Bitcoin Forum
June 21, 2024, 07:31:08 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Economy / Gambling / Re: Anonibet Official Thread - Gold Member of Bitcoin Foundation on: July 25, 2014, 08:47:24 PM

Still no sufficient answers to the World Cup Scam Contest and now anoniscam running more promos?

+1 LOL Totally agree  Grin

+1 Also, still no answer to stealing funds from account kincaidsupplies@hotmail.com 

Anonibet=Players don't cheat us...we cheat them!
2  Economy / Gambling / Re: Anonibet Official Thread - Gold Member of Bitcoin Foundation on: July 21, 2014, 03:23:07 PM
Still waiting for why they are not paying out account kincaidsupplies@hotmail.com and why they claimed that account cheated after an "investigation," when in fact, it was played normally on purpose to test their "Casino Service Provider investigation" claim. They lied, plain and simple. Anonibet=You don't cheat us...we cheat you. Feel free to explain your position Anonibet. You sent an email stating that account manipulated your system after an investigation, but no investigation took place and that account was set up for the sole reason to play normally and catch you in that "investigation" lie.
3  Economy / Gambling / Re: SPORTS BOOK RANKINGS ~ USER GENERATED (PLEASE CONTRIBUTE) on: July 19, 2014, 03:42:30 PM
Anonibet -1

Claims I cheated on account (kincaidsupplies@hotmail.com) when in fact I did not. They have no evidence to support such a claim. Have not paid me my withdrawal of around .25 BTC.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=55365.1020  Will update my score if they do make good on my withdrawal request. It's been 5-6 days now and nothing.
4  Economy / Gambling / Re: Anonibet Official Thread - Gold Member of Bitcoin Foundation on: July 19, 2014, 03:25:27 PM
Still waiting on why my account (kincaidsupplies@hotmail.com) has not been paid out and why I was informed that I manipulated their gaming software and wasn't going to be paid, when in fact, I purposefully didn't do it on that account to see if they would react the same way to the other account I made. I kept receiving the same generic template email from them for the various accounts I made in regards to the suspicious activity...and they were correct in their accusations. However, on my kincaidsupplies@hotmail.com account they sent the same email.

So this means they DID NOT look into the matter and the Casino Service Provider DID NOT send them a report of any kind for that account. They lied because it was more convenient for them to do so rather than truly looking into the account and game play. I challenge them to produce those documents showing I manipulated their game for that account. I'm cool with the other accounts because I did execute some methods on those...but not this one. They even said in their generic emails that I was free to withdraw my initial deposit, however I'm still unable to do that at the very least. But for the kincaidsupplies@hotmail.com account, it should be my withdrawal plus winnings. It's only about .25 BTC so this goes to show who they really are. If anyone of you would have made a new account, deposited money and played blackjack then tried to cashout right away over the last couple weeks, they would have sent you the same email even though you didn't do anything...just like they did with the kincaidsupplies@hotmail.com account. Here's their generic email that's no more than a copy/paste job from previous emails I've received. Problem is though, THIS ACCOUNT WAS PLAYED LEGITIMATELY ON PURPOSE TO TEST THEM ON IF THEY WOULD REACT THE SAME WAY...AND THEY DID!


We have received a report from the Casino services provider and you did not play fairly in our casino. First and foremost It is stated in all our games’ common rules that “A malfunction voids all pays and plays.” Therefore, any attempt to somehow manipulate and change the game process from initially programmed one can be considered a malfunction, even if initially overseen by our side. It has been noted that instead of playing the game through the given interface, you decided to send manual requests to the casino and this is prohibited as such manipulation is used solely to gain unfair advantage therefore not tolerated at all.

You also made request change attempts for multiple games while checking for vulnerabilities. I am sure you are fully aware the logs cannot be sent to you as they are confidential and can be use in further manipulations therefore I would like to announce to you that your winnings will be confiscated, and you are free to withdraw the initial mBTC that you deposited.  
5  Economy / Gambling / Re: Anonibet is now Gold Member of Bitcoin Foundation on: July 18, 2014, 11:52:37 AM
Michael,

I understand your point. However, the fact is you were alerted to "suspicious activity" and it's been 6 days now with nothing to further bolster those claims. So the "suspicious activity" alert to halt my withdrawal was based on nothing more than me simply winning. The actions of your company demonstrate that as a fact as there hasn't been any evidence to support otherwise. This is a huge turnoff to players if your third-party providers says, "STOP!...don't pay him!...he won a lot...that's impossible...must have cheated."

If a player could indeed cheat your system (however unlikely that may be), you would think that there would be evidence to support it aside from winning. I won a decent amount fast (without cheating) and that is unacceptable for you guys. But you guys were the ones who put the double-up feature in place. You guys were the ones who decided to allow up to 5 double-ups within a single game. I've been to many casinos where they limit the double to just 1, or put a cap on how much you can win before forcing you to collect the winnings (ie., can't double over 50 credits, etc..) or disable it altogether. If you don't like the risk you took by having your game allow 5 double-ups with no credit cap, then change it. It's gambling, sometimes you guys lose too you know.

I know the allegations of me cheating will not be backed up by proof because there wasn't any cheating. I think the community will also agree with my position that having 6 days go by and have no smoking gun is enough. Again, if a player was to cheat your system then I would think after 6 days of issuing the "Alert" there would be some evidence showing exactly what they were doing, etc... All we have is the fact that I won...which is somehow synonymous with cheating and/or suspicious activity.  
did you receive your winnings after all?


No he did not receive his winnings, we have not paid him. He emailed us and admitted he has manipulated the system. He came up with a proposal to get something from us, stating he is very wise and advanced on technology. He can post the email he has sent to us if he is willing to, we will not disclose his email as part of our privacy policy.



"Get something from you?" It's called a business proposal. In full disclosure to everyone, I did manipulate their game(s)...it's what I do. However, I'm still curious why you didn't address my concern over that last account I made Michael...the trap one? People probably won't understand what I'm referring to so I'll post my email and then you can answer that question. If Anonibet doesn't want my services, no problem...but they did not perform due diligence on one of the accounts I made and confiscated the deposit and winnings based upon it having the same characteristics of my other ones. Then they email me saying I manipulated the games and no funds will be withdrawn, even though I purposefully played that account legit...as a trap so to speak, to see if they will react the same way, AND THEY DID!  So the email sent to me about the Casino Service Provider investigating the account and saw manipulation was a LIE. That account was played 100% legit as it was a test for them...they should pay that one out. Anyway, here is my email so everyone will know what I'm talking about:

We're having quite the cat and mouse game, huh? We can both agree you have a glaring vulnerability with your online casino. We both know that they (Casino Service Provider) do not send alerts to you warning of suspicious activity right away, if at all. At first I thought the accounts were on hold because of the exploit but soon realized it's undetectable (as evidenced by it not being fixed) and the holds are based on newly created accounts mixed in with types of games played and how fast I cashout, etc... This was easy to spot after enough cashout tests. It's apparent that if a cashout comes through with the above-mentioned characteristics it will be put on hold. Not a problem for me cause I can simply blend it in. You may think you "got me" with stopping accounts from being cashed out but you were giving me what I wanted...information. I know exactly what to do now in order to stay under the radar. As each test/account goes by I gain more and more information.

Yesterday I made a new account (kincaidsupplies@hotmail.com), played the same game (blackjack) and cashed out right away. However, this time I didn't deploy the exploit on purpose...not once. I believed so strongly that you would react the same way because it followed the same exact patterns as mentioned above minus the exploit. This was another test...to see if you can distinguish the difference between the two.  For some reason you labeled that account as being used to manipulate the software and the winnings would be confiscated. But we both know it was never really looked at and nothing was found. I know this because I purposefully did not use the exploit for that account so telling me anything different would be moot. No worries though...I won't pass judgment on that based upon the adversarial nature of the business we're in.

So now that I know you guys are being way too over-reactive for any account that follows the same patterns, I have a new protocol for staying under the radar. Again, it's obvious you guys don't know where your weaknesses are and how to fix them. Interestingly enough, the exploit I have is actually only the first one I've tried on your site. When I find something I never continue testing for weaknesses until the current one is done with...in case you get a 2 for 1 on the fix.

Let me get down to why I'm emailing you. I'm offering a partnership of sorts where we agree to a fixed price for giving up the exploit and showing you where your vulnerability is for it. I'm also offering a partnership where we agree to another fixed fee for further testing on your site for more exploits. From my perspective, this makes the most business sense for both of us. I'm extremely confident in my ability to continue on with the exploit and scale it with a new deployment protocol in place, so I'm not at all worried about continuing to make money with this. Again, most of those "you caught me" accounts are nothing more than to extract information on how you are handling this.

I am enclosing a video which is my resume of sorts, one clip of which may be of interest to you. Feel free to respond back via email if you want to discuss this further. Here is the link: http://youtu.be/egkpf7ZvaiI  (make sure volume is on). Thank you for your time.
6  Economy / Gambling / Re: Anonibet is now Gold Member of Bitcoin Foundation on: July 01, 2014, 02:25:50 PM
Michael,

I understand your point. However, the fact is you were alerted to "suspicious activity" and it's been 6 days now with nothing to further bolster those claims. So the "suspicious activity" alert to halt my withdrawal was based on nothing more than me simply winning. The actions of your company demonstrate that as a fact as there hasn't been any evidence to support otherwise. This is a huge turnoff to players if your third-party providers says, "STOP!...don't pay him!...he won a lot...that's impossible...must have cheated."

If a player could indeed cheat your system (however unlikely that may be), you would think that there would be evidence to support it aside from winning. I won a decent amount fast (without cheating) and that is unacceptable for you guys. But you guys were the ones who put the double-up feature in place. You guys were the ones who decided to allow up to 5 double-ups within a single game. I've been to many casinos where they limit the double to just 1, or put a cap on how much you can win before forcing you to collect the winnings (ie., can't double over 50 credits, etc..) or disable it altogether. If you don't like the risk you took by having your game allow 5 double-ups with no credit cap, then change it. It's gambling, sometimes you guys lose too you know.

I know the allegations of me cheating will not be backed up by proof because there wasn't any cheating. I think the community will also agree with my position that having 6 days go by and have no smoking gun is enough. Again, if a player was to cheat your system then I would think after 6 days of issuing the "Alert" there would be some evidence showing exactly what they were doing, etc... All we have is the fact that I won...which is somehow synonymous with cheating and/or suspicious activity.  
7  Economy / Gambling / Re: Anonibet is now Gold Member of Bitcoin Foundation on: July 01, 2014, 01:50:11 PM
Must have been some real sophisticated "cheating" I was doing for your software provider to investigate this matter for almost a week now and still have no proof. Sounds legit  Roll Eyes
8  Economy / Gambling / Re: Anonibet is now Gold Member of Bitcoin Foundation on: July 01, 2014, 01:18:37 PM
Just so people know what it's like to win with Anonibet: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=672929.0
9  Other / Archival / ........... on: July 01, 2014, 12:59:56 PM
........
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!