After going through several posts and rules that guides this forum, I found out that most people found to be creating their own rules at the detriment of others. A clear example of such can be seen in here. There are more related of this kind here that accuse users of doing one of these:

- You will be suspected to be using or controlling more than one account when you receive or send some payment or merit to a particular account often.

- You will be suspected of using multiple account if in anyway your writing style is the same with another user.

There is no place among the rules that guides this forum, that is stated that someone who is found of doing this, is going against the rules. It is clearly stated that having multiple accounts is allowed.

My question now is, is it a violation of law for hunters to send token to one another? Even if the linking address has nothing to do with the forum like in their POA? Why are many being accused of alt accounts even without enrolling multiple accounts in one campaign?
It's like a depriving of freedom preventing users from sending and receiving token outside the forum.

So you're expecting me to use like 3 pages for my post? Like I should present all their posts before you can accessed? This is ridiculous!

You were eager to respond and you don't read to understand, I don't even know if you really read before making this comment. I will refer you to the post again but read with full concentration this time around and you'll find an answer to what motivated me to care about those 5 accounts.
These accounts were tagged earlier than the 5 accounts I used in my post.  Seems you are looking for an opportunity like this for a long time to bring up these   well, you have it now.
Thank God you're just starting to think. You can come back to delete this after you are through with your thinking.
I actually care because I might be a victim some other day hence I want JollyGood to give examples of how a quality post looks like. If you read my post very well from the beginning to end all these your questions have an answer in the post. I don't know JollyGood or heard anything about him. I also stated clearly in my post what prompted me to check his profile. In fact, I admire JollyGood and even proud of him having such reputation in the forum but this particular attitude of him deserves attention and need for him to change.

So tagging someone's account with neutral seems like a good compliment to you right? It's a defamation of account and that's a bad reputation to the affected users. No one will care if they really produce low quality posts as he claimed.

As a newbie and someone who want to be comfortable in this forum, I observed that they're certain things that deserves attention from mods and administrators.
This user JollyGood after going through his profile and the trust feedback, I decided to make this post for clarification on what and how high quality posts looks like. Seeing him with high positive feedback and some negative feedback made me to go through his profile.
A sets of users were tagged by him as producing a low quality posts which made me to compare some posts and came up with this thread. To make it short, I will post just one post from some of the accounts that were tagged as producing low quality posts. Here we go...
Victim 1 post
Victim 2 post
Victim 3 post
Victim 4 post
Victim 5 post
To make everything short and precise, I will stop at this 5. Now let see one among the posts of jollygood who accused other users of making low quality posts. Here we go...

Let us all be fair and not bias, which among of these quotes Post is low quality for God sake? I don't know for you but I have my answer already which I believe you all know.
The victim 1-5 posts are not in anyway a low quality post. For equity to prevail, I am aware that the forum has standard for quality and low quality posts but I want JollyGood to tell the forum the criteria he uses to access posts before giving his verdict and tagged it a low quality posts and, provide the victim's post he deleted as low quality post for others to see as well. How can you delete posts and still put it on the reference section? How do you want others to check your assertion? Where is the justice?
In conclusion, JollyGood should review the tags because it is seen as abuse of trust and way to intimidate the upcoming users. However, I can say BitcoinGirl.Club has been vindicated for saying
In one of the comments on trust feedback of JollyGood.
Tagging people's account for low quality post while you're also not perfect is absolutely hypocritical. No shade!

---

This post is not sponsored or not in any way to dent the reputation of anyone but to ensure the forum is serene and, where there's freedom for anyone as it suppose to be and not to be a ground of intimidation where the strong oppress the weak.

Even when everyone has his or her own point of view towards success, everyone's end goal should be happiness, because even if you have money, fame or achievement you need to be happy with them before you can enjoy them.

This reminds me of one of pareto's quote in his book, "the 80/20 principle"

He said, if there a trade off between happiness and achievement, choose happiness.

So fucus on things that are more important to you first.
Your happiness is the must important thing because there is no reward in doing something you doesn't enjoy.

Would you mind doing some giveaway for the forum
Both teams actually played well in both halves but Bayern Munich proved that they're More classic than Barcelona.