alcurex? I logged twice today, transferred some coins there... and after that I don't receive the security pin for final logon on mail account (received it first 2 times) Wrote to support - no response , wtf?! According to the admin, he took the wallets offline to rebalance. I had the luck doing a withdrawal moments before it went offline. Same thing, no email verification and logging on from another computer was useless because... again, no email PIN to be received. |
|
|
|
|
Talk to me more about the Fedora task.
I'm more of a CentOS man but the core is, literally, the same thing.
You need someone to build the server and client components on it?
|
|
|
|
Could someone tell me how to run/install the linux wallet, please? If unzip the freshcoin-qt64, no readme no nothing THX! SAME ISSUE. QT Creator doesn't reconize this file. I tried to change the extension to xxx.pro and it throw back errors. I pucked out and fired up my old windows laptop and install the wallet. First time in a long time I got beat by linux complexity. Positive note 7950 at I18 getting 2.9 to 3.2 Mhs 7979 at I18 getting 3.6 I haven't changed core/mem settings, yet. I installed onto my PiMP OS and made copies and moved to my other rigs. Using command line for now to get going, with move to conf file. Anyone know how to get this kernel intergrated into PiMP OS? Happy Fresh hashing! I'm using the linux QT wallet just fine. You need to unzip it, chmod +x it and run it. |
|
|
|
|
Sounds great!
Yeah, sent you the link via PM. I'll be around to guinea pig if need be.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah ok, makes sense... thanks for that.
In any case, I have it available if need be. I can PM you the link if you wish.
|
|
|
|
does this coin have any exchanges???
I could have SWORN Poloniex was mentioned as an exchange in OP's post but now it's TBA. |
|
|
|
|
