 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
|
Read the other thread on Vultaic. This is 100% a scam coin/rug pull. And the only thing the original poster will keep spamming as a reply to everyone is "FUD" and "fake news"
This one is even worse than CryptoLuck and I didn't think that was possible
|
|
|
|
Even Pugs, the person who initially "helped" you set up your fake etc zil for e9 pro's, is the person that talks the most shit about you on Bitmain telegram and discord now (his telegram name is *_*). He is also the one that confirmed ETHW is more profitable than your fake etc zil pool. Crazypool isn't the only one that has proven the E9 Pro cannot mine ZIL, but k1pool (who is much more technologically capable than flexpool) and ezil have, as well. Just stop already
We have quite a bit of respect for K1Pool devs. They are wrong it is possible, but they have a really good ZIL implementation we struggle to match. That being said, crypto networks are transparent and you've yet to explain how we manage to make more ZIL a round per GH/s than Crazypool. If our E9 Pro's aren't working then how is the network giving us ZIL? Is the Zilliqa network conspiring to fake it and airdropping us? Just stop with the lies, your zil support is fake: https://i.ibb.co/dbGhTL2/image.png |
|
|
|
|
Even Pugs, the person who initially "helped" you set up your fake etc zil for e9 pro's, is the person that talks the most shit about you on Bitmain telegram and discord now (his telegram name is *_*). He is also the one that confirmed ETHW is more profitable than your fake etc zil pool. Crazypool isn't the only one that has proven the E9 Pro cannot mine ZIL, but k1pool (who is much more technologically capable than flexpool) and ezil have, as well. Just stop already
|
|
|
|
|
E9 Pro does not support zil mining, period. The miner is technologically incapable of switching to epoch 0 to generate the ZIL DAG file, and Bitmain has confirmed this exact matter, specifically stating that there is "no support for other coins or fallback to previous blocks mining, Epoch support will be updated with block update (meaning ZIL will be supported when the block number reaches epoch 1 in September), and no support for previous Epochs (epoch 0)."
Flexpool's fake ETC ZIL mining not only is less profitable than straight ETHW mining (as confirmed by Pugs), but is a complete hustle to try to get Bitmain users on the pool before epoch 1 begins. They take a small loss on the ZIL side of things but subsidize the loss with their ETC revenue gained and massive hidden fees.
|
|
|
|
|
change requests:
1. add zil intensity parameter so we can run custom intensity for vtc and zil separately
2. show real-time hashrate instead of average hashrate for zil mining
|
|
|
|
using nvidia linux 525 driver for a while now on all my rigs, cuda 12 version does not work on any of them in hiveos. same error as i showed before: https://i.ibb.co/XttnMyR/tbm.jpgcuda 11.6 works. i also tried running updater for 11.6 first then running cuda 12 and still does not work on hiveos. i also have latest hiveos kernel, as well |
|
|
|
latest driver with cuda 12 support? try the 11_6 build TeamBlackMiner_1_78_Ubuntu_18_04_Cuda_11_6.tar.xz cuda 11.6 update worked, cuda 12 didn't work. testing 11.6 now. ill come back with results/bugs |
|
|
|
linux bins have been added. TBM 1.78 is the fastest miner for KAWPOW on NVIDIA RTX cards. Beating t-rex with a few percent on the POOL..
linux update does not work. ran manual update and get this looping error: https://i.ibb.co/XttnMyR/tbm.jpg |
|
|
|
|
Also just wanted to add that woolypooly VTC has "job not found" rejects still fairly frequently in version 1.77. Does not happen on hashalot
|
|
|
|
Tried VTC on Wooly with the same "possible stale" errors a lot, as well. And they result in stale shares. Still also getting about 2-3% rejected on Wooly, and about 0.5% rejected on Hashalot
In v1.78 verthash will have staleshare fix as well with higher poolspeed. Sounds good, any chance you can do VTC + zil dual mining? Then would be perfect |
|
|
|
|
Tried VTC on Wooly with the same "possible stale" errors a lot, as well. And they result in stale shares. Still also getting about 2-3% rejected on Wooly, and about 0.5% rejected on Hashalot
|
|
|
|
Using 1.77 on Hashalot VTC, and I get a lot of these "Possible Stale Job" messages: https://i.ibb.co/4FTH9N5/image.pngOther than that, this version seems good so far. If you could add VTC + zil dual mining using zil ZMP protocol like Flexpool has, it would be perfect. bzminer can do ERG + zil that way for good profits |
|
|
|
 Reproduced after a difficulty change. This is a problem with the pool. If you change to miningpoolhub.com or hashalot.com you should get 100% accepted. There are some things you can do to improve it. Reducing the intensity might help. Also please check that you have a low ping on the connection. Changing the mining server to a closer pool will help. I have 20-22ms ping to woolypooly server on my shares (Wooly is the lowest ping of all VTC pools), tried reducing intensity to 256 with same problem. Even after 8h uptime, still 3-4% rejected share rate: https://i.ibb.co/nRKpvxc/image.pngIt's not just at diff changes, either. You can see in this picture the time stamps, there was no diff change, just the block was solved and the miner submitted the share after: https://i.ibb.co/S3KSJtp/image.png |
|
|
|
Testing new 1.75 version and it seems to have fixed both the miner restart errors on VTC as well as the miner stalling with 0 difficulty. However, it seems rejected share count is high as you can see here: https://i.ibb.co/3kw7bg6/image.png2 rigs of 12 cards each both have 3-4% rejected shares. The shares seem to all be from "job not found" errors when a share is submitted after block was solved already |
|
|
|
Another bug I found mining VTC on woolypooly is that sometimes a rig will reach a point where the miner stops submitting shares and the difficulty is reduced to basically 0. The miner will not restart and will sit idle until I restart it which is a big problem: https://i.ibb.co/bvgWvwH/image.png |
|
|
|
|
